Journals / The Ulutas Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Dengue Viral Infection and Necessity for Screening Patients Having Pyrexia of Unknown Origin

Pages
49–53
Publication Date
2017-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It will be useful to reduce the increased financial burden due to PUO missed diagnosis and management in underdeveloped countries like one of ours.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dengue Viral Infection DVI is an emerging global health problem infecting about 50-100 million people annually worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:More than 2.5 million people have dengue hemorrhagic fever DHF and dengue shock syndrome DSS .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It will be useful to reduce the increased financial burden due to PUO missed diagnosis and management in underdeveloped countries like one of ours.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dengue viral infection · Pyrexia of unknown origin · Screeing for PUO

Abstract

Dengue Viral Infection DVI is an emerging global health problem infecting about 50-100 million people annually worldwide. More than 2.5 million people have dengue hemorrhagic fever DHF and dengue shock syndrome DSS . Aedesaegypti is the principal vector for disease transmission while humans are the main reservoir. The clinical manifestations range from self-limited Dengue fever DF to complicated and fatal outcomes, DHF and DSS. DF is prevalent in more than 100 countries of the world. More than 2.5 billion people of the World’s population are residents of Dengue endemic area. According to one reported study, the prevalence of DF in Pakistan is 29%. Similarly, one study result carried out in India has shown 78% prevalence of DF. In Mexico, the one published seroprevalence study showed 79.6% prevalence of DF. A review/analysis report of the Gynecological and Obstetrical survey from 30 published studies has shown 64% transmission rate of DF from a mother to a child. The study results carried out in Jamaica has shown an increase in the prevalence of DF in seen in less than 1year and more than 60 years. The mortality rate with DHF is 33%. While in less than 15 years of it is 5%. This can be only reduced with early/accurate diagnosis and the prompt management of the condition. The absence of specific vaccine and antiviral is responsible for making this infection as a global health problem. The US government has spent 15 million US dollars for the establishment and discovery of specific DF treatment. The study carried out in India has shown the median cost for treatment per patient about 432.2 US dollars. It is 4 times in case of private health sectors. The proposed review article will highlight the incidence of dengue infection in patients having PUO pyrexia of unknown origin . It will be a guide for the clinicians to consider DVI in their list of differential diagnosis of PUO. Moreover, it will be helpful in establishing the screening policies for DVI in PUO. The resultant of all of this will improve the life quality of PUO sufferers. It will be useful to reduce the increased financial burden due to PUO missed diagnosis and management in underdeveloped countries like one of ours.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZAFAR, H., BUKHARİ, K. T., HUMAYOUN, S., NOOR, N., LAKHNANA, N. K. (2017). Dengue Viral Infection and Necessity for Screening Patients Having Pyrexia of Unknown Origin. The Ulutas Medical Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 49–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/844479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Stephen JP. Dengue ‘Break Bone’ Fever: Will it spread like West Nile Virus? EEM. 2008; 30(3): 14-16
  2. Reed W. New U.S army mosquito control technology licensed for deployment against dengue.Website:www. medicalnewstoday.com/articles/130061.php. Retrieved on 4th April 2011
  3. Gubler DJ. WHO Dengue Bulletin [homepage on Internet]. Dengue/Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever.1997
  4. Website: http://www.searo.who.int/Section10/Section332/section51 9_2380.htm
  5. Smith AW, Chen LH, Massuda E, Wilson ME. Threat of Dengue to blood safety in Dengue endemic country. Web site:http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/586772. Retriev on 14th July 2009
  6. Heyman D, Chakarborty T. Deadly diseases and epidemics. Dengue Fever and other hemorrhagic viruses. WHO 2008 (InfoBase Publishing
  7. Osman O, Fong MY, Sekaran SD. Genetic characterization of Dengue virus type 1 isolated in Brunei in 2005-6. J Gen Virol. 2009; 90: 678-86
  8. Egger JR, Ooi EE, Kelly DW, Woolhouse MK, Davies CR, Coleman PG. Reconstructing historical changes in the force of infection of DF in Singapore: Implications for surveillance and control. WHO Bull. 2008; 86(3): 161-240
  9. Shu PY, Huang JH. Curent advances in Dengue diagnosis. Clin and Diagnos Lab Immunol. 2004; 11(4): 642-50
  10. Bakar SA, Wong PF, Chan YF. Emergence of Dengue virus type 4 genotype in Malaysia. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:2437-42. 10.Khan E, Hassan R, Mehraj V, Nasr A, Siddiqui J,Hewson R. Co circulation of two genotypes of Dengue virus in 2006 out break of DHF in Karachi, Pakistan. J ClinVirol. 2006; 43(2): 176-9. 11.Jacquelin L, Harris E, Wills B, Balmaseda A, Nadia S, Rocha Cet al.TheWHO Dengue classification and case definitions: Time for reassessment. The Lancet. 2006; 368: 170-3. 12.Schieffelin JS, Costin JM, Nicholson CO, OrgeronNM, Fontaine KA, Isern S et al. Neutralizing and non neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against Dengue virus E protein derived from a naturally infected patient. Virol J. 2010; 7: 28. 13.Almani SA, Rahpoto MQ, Shah MI, Shaiku M, Memon AI. Dengue fever at Liaquat University Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. Med Channel. 2008; 14: 2. 14.Muhammad Qasim. 49 DF cases reported in Rawalpindi 5 expired. THE NEWS. Saturday 1st Nov 2008. 15.Smith AW, Schwuartz AW. Dengue in travelers. N Eng J 2005; 353: 924- 32. 16.Madiha S, Syeda UR, Habiba M, Zahid R, Bashir A, Rabbani M, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding DF among adults of high and low socioeconomic groups. JPMA. 2010; 60: 243. 17.Wichmannn O, Gascon J, Schmu