Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Transradial Approach in Coronary Angiography

Koroner Anjiyografide Transradial Yaklaşım

Pages
22–28
Publication Date
2021-02-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the advantages of the coronary angiography procedure via the radial artery approach, the guideline recommendations and the concerns about the procedure were examined in the light of the studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Transradial approach, which is a new method for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions, has increased in popularity over time after its first application and has become a standard approach in many centers today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Transradial access is a safe intervention method compared to transfemoral, due to lower intervention site complications, short hospital stay, early patient mobilization, high patient comfort and low major bleeding events.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the advantages of the coronary angiography procedure via the radial artery approach, the guideline recommendations and the concerns about the procedure were examined in the light of the studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Transradial koroner anjiyografi · radial arter ultrasonografi · Transradial coronary angiography

Abstract

Transradial approach, which is a new method for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions, has increased in popularity over time after its first application and has become a standard approach in many centers today. Transradial access is a safe intervention method compared to transfemoral, due to lower intervention site complications, short hospital stay, early patient mobilization, high patient comfort and low major bleeding events. In this article, the advantages of the coronary angiography procedure via the radial artery approach, the guideline recommendations and the concerns about the procedure were examined in the light of the studies.

Özet

Koroner anjiyografi ve perkütan koroner girişimler için yeni bir yöntem olan transradial yaklaşımın ilk kez uygulanmasından sonra zaman içinde popülaritesi artmış olup günümüzde bir çok merkezde standart yaklaşım haline gelmiştir. Transradial girişim transfemoral ile karşılaştırıldığında, daha düşük girişim yeri komplikasyonları, hastane yatış süresinin kısa olması, erken hasta mobilizasyonu, yüksek hasta konforu ve düşük major kanama olayları nedeniyle güvenli bir girişim yöntemidir. Bu yazıda radial arter yoluyla yapılan koroner anjiyografi işleminin avantajları, klavuz önerileri ve işlem ile ilgili kaygılar yapılan çalışmalar ışığında incelendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIŞ, M., DUYGU, H. (2021). Transradial Approach in Coronary Angiography. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 22–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/856530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 1999
  2. 138(3):430-436. doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70143-2 2.Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998
  3. 32(3):572-576. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00288-5 3.Kiemeneij F, Hofland J, Laarman GJ, Van Der Elst DH, Van Der Lubbe H. Cost comparison between two modes of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation: transradial bare stent technique vs. transfemoral sheath-protected stent technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995
  4. 35(4):301-308. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810350405 4.Choussat R, Black A, Bossi I, Fajadet J, Marco J. Vascular complications and clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty with platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade: comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral arterial access. Eur Heart J. 2000
  5. 21(8):662-667. doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1945 5.Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020
  6. ehaa575. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575 6.Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010
  7. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.039 7.Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures
  8. systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004
  9. 44(2):349-356. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034 8.Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Lee T, et al. Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after transradial coronary intervention by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart. 2010
  10. 31(13):1608-1615. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq102 9.Burstein JM, Gidrewicz D, Hutchison SJ, Holmes K, Jolly S, Cantor WJ. Impact of radial artery cannulation for coronary angiography and angioplasty on radial artery function. Am J Cardiol. 2007
  11. 99(4):457-459. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.055 10.Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, et al. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003
  12. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)