SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

EU Maritime Security Strategy: A Theoretical Analysis

AB DENİZ GÜVENLİĞİ STRATEJİSİ: TEORİK BİR İNCELEME

Kübra ÇOBAN HASTUNÇ
Pages
295–341
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to clarify these questions by conducting an in-depth and theoretical study of the adoption of the EUMSS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:How can we explain the integration of EU maritime foreign and security policy?
📊
Key Findings & Data:What were the driving forces behind member states' adoption of the EU Maritime Security Strategy (EUMSS), which they initially opposed, after a short period of time?
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to clarify these questions by conducting an in-depth and theoretical study of the adoption of the EUMSS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AB Deniz Dış ve Güvenlik Politikası · AB Deniz Güvenliği Stratejisi · Neo-Realizm

Abstract

How can we explain the integration of EU maritime foreign and security policy? In other words, how can we explain the addition of the 'maritime' as a new dimension to the EU's foreign and security policy? What are the main mechanisms that ensure integration in the maritime domain? What were the driving forces behind member states' adoption of the EU Maritime Security Strategy (EUMSS), which they initially opposed, after a short period of time? This article aims to clarify these questions by conducting an in-depth and theoretical study of the adoption of the EUMSS.

Özet

AB deniz dış ve güvenlik politikası entegrasyonunu nasıl açıklayabiliriz? Yani AB’nin dış ve güvenlik politikasına yeni bir boyut olarak ‘deniz’in eklenmesini nasıl açıklayabiliriz? Denizcilik alanında entegrasyonu sağlayan temel mekanizmalar nelerdir? Üye devletlerin başlangıçta karşı çıktıkları AB Deniz Güvenliği Stratejisi’ni (ABDGS) (EU Maritime Security Strategy-EUMSS) kısa bir süre sonra kabul etmesinde hangi itici güçler etkili olmuştur? Bu makale, ABDGS’nin benimsenmesine ilişkin teorik bir çalışma yürüterek bu soruları açıklığa kavuşturmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

HASTUNÇ, K. Ç. (2022). EU Maritime Security Strategy: A Theoretical Analysis. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 295–341. https://ajindex.com/articles/857219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aggestam, Lisbeth. “Role theory and European foreign policy: A framework of analysis.” İçinde The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, editörler Ole Elgström ve Michael Smith, 11-29. London: Routledge, 2006.
  2. Allen, David. “Who Speaks for Europe? The Search for an Effective and Coherent External Policy.” İçinde A Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of the CFSP, editörler John Peterson ve Helene Sjursen, 41-58. New York: Routledge, 1998.
  3. Baird, Theodore. “Where is civil society in the EU’s new Maritime Security Strategy?”, Open Democracy, 7 Kasım 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ekim 31, 2022, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/where-is-civil society-in-eus new-maritime-security-strategy/. Barnett, Michael ve Martha Finnemore. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. 1. Baskı. London: Cornell University Press, 2004. Busch Per-Olof ve Andrea Liese, “The Authority of International Public Administrations.” İçinde International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research, editörler Michael W. Bauer, Christoph Knill ve Steffen Eckhard, 97-122. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
  4. Carlsnaes, Walter. “Foreign Policy.” İçinde Handbook of International Relations, editörler Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse ve Beth A. Simmons, 298-325. London: Sage Publications, 2013.
  5. Checkel, Jeffrey T. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55, no 3 (2001): 553-588.
  6. Chou, Meng-Hsuan ve Marianne Riddervold. “Beyond Delegation: How the European Commission Affects Intergovernmental Policies Through Expertise.” ARENA Working Paper 12, Kasım 2014, 1-21.
  7. Chou, Meng-Hsuan ve Marianne Riddervold. “The Unexpected Negotiator at the Table: How the European Commission’s Expertise Informs Intergovernmental EU Policies.” Politics and Governance 3, no 1 (2015): 61-72.
  8. Copeland, Paul ve Scott James, “Policy windows, ambiguity and Commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union's economic reform agenda.” Journal of European Public Policy 21, no 1 (2014): 1-19.
  9. Council of the European Union. “Council conclusions on developing a European Union Policy towards the Arctic Region.” Foreign Affairs Council Meeting, Brussels, 12 Mayıs 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 2, 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/28342/142554.pdf. AB DENİZ GÜVENLİĞİ STRATEJİSİ: TEORİK BİR İNCELEME 335 Council of the European Union. “European Union Maritime Security Strateg