Journals / Uygulamalı Yerbilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Engineering Application of Geophysical and Geotechnical Methods: A Field Example at Yalova

Jeofizik ve Geoteknik Metotlarla Mühendislik Uygulamaları: Yalova'da Arazi Uygulaması

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2016-07-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Geologic features such as cracks/faults were not detected in the investigation area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Geophysical and geotechnical investigations were conducted in the Gaziosmanpaşa district of Yalova in order to investigate the physical properties of near surface sediments for the construction project.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Seismic refraction and Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) applied at 10 points and mechanical soundings were operated at 16 points.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Geologic features such as cracks/faults were not detected in the investigation area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Geophysical and geotechnical investigations were conducted in the Gaziosmanpaşa district of Yalova in order to investigate the physical properties of near surface sediments for the construction project. Seismic refraction and Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) applied at 10 points and mechanical soundings were operated at 16 points. Disturbed/undisturbed soil samples were collected and Standart Penetration Tests (SPT) were conducted at every 1.5 m in the drill-holes. The results of investigation indicated that below the cover layer of about 1.4 m in thickness at the surface, silty clay layer with the thickness of 4-4.5 m was placed overlying the sand layer. The bearing capacity of the silty layer was determined between qu=2.86-3.04 kg/cm2 and that of sand layer between qu=6.23- 11.38 kg/cm2. Geologic features such as cracks/faults were not detected in the investigation area.

Özet

Yalova ili, Gaziosmanpaşa mahallesinde yapılaşma amacıyla temellerin oturacağı yakın yüzey formasyonlarının fiziksel özelliklerini ortaya çıkartmak amacıyla jeofizik ve geoteknik araştırmalar yapılmıştır. 10 noktada sismik kırılma ve Schlumberger elektrot dizilimli Düşey Elektrik sondajı (DES), 16 noktada ise mekanik temel sondajı yapılmış ve kuyuların içinden her 1,5 m de bir bozulmuş/bozulmamış zemin örnekleri toplanmış ve Standart Penetrasyon Deneyi (SPT) gerçeklenmiştir. Yapılan çalışmalar neticesinde inceleme alanında üstte kalınlığı 1.4 m civarında değişen örtü tabakasının altında kalınlığı 4–4.5 m olan siltli kil tabakasının geldiği, bu tabakanın altında ise kum tabakasının yer aldığı saptanmıştır. Siltli kilin taşıma gücü qu=2.86–3.04 kg/cm2 ve kumunki ise qu=6.23–11.38 kg/cm2 arasında tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma alanında kırık/fay gibi jeolojik özellikler gözlenmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, A., KURTULUŞ, C. (2016). Engineering Application of Geophysical and Geotechnical Methods: A Field Example at Yalova. Uygulamalı Yerbilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/847939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AFET İŞL. GN. MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ, 2007. 03 Mayıs 2007 tarih, 26511 Sayılı Resmi Gazetede yayımlanarak yürürlüğe giren Deprem Bölgelerinde Yapılacak Binalar Hakkındaki Yönetmelik, Ankara.
  2. AKARTUNA, M., 1968. Armutlu yarımadasının jeolojisi, İÜ Fen Fak. Monografileri, 20, 105s. BARGU, S. SAKINÇ, M., 1989. İznik körfezi-İznik gölü arasında kalan bölgenin jeolojisi ve yapısal özellikleri, İÜ Müh. Fak. Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 6, 45-76.
  3. DELGADO J., ALFARO P., GALINDO-ZALDIVAR J., JABALOY A., LOPEZ GARRIDO A. C., and SANZ DE GALDEANO C., 2002. Structure of the Padul-Niguelas Basin (S Spain) from H/V ratios of ambient noise: application of the method to study peat and coarse sediments Pure Appl. Geophys. 159 2733–49.
  4. DELGADO J., LOPEZ C. C., ESTEVEZ A., GINER J., GUENCA A., and MOLINA S., 2000a. Mapping soft soils in the Segura river valley (SE Spain): a case study of microtremors as an exploration tool, J. Appl. Geophys. 45 19–32.
  5. DELGADO J., LOPEZ C. C., GINER J., ESTEVEZ A., CUENCA A., and MOLINA S., 2000b. Microtremors as a geophysical exploration tool: applications and limitations, Pure Appl. Geophys. 157 1445–62. ERENDİL M.; AKSAY, A.; KUŞÇU L., ORAL, A.; TUNAY, G. VE TEMREN, A. 1991. Bolu Masifi ve çevresinin jeolojisi: MTA Arşivi Rap. 9425, (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  6. GÖNCÜOĞLU, M.C.; ÖZCAN, A.: TURHAN, N. VE IŞIK, A., 1992. Stratigraphy of the Kütahya region: International Symposium on the Geology of the Black Sea Region (ISGB). Guide Book, 3- 8, Ankara.
  7. HOLTZ, W.G., GIBBS, H.J., 1956. Engineering Properties Of Expansive Clays, Transactions, ASCE, Vol. 121, pp. 641-677.
  8. KLIMIS N. S., PAPAZACHOS C. B., and EFREMIDIS CH. F., 1999. Determination of the behavior of a sedimentary rock mass: comparison of measured static and dynamic properties, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Rock Mechanics (Paris, France). LEONARDS, G.A., 1962. Foundation Engineering. Mc Graw Hill Book Comp., New York,1136 s. LUNA R. and JADI H., 2000. Determination of dynamic soil properties using geophysical methods Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on the Application of Geophysical and NDT Methodologies to Transportation Facilities and Infrastructure Geophysics, (Federal Highway Administration, Saint Louis, MO) vol 3 pp 1–15. OTHMAN A. A. A., 2005. Construed geotechnical characteristics of foundation beds by seismic measurements, J. Geophys. Eng., 2 126–38.
  9. PAROLAI S., BORMAN P. and MILKREIT C., 2001. Assessment of the natural frequency of the sedimentary cover in the Cologne area (Germany) using noise measurements, J. Earth