SavedAdd your journal

Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 50

Forced Migrant: The Factors Contributing to Social Functionality of Syrian Youth

Ahmed Taha ARİFOĞLU
Orhan KOÇAK
Pages
807–823
Publication Date
2022-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, social work practice with a multidimensional community is recommended.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Forced migrants face many problems during the forced migration process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consisted of 326 young Syrian forced migrants aged 18 to 29 who are under temporary protection status in Turkey and was conducted in Istanbul, Sakarya, and Izmir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, social work practice with a multidimensional community is recommended.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Active Coping · Satisfaction with Life · Perceived Social Support

Abstract

Forced migrants face many problems during the forced migration process. At the forefront of these problems is the negative impact of the forced migration process on their social functionality. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors contributing to the social functionality of Syrian youth under temporary protection status in Turkey. The sample of the study consisted of 326 young Syrian forced migrants aged 18 to 29 who are under temporary protection status in Turkey and was conducted in Istanbul, Sakarya, and Izmir. The study was carried out with the quantitative method and snowball sampling. The obtained data were evaluated by correlation, mediator and moderator analysis methods. According to the data obtained in the study, Perceived social support and satisfaction with life have a significant effect on social functionality. Satisfaction with life has a full mediating effect on the effect of perceived social support on social functionality. In other words, as a Syrian youth's perceived social support grows, so does their social functionality, and satisfaction with life has a full mediating positive effect on this relationship. Planning activity, which is an active coping strategy, has a positive moderating effect on the connection between perceived social support and social functionality, according to this model. In this context, social work practice with a multidimensional community is recommended.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARİFOĞLU, A. T., KOÇAK, O. (2022). Forced Migrant: The Factors Contributing to Social Functionality of Syrian Youth. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 50, 807–823. https://ajindex.com/articles/856855

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Özcan, Z. (2019). Göçün travmatik etkilerini azaltmada sosyal desteğin rolü üzerine deneysel bir araştırma. Bilimname, 37, 1001-1028. https://doi.org/10.28949/bilimname.518401.
  2. Özen, Ş., Antar, S., Altındağ, A., & Oto, R. (2001). İç göç yaşayan bir grup lise öğrencisinde ruhsal belirti şiddetinin cinsiyet ile ilişkisi. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 8(3), 156-162.
  3. Acartürk, C. (2016). Göç ve ruh sağlığı ilişkisi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(25), 137-150. 10.16992/ASOS.1104. Afshar, H., Roohafza, H. R., Keshteli, A. H., Mazaheri, M., Feizi, A., & Adibi, P. (2015). The association of personality traits and coping styles according to stress level. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 20(4), 353-358. PMID: 26109990. Ahmad, F., Othman, N., & Lou, W. (2020). Posttraumatic stress disorder, social support and coping among Afghan Refugees in Canada. Community Mental Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00518-1.
  4. Akıncı, B., Nergiz, A., & Gedik, E. (2015). Uyum süreci üzerine bir değerlendirme: Göç ve toplumsal kabul. Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 58-83.
  5. Akhtar, S. (2018). Göç ve kimlik: Kargaşa, sağaltım ve dönüşüm. (S. Ayhan, Çev.) Sfenks Kitap. Akkaya, C., Sarandöl, A., Danacı, A. E., Sivrioğlu, E. Y., Kaya, E., & Kırlı, S. (2008). Sosyal uyum kendini değerlendirme ölçeği (SUKDÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19(3), 292-299.
  6. Attar, G. E., & Küçükşen, D. (2019). Somehow familiar but still a stranger: Syrian students in Turkish higher education. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 20(4), 1041-1053.
  7. Ayon, C., & Naddy, M. B. (2013). Latino ımmigrant families’ social support networks: Strengths and limitations during a time of stringent ımmigration legisiation and economic insecurity. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21542.
  8. Bacanlı, H., Sürücü, M., & İlhan, T. (2013). Başa Çıkma Stilleri Ölçeği Kısa Formunun (BÇSÖ-KF) psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(1), 81-96.
  9. Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (H. Aydın, Çev.) Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi.
  10. Bertalanffy, L. V. (2004, Nisan 27). Ecological system approach. global.net: http//:www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ebstudy/stra- tegy/ecosys.htm. adresinden alındı. Bhugra, D. (2004). Migration and mental health. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109, 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1046/