SavedAdd your journal

Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

A Comparison of different types of bait using (Common Prawn (Palaemon serratus Pennant, 1777), Morio Worm (Zophobas morio Fabricius, 1776), and African Migratory Locust (Locusta migratoria L. 1758)) effects on catch efficiency in marine angling

Farklı Yemlerin (Teke Karidesi (Palaemon serratus Pennant, 1777), Morio Kurdu (Zophobas morio Fabricius, 1776) ve Afrika Göçmen Çekirgesi (Locusta migratoria L. 1758)) Olta Balıkçılığında Av Verimliliğine Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıldız BOLAT
Atılgan KUNT
Pages
518–534
Publication Date
2022-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the Unit Cost Calculation based on the total weight of the fish, the lowest-cost bait was calculated as the African Migratory Locust.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In angling, live, non-living and artificial baits are used according to the fish species and habitat.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, Morio wolf (Zophobas morio Fabricius, 1776) and African Migratory Locust (Locusta migratoria L. 1758) from hexapoda species were tested in comparison with Common Prawn (Palaemon serratus Pennant, 1777) in terms of usability and efficiency in marine angling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the Unit Cost Calculation based on the total weight of the fish, the lowest-cost bait was calculated as the African Migratory Locust.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teke karidesi · Afrika göçmen çekirgesi · Morio kurdu

Abstract

In angling, live, non-living and artificial baits are used according to the fish species and habitat. In this study, Morio wolf (Zophobas morio Fabricius, 1776) and African Migratory Locust (Locusta migratoria L. 1758) from hexapoda species were tested in comparison with Common Prawn (Palaemon serratus Pennant, 1777) in terms of usability and efficiency in marine angling. The study was carried out in Yelkoma Lagoon (Adana), with a total of 420 fishing trials and 80 fish (72 sea bream, 8 sea bass) were caught. Of the sea bream, 45% by Common Prawn, 33% by African Migratory Locust, and 22% by Morio Wolf also, of the sea bass, 75% by the African Migratory Locust, and 25% by the Morio Wolf were caught. Average CPUE and YPUE values for the fishing line were computed as 0.003 (hook/fish/hour) and 0,327 (hook/g/hour) respectively. According to the Unit Cost Calculation based on the total weight of the fish, the lowest-cost bait was calculated as the African Migratory Locust.

Özet

Olta balıkçılığında hedef balık türlerine ve habitatlara göre canlı, cansız ve yapay yemler kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Hexapoda türlerinden Morio Kurdu (Zophobas morio Fabricius, 1776) ve Afrika Göçmen Çekirgesi (Locusta migratoria L. 1758)’nin denizde olta balıkçılığında kullanılabilirliği ve av verimlilikleri Teke Karidesi (Palaemon serratus Pennant, 1777) ile karşılaştırmalı olarak test edilmiştir. Çalışma, Yelkoma Dalyanı’nda (Adana-Türkiye), toplam 420 olta operasyonu gerçekleştirilmiş ve 80 adet balık (72 adet çipura, 8 adet levrek) yakalanmıştır. Çipuraların % 45’i Teke Karidesi ile %33’ü Afrika Göçmen Çekirgesi ile ve %22’si Morio Kurdu ile, Levrek balığının da %75’i Afrika Göçmen Çekirgesi ile %25’i de Morio Kurdu ile yakalanmıştır. Oltaların ortalama CPUE değeri 0,003 (iğne/balık/saat) ve YPUE değeri de 0,327 (iğne/g/saat) olarak belirlenmiştir. Balıkların toplam ağırlıkları üzerinden yapılan Birim Maliyet Hesabına göre, en düşük maliyete sahip olan yemin Afrika Göçmen Çekirgesi olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOLAT, Y., KUNT, A. (2022). A Comparison of different types of bait using (Common Prawn (Palaemon serratus Pennant, 1777), Morio Worm (Zophobas morio Fabricius, 1776), and African Migratory Locust (Locusta migratoria L. 1758)) effects on catch efficiency in marine angling. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 518–534. https://ajindex.com/articles/856257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akamca, E., & Kiyağa, V. B. (2009, Temmuz 01 - 04). Olta ile Levrek (Dicentrarchus labrax) avcılığında kullanılan canlı yem büyüklüğünün avcılığa etkisi. XV. Ulusal Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, Rize, Türkiye. Alos, J., Arlinghaus, R., Palmer, M., March, D., & Álvarez, I. (2009). The influence of type of natural bait on fish catches and hooking location in a mixed-species marine recreational fishery, with implications for management. Fisheries Research, 97(3), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.03.003
  2. Alpbaz, A., & Özer, A. (1991). Olta Balıkçılığı (Tüm Yönleri ile). Mas Basım Evi. Amorim, S., Santos, M. N., Coelho, R., & Fernandez‐Carvalho, J. (2015). Effects of 17/0 circle hooks and bait on fish catches in a southern Atlantic swordfish longline fishery. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 25(4), 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2443
  3. Aneesh Kumar, K. V., Paravin, P., Remesan, M. P., & Bharathiamma, M. (2015). Efficacy of bait species and baiting pattern on hooking rates and bait loss during longline fishing in Lakshadweep Sea. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 44(12), 1844-1851.
  4. Arlinghaus, R., & Cooke S. J. 2009. Recreational fisheries: socioeconomic importance conservation issues and management challenges. In B. Dickson, J. Hutton, & W. M. Adams (Eds.), Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods (pp. 39–58). Oxford: Science and Practice. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi: 10.1002/9781444303179.ch3 Ateşşahin, T., Aslan, E., & Özmen, M. M. (2014). Elazığ İlindeki Amatör Balıkçıların Sosyo-Demografik Özellikleri Üzerine Bir Ön Araştırma. Aquaculture Studies, 2014(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.vi.235404
  5. Ateşşahin, T., Duman, E., & Cilbiz, M. (2015). Selectivity and catch efficiency of three spinner hook Sizes in angling for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)(Walbaum, 1792) in Karakaya Dam Lake (Eastern Turkey). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 15(4), 851-859. https:// doi: 10.4194/1303-2712-v15_4_08 Ateşşahin, T., & Cilbiz, M. (2018). Türkiye İç Su Amatör Balıkçılığında ‘Amatör Balıkçı Belgesi. Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, 4(2): 103-111
  6. Ateşşahin, T., & Cİlbiz, M. (2019). The effect of hook size, spinner colour and fishing season on catching efficiency in angling for rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792). Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 51(5), 1937-1942. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.5.1937.1942
  7. Aydın, İ. (2011). Is natura