Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 1996 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Angioplasty or Surgery? The Possibilities In The Treatment Of Coronary Heart Disease.

Anjioplasti mi Cerrahi mi? Koroner Kalp Hastalığı Tedavisinde Günümüzde Seçimler

Pages
9–12
Publication Date
1996-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The advances in the treatment of ischemic heart disease since 1950 are summarized and the possible therapeutical approaches as well as the recent studies on their effectiveness are reviewed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The advances in the treatment of ischemic heart disease since 1950 are summarized and the possible therapeutical approaches as well as the recent studies on their effectiveness are reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The advances in the treatment of ischemic heart disease since 1950 are summarized and the possible therapeutical approaches as well as the recent studies on their effectiveness are reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The advances in the treatment of ischemic heart disease since 1950 are summarized and the possible therapeutical approaches as well as the recent studies on their effectiveness are reviewed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anjioplasti · Koroner By Pass Cerrahisi · İskemik Kalp Hastalığı

Abstract

The advances in the treatment of ischemic heart disease since 1950 are summarized and the possible therapeutical approaches as well as the recent studies on their effectiveness are reviewed.

Özet

İskemik kalp hastalığının tedavisinde 1950'li yıllardan günümüze kadar olan gelişmeler özetlenerek, özellikle birden fazla damarında lezyon bulunan hastalarda seçilebilecek tedavi yolları ve bunların sonuçları konularında son yıllardaki araştırmalar ve gelişmeler derlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİNALP, H., ERDAL, C., DİKMENGİL, M. (1996). Angioplasty or Surgery? The Possibilities In The Treatment Of Coronary Heart Disease.. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 9–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/856682

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Longmire WP Jr, Cannon JA, Kattus AA. Direct vision coronary endarterectomy for angina pectoris. New Engl J Med. 1958;259(21):993-999. doi:10.1056/NEJM195811202592101 Vineberg AM. Treatment of coronary artery insufficiency by implantation of the internal mammary artery into the left ventricular myocardium. J Thorac Surg. 1952;23(1):42-54. Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein graft in the surgical management of coronary artery disease: Operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;58(2):178-185.
  2. Sones FM Jr, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Cone Cardiovasc Dis. 1962;31:735-738.
  3. Gruentzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplatsy. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(2):61-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197907123010201 Myrmel T. Treatment of ischemic heart disease coronary surgery or angioplasty? An evaluation based on clinical and experimental data, (abstract) Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen:1993; 113:1873. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of ten year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994;334:563-570.
  4. Peduzzi P, Hultgren H, Thomsen J, Detre K. Ten-year effect of surgical and medical therapy on quality of life: Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59(12):1017-1023. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90841-1
  5. Miller TD, Christian TF, Taliercio CP, et al. Impaired left ventricular function; one or two vessel coronary artery disease and severe ischemia: outcome with medical therapy versus revascularisation. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69(7):626-631. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61337-8 Van den Brand M, van Halem C, van den Brink F, et al. Comparison of costs of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery for patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J. 1990;11(8):765-771. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059792 Fuse K, Nakanishi S, Nishiyama S, et al. Early and late results of coronary bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1992;93(9):1002-1005. RITA Trial participants: Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet. 1993;341(8845):573-580.
  6. Rodriguez A, Boullon F, Perez-Balino N, Paviotti C, Liprandi MI, Palacios IF. Argentine randomized trial of per