Journals / Firat University Journal of Experimental and Computational Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Production and characterization of chitosan-based polymer particles with the precipitation collection method

Pages
68–79
Publication Date
2022-06-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

EDX analysis performed on the selected region, it was determined that the chitosan-based polymer particle consisted of 43.58 % C, and 49.83 % O.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a chitosan-based polymer particle was produced to be used as a sorbent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, it was measured that the polymer particle diameters were to be between 3.388 and 3.903 mm and the densities of the particles were to be 0.389-0.416 g/cm3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:EDX analysis performed on the selected region, it was determined that the chitosan-based polymer particle consisted of 43.58 % C, and 49.83 % O.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chitosan · Polymer particle · Sorption

Abstract

In this study, a chitosan-based polymer particle was produced to be used as a sorbent. Gel particle production was carried out using chitosan samples with different acetylation degrees and molecular weights. The produced particles were characterized. In the first phase of the study, chitosan samples were provided and structural analyses were performed. In the second stage, polymer particle production was carried out by the precipitation-collection method. The morphological, structural, and physicochemical properties of the produced gel particles were examined. In the last step, the sorption efficiency of the particles (distilled water, oleic acid) was investigated. As a result, it was measured that the polymer particle diameters were to be between 3.388 and 3.903 mm and the densities of the particles were to be 0.389-0.416 g/cm3. Distilled water holding capacity of the particle which was produced with an 85 % DDA chitosan sample, was calculated as 0.523 g/gparticles, and the oleic acid holding capacity was determined as 0.286 g/gparticles. These values are approximately 20 % lower than the values obtained with the 75 % DDA chitosan sample. Low molecular mass chitosan sample sorbed 0.556 g distilled water per gram particle and 0.193 g oleic acid per gram particle. These values were calculated as 0.170 g/gparticle and 0.381 g/gparticle for the particles produced using high molecular weight chitosan samples, respectively. EDX analysis performed on the selected region, it was determined that the chitosan-based polymer particle consisted of 43.58 % C, and 49.83 % O.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMIRTAŞ, H., TAŞAR, Ş., KAYA, F., ÖZER, A. (2022). Production and characterization of chitosan-based polymer particles with the precipitation collection method. Firat University Journal of Experimental and Computational Engineering, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 68–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/852093

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sharma S, Sudhakara P, Singh J, Ilyas RA, Asyraf MRM, Razman MR. “Critical review of biodegradable and bioactive polymer composites for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery applications”. Polymers, 13(16), 2623, 2021
  2. Fernandez-Kim SO. Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Crawfish Chitosan as Affected by Different Processing Protocols. MS dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, L.A., 2004
  3. Tajik H, Moradi M, Rohani SMR, Erfani AM, Jalali FSS. “Preparation of chitosan from brine shrimp (artemia urmiana) cyst shells and effects of different chemical processing sequences on the physicochemical and functional properties of the product”. Molecules, 13, 1263-1274, 2008
  4. Peker İ, Oktar F, Eroğlu M, Morkoç E. “Kerevit kabuklarından kitosan üretilmesi ve kesilmiş sütün suyundan laktoz izolasyonu işleminde kullanılması”. Tübitak MAG Project, Project number: 104M017, 88, 2006
  5. Rinaudo, M. “Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications”. Progress in Polymer Science, 31, 603-632, 2006
  6. Nemtsev SV, Gamzazade AI, Rogozhin SV, Bykova VM, Bykov VP. “Deacetylation of chitin under homogeneous conditions”. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 38 (6), 521–526, 2002
  7. Paulino AT, Simionato JI, Garcia JC, Nozaki J. “Characterization of chitosan and chitin produced from silkworm crysalides”. Carbohydrate Polymers, 64, 98-103, 2006
  8. Hajji S, Younes I, Ghorbel-Bellaaj O, Hajji R, Rinaudo M, Nasri M, Jellouli K. “Structural differences between chitin and chitosan extracted from three different marine sources”. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 65, 298-306, 2014
  9. Kaur S, Dhillon GS. “The versatile biopolymer chitosan: potential sources, evaluation of extraction methods and applications”. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 40, 155-175, 2014
  10. Kurita K. “Chitin and chitosan: Functional biopolymers from marine crustaceans”. Marine Biotechnology, 8, 203-226, 2006
  11. GlycoPedia. “Extraction of Chitin & Preparation of Chitosan” https://www.glycopedia.eu/e-chapters/from-chitin-to-chitosan/article/extraction-of-chitin-preparation-of-chitosan (21.01.2022)
  12. Du J, Tan E, Kim HJ, Zhang A, Bhattacharya R, Yarema KJ, “Comparative evaluation of chitosan, cellulose acetate, and polyethersulfonenanofiber scaffolds for neural differentiation”. Carbohydrate Polymers, 99,483-490, 2014
  13. Salah R, Michaud P, Mati F, Harrat Z, Lounici H, Abdi N, Drouiche N, Mameri N. “Anticancer activity of chemically prepa