Journals / The Ulutas Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Association of the Zwolle Score with Fragmented QRS Complex: A Combined Prognostic Tool for Primary Angioplasty in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarctions

Pages
66–76
Publication Date
2016-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: In the fQRS group compared with the non-fQRS group, wider QRS 105.2±9.7 vs. 88±7.1, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: We aimed to introduce the prognostic value of simultaneously calculated fragmented QRS and Zwolle scores as a new scoring system in primary PCI of the STEMI patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These two groups according to whether Zwolle score ≥3 were also classified as high Zwolle score with fQRS complex, high Zwolle score with the non-fQRS complex, the low Zwolle score with fQRS complex, and low Zwolle score with the non-fQRS complex group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: In the fQRS group compared with the non-fQRS group, wider QRS 105.2±9.7 vs. 88±7.1, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Zwolle score · fragmented QRS · acute myocardial infarction

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to introduce the prognostic value of simultaneously calculated fragmented QRS and Zwolle scores as a new scoring system in primary PCI of the STEMI patients. Method: Two hundred fifty-nine STEMI patients were classified as fragmented QRS complex group fQRS and non-fragmented QRS complex group non-fQRS according to the fragmentation of QRS complex in electrocardiography. These two groups according to whether Zwolle score ≥3 were also classified as high Zwolle score with fQRS complex, high Zwolle score with the non-fQRS complex, the low Zwolle score with fQRS complex, and low Zwolle score with the non-fQRS complex group. The hospitalization data of the patients were analyzed. Results: In the fQRS group compared with the non-fQRS group, wider QRS 105.2±9.7 vs. 88±7.1, p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKURT, A., YİLDİZ, A., YİLDİZ, C., BASBUG, H. S. (2016). Association of the Zwolle Score with Fragmented QRS Complex: A Combined Prognostic Tool for Primary Angioplasty in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarctions. The Ulutas Medical Journal, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 66–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/844514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Räber L, Kelbæk H, Ostojic M, Baumbach A, Heg D, Tüller D, et al. Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardialinfarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial. JAMA 2012;308:777-787.
  2. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A, Cairns R, Murphy SA, de Lemos JA, et al. TIMI Risk Score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation. Circulation. 2000;102:2031-2037.
  3. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, van 't Hof AW, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Dambrink JH, et al. Prognostic assessment of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: implications for early discharge.Circulation 2004;109:2737-2743.
  4. Addala S, Grines CL, Dixon SR, Stone GW, Boura JA, Ochoa AB, et al. Predicting mortality in patients with ST-elevationmyocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PAMI riskscore). Am J Cardiol 2004; 93:629 -632. Halkin A, Singh M, Nikolsky E, Grines CL, Tcheng JE, Garcia E, et al. Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneouscoronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score. J Am CollCardiol 2005;45:1397-1405.
  5. Das MK, Suradi H, Maskoun W, Michael MA, et al. Fragmented wide QRS on a 12-lead ECG: a sign of myocardial scar and poor prognosis.CircArrhythmElectrophysiol.2008;1:258-268.
  6. Das MK, Khan B, Jacob S, Kumar A, Mahenthiran J. Significance of a Fragmented QRS Complex Versus a Q Wave in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 2006;113:2495-2501.
  7. Das MK, Michael MA, Suradi H, Peng J, Sinha A, Shen C, et al. Usefulness of fragmented QRS on a 12-lead electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndrome for predicting mortality. Am J Cardiol;104:1631-1637.
  8. Korhonen P, Husa T, Konttila T, Tierala I, Mäkijärvi M, Väänänen H, et al. Fragmented QRS in prediction of cardiac deaths and heart failure hospitalizations after myocardial infarction. Ann Non invasive Electrocardiol2010;15:130-137.
  9. Das MK, Saha C, El Masry H, Peng J, Dandamudi G, Mahenthiran J, et al. Fragmented QRS on a 12-lead ECG: a predictor of mortality and cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:1385-1392.
  10. Pietrasik G, Goldenberg I, Zdzienicka J, Moss AJ, Zareba W. Prognostic significance of fragmented QRS complex for predicting the risk of recurrent cardiac events in patients with Q-wave myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol2007;