Journals / Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of small signal stability with different PSS models and UPFC-POD in power systems

Güç sistemlerinde farklı PSS modelleri ve UPFC-POD ile küçük sinyal kararlılığının incelenmesi

Pages
11–22
Publication Date
2022-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, angular velocity, voltage, active and reactive power comparisons were made in the use of different PSS models with UPFC-POD, and small signal stability analyzes were interpreted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The damping of small frequency oscillations is an important issue in terms of power system stability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Small signal stability analysis was carried out in a 2-field, 4-machine system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, angular velocity, voltage, active and reactive power comparisons were made in the use of different PSS models with UPFC-POD, and small signal stability analyzes were interpreted.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Güç sistemleri · Küçük sinyal kararlılığı · Farklı PSS modelleri

Abstract

The damping of small frequency oscillations is an important issue in terms of power system stability. These oscillations are damped by the power system stabilizer (PSS). In recent years, power electronics based Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices have been used efficiently in power system stability studies. In this study, different PSS models, the most advanced model of FACTS devices Unified Power Flow Control (UPFC) and Power Oscillation Damping (POD) were used to provide coordination controller. In addition to PSS models used in synchronous generators, Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) and Turbine Governor (TG) models were also used. Small signal stability analysis was carried out in a 2-field, 4-machine system. Power Systems Analysis Program (PSAT) was used for the simulation study. As a result of the study, angular velocity, voltage, active and reactive power comparisons were made in the use of different PSS models with UPFC-POD, and small signal stability analyzes were interpreted.

Özet

Düşük frekanslı salınımların sönümlenmesi güç sistemleri kararlılığı açısından önemli bir konudur. Bu salınımlar güç sistemi kararlı kılıcısı (PSS) tarafından sönümlenmektedir. Son yıllarda güç elektroniği tabanlı Esnek AC İletim Sistemi (FACTS) cihazları güç sistemlerinde kararlılığı çalışmalarında verimli bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada farklı PSS modelleri, FACTS cihazlarının en gelişmiş olan Birleştirilmiş Güç Akışı Kontrolü (UPFC) ve Güç Salınım Sönümlemesi (POD) modeli birlikte koordinasyon kontrolünün sağlanması amacıyla kullanılmıştır. Senkron generatörlerde kullanılan PSS modellerinin yanı sıra Otomatik Gerilim Regülatörü (AVR) ve Türbin Yöneticisi (TG) modelleri de kullanılmıştır. 2 alanlı, 4 makinalı güç sisteminde küçük sinyal kararlılığı analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Benzetim çalışması için Güç Sistemleri Analizi Programı (PSAT) kullanılmıştır. Yapılan çalışma neticesinde farklı PSS modellerin UPFC-POD ile birlikte kullanılmasında açısal hız, gerilim, aktif ve reaktif güç karşılaştırmaları yapılmış olup, küçük sinyal kararlılığı analizleri yorumlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBAŞ, M., DÖŞOĞLU, M. K. (2022). Investigation of small signal stability with different PSS models and UPFC-POD in power systems. Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 11–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/847347

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ayres HM, Kopcak I, Castro MS, Milano F, Da Costa VF. A didactic procedure for designing power oscillation dampers of FACTS devices. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 18(6), 896-909, 2010.
  2. Martins LFB, Araujo PB, Fortes EV, Miotto E., Gamino BR. Design of the PSSs, PI–UPFC and PI–UPFC–POD controllers using the Firefly Algorithm The 12th Latin American Congress on Electricity Generation and Transmission, Mar del Plata, Argentina, 12-15 Kasım 2017.
  3. Dhurvey SN, Chandrakar VK. Optimized POD in coordination with UPFC for damping of power system oscillations. 43rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference, Padova, Italy, 1-4 Eylül 2008.
  4. Pandey RK, Singh NK. UPFC control parameter identification for effective power oscillation damping. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 31(6), 269-276, 2009.
  5. Furini MA, Pereira ALS, Araujo PB. Pole placement by coordinated tuning of Power System Stabilizers and FACTS-POD stabilizers. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 33(3), 615-622, 2011.
  6. Magaji N, Mustafa MW. Relative gain array Interaction Analysis of UPFC Device for damping Oscillations. International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, 2(5), 124-132, 2011.
  7. Makkar CR, Dewan L. Simultaneous coordination of Power System Stabilizer and UPFC for improving dynamic stability of multimachine system. IEEE 6th India International Conference on Power Electronics, Kurukshetra, India, 8-10 Kasım 2014.
  8. Hussain AN, Malek F, Rashid MA, Mohamed L, Mohd Affendi NA. Optimal coordinated design of multiple damping controllers based on PSS and UPFC device to improve dynamic stability in the power system. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-15, 2013. Sadikovic R. Use of FACTS devices for power flow control and damping of oscillations in power systems. Doctoral dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 2006.
  9. Dudgeon GJ, Leithead WE, Dysko A, o'Reilly J, McDonald JR. The effective role of AVR and PSS in power systems: Frequency response analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22(4), 1986-1994, 2007.
  10. Dysko A, Leithead WE, O'Reilly J. Enhanced power system stability by coordinated PSS design. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25(1), 413-422, 2009. Ramos RA. Stability analysis of power systems considering AVR and PSS output limiters. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 31(4), 153-159, 2009.
  11. Demirbaş M, Döşoğlu MK. Çok makinalı güç sistemlerinde farklı AVR m