SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Ulutas Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Effect of Coasting on Success of In-Vitro Fertilization Cycles

Dilek Benk SİLFELER
İsmet GUN
Raziye Keskin KURT
Ali OVAYOLU
Kenan SOFUOGLU
Tayfun KUTLU
Naciye ARAT
Pages
101–106
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: E2 levels on the day of hCG in group 2 were significiantly lower than group 1 4332.6±256.6 and 3180.8±702.9; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: “Coasting” is a method used in prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome OHSS during In Vitro Fertilization IVF cycles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of our study is to evaluate coasting effect on IVF oucomes in patients with E2 levels of 4000-5000 pikogram.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: E2 levels on the day of hCG in group 2 were significiantly lower than group 1 4332.6±256.6 and 3180.8±702.9; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Coasting · in-vitro fertilization · E2 levels

Abstract

Introduction: “Coasting” is a method used in prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome OHSS during In Vitro Fertilization IVF cycles. Coasting refers to witholding exogenous gonodotropine usage and delaying the administration of hCG in high risk cycles until serum estradiol levels falls into an acceptable range. The aim of our study is to evaluate coasting effect on IVF oucomes in patients with E2 levels of 4000-5000 pikogram. Method: This study was a single centered, retrospective and a case-control study. Study population were selected from women applied Zeynep Kamil Research Hospital IVF department between January 2003 and December 2013 n:7850 . Patients were divided in 2 groups as conrol group Group 1, n:48 and coasted group Group 2, n:34 according to whether or not coasting performed. Results: E2 levels on the day of hCG in group 2 were significiantly lower than group 1 4332.6±256.6 and 3180.8±702.9; p

🔖

Cite This Article

SİLFELER, D. B., GUN, İ., KURT, R. K., OVAYOLU, A., SOFUOGLU, K., KUTLU, T., ARAT, N. (2016). Effect of Coasting on Success of In-Vitro Fertilization Cycles. The Ulutas Medical Journal, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 101–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/844501

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aljawoan FY, Hunt LP, Gordon UD. Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in coasted patients in an IVF/ICSI program. J Hum Reprod Sci 2012
  2. 5(1): 32–36. 2. Vitthala S, Bouaziz J, Tozer A, Zosmer A, Al-Shawaf T. Serum FSH Levels in Coasting Programmes on the hCG Day and Their Clinical Outcomes in IVF±ICSI Cycles. Int J Endocrinol 2012: 540681 3. Mathur R, Evbuomwan I, Jenkins J. Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2002
  3. 111–116. 4. Abulghar MA, Mansour RT. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update 2003
  4. 9(3): 275–289 5. Al-Shawaf T, Zosmer A, Hussain A et al. Prevention ofsevere ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in IVF with orwithout ICSI and embryo transfer: a modified coasting”strategy based on ultrasound for identification of high-riskpatients. Hum Reprod 2001
  5. 16(1): 24–30 6. Sher G, Zouves C, Feinman M, and Maassarani G. Prolonged coasting: an elective method for preventing severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1995
  6. 10(12): 3107–3109 7. Benadiva CA, Moomjy M, Davis O, Liu HC, Kligman I, and Rosenwaks Z. Withholding gonadotropin administration is an elective alternative for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 1997
  7. 67(4): 724–727 8. Tortoriello DV, McGovern PG, Colon JM, Skurnick JH, Lipetz K, Santoro N. “Coasting” does not adversely affect cycle outcome in a subset of highly responsive in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 1998
  8. 69(3): 454–460 10. D’Angelo A, Amso N. Coasting (withholding gonadotrophins) for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 15
  9. Grochowski D, Wołczyński S, Kuczyński W et al. Timed coasting reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and gives good cycle outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Gynecol Endocrinol 2001
  10. 15(3): 234–238 12. Ulug U, Bahceci M, Erden HF, Shalev E, Ben-Shlomo I. The significance of coasting duration during ovarian stimulation for conception in assisted fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 2002
  11. 17(2): 310–313 13. Nardo LG, Cheema P, Gelbaya TA et al. The optimal length of “coasting protocol” in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2006
  12. 9(3): 175–180 14. Cao XW, Lin K, Li CY, Yuan CW. A review of WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examinatio