SavedAdd your journal

Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Structure and Spatial Distribution of the Rotifera Assemblages in Kırklareli Reservoir (Kırklareli/Turkey)

Kırklareli Baraj Gölü'ndeki (Kırklareli/Türkiye) Rotifera Faunası’nın Yapısı ve Mevsimsel Dağılımı

Hüseyin GÜHER
Pages
332–344
Publication Date
2022-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to these results, we conclude that Kırklareli Reservoir has an oligomesotrophic character in terms of the Rotifera fauna and the physicochemical parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the diversity, abundance, and seasonal distribution of Rotifera in Kırklareli Reservoir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Rotifera samples were collected from May 2018 to April 2019 at three stations in the reservoir and some water quality parameters were measured.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to these results, we conclude that Kırklareli Reservoir has an oligomesotrophic character in terms of the Rotifera fauna and the physicochemical parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rotifera · fauna · mevsimsel dağılım

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the diversity, abundance, and seasonal distribution of Rotifera in Kırklareli Reservoir. Rotifera samples were collected from May 2018 to April 2019 at three stations in the reservoir and some water quality parameters were measured. The qualitative evaluation of the samples revealed the presence of 39 species in the reservoir. The quantitative evaluation of the samples showed that 24727 ind/m³ Rotifera on average was found in the reservoir. The maximum organism number was found in the summer season (45690 ind/m3). The average 27.3 % of the total annual Rotifera abundance was composed of Kellicottia longispina in Kırklareli Reservoir followed by Polyarthra dolichoptera (24.6 %), Lecane luna (6.8 %), Asplanchna priodonta (6.4%), Synchaeta oblonga (5.3%) and Synchaeta pectinate (4.9 %). Asplanchna priodonta, Synchaeta oblonga, Synchaeta pectinata, Keratella cochlearis, Keratella quadrata, Polyarthra dolichoptera, Polyarthra vulgaris and Mytilina mucronata were found the most common species in the reservoir. The water quality parameters measured in the reservoir were detected among the acceptable values to support aquatic life, especially the Rotifera community. The Rotifera densities and abundance showed a positive correlation with water temperature and Chlorophyll-a. According to these results, we conclude that Kırklareli Reservoir has an oligomesotrophic character in terms of the Rotifera fauna and the physicochemical parameters.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Kırklareli Baraj Gölü'nün Rotifera çeşitliliğini ve mevsimsel dağılımını belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Mayıs 2018 ile Nisan 2019' tarihleri arasında gölde belirlenen üç istasyonda Rotifera örnekleri toplanmış ve bazı çevresel parametreler ölçülmüştür. Rotifera örneklerin kalitatif değerlendirmesinde 39 Rotifera türü belirlenirken kantitatif değerlendirmeler sonucunda baraj gölünde yıllık ortalama 24727 ind/m³ Rotifera tespit edilmiştir. Kırklareli Baraj Gölünde en fazla bolluğa sahip olan tür Kellicottia longispina (%27,3) olurken bunu Polyarthra dolichoptera (% 24,6), Lecane luna (% 6,8), Asplanchna priodonta (% 6,4), Synchaeta oblonga (% 5,3) ve Synchaeta pectinata (% 4,9) takip etmiştir. Asplanchna priodonta, Synchaeta oblonga, Synchaeta pectinata, Keratella cochlearis, Keratella quadrata, Polyarthra dolichoptera, Polyarthra vulgaris ve Mytilina mucronata rezervuarda en yaygın türler olarak bulunmuştur. Rezervuarda ölçülen çevresel parametreler, başta Rotifera faunası olmak üzere sucul yaşamı desteklemek için kabul edilebilir değerler arasında tespit edilmiştir. Rotifera yoğunluğu ve bolluğu, su sıcaklığı ve Klorofil-a ile pozitif korelasyon göstermiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre Kırklareli Rezervuarının Rotifera faunası ve fizikokimyasal parametreler açısından oligomezotrofik bir karaktere sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜHER, H. (2022). Structure and Spatial Distribution of the Rotifera Assemblages in Kırklareli Reservoir (Kırklareli/Turkey). OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 332–344. https://ajindex.com/articles/856263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Altaff, K. (2004). A manual of zooplankton. University Grants Commission, New Delhi. 1-155 p. Anonymous, (2015). Yüzeysel Su Kalitesi Yönetimi Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı: Resmî Gazete, 15 Nisan 2015, Sayı: 29327. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/04/20150415-18.htm Anonymous, (2019). Kırklareli İli 2018 Yılı Çevre Durum Raporu. Kırklareli Valiliği Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü Çed, İzin ve Denetim Şube Müdürlüğü, Kırklareli, 122 p. Barnett, A., & Beisner, B.E. (2007). Zooplankton biodiversity and lake trophic state: Explanations invoking resource abundance and distribution. Ecology, 88, 1675–1686. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1056.1
  2. Berzins, B., & Pejler, B. (1987). Rotifer occurrence in relation to pH. Hydrobiologia, 147, 107-116.
  3. Buyurgan, Ö., Altındağ, A., & Kaya, M. (2010). Zooplankton community structure of Asartepe Dam Lake (Ankara, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10, 135-138.
  4. De Manuel Barrabın, J. (2000). The Rotifers of Spanish Reservoirs: Ecological, Systematical and Zoogeographical Remarks. Limnetica, 19, 91-167.
  5. Dorak, Z. (2019). A preliminary study on using rotifera fauna to determine the trophic level of the Büyükçekmece Reservoir (İstanbul, Turkey). Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(4), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019586048
  6. Dorak, Z., Köker, L., Gaygusuz, Ö., Gürevin, C., Akçaalan, R., & Albay, M. (2019). Zooplankton biodiversity in reservoirs of different geographical regions of Turkey: Composition and distribution related with some environmental conditions. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019522326
  7. Edmondson, W. T, (1959). Methods and Equipment in Freshwater Biology. 2nd ed. John Willey and Sons. Inc., New York, 420-1202.
  8. Ejsmont-Karabin, J., Radwan, S., & Bielańska-Grajner, I. (2004). Rotifers. Monogononta- atlas of species. Polish Freshwater Fauna. Lódź, University of Lódź, 77-447. EPA, (1994). Method 200.8: Determination of Metals and Trace Elements in Water and Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry, https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/epa-method2008-determination-trace-elements-waters-and-wastes
  9. Geller, W., & Müller, H. (1981). The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity. Oecologia, 49, 316-321.
  10. Gökçe, D., & Turhan, D. Ö. (2014). Evaluation of vertical and horizontal changes in community str