Journals / The Journal of Turkish Phytopathology / 2016 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

The Comparison of Sensitivity of Various Methods in The Detection of Olive Tree Viruses

Pages
1–13
Publication Date
2016-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that all samples were infected with the any of viruses entitled Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), Cherry leafroll virus (CLRV), Strawberry latent ringspot virus (SLRSV) and Cucumis mosaic virus (CMV) by RT-PCR while ArMV was present in only 5 samples in DAS-ELISA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To compare the sensivity of different methods used to detect the agents of viral diseases in olive trees, totaly 375 samples of leaves, fruits and flowers were collected from olive trees in Aydın, Balikesir and Izmir provinces and for further studies, 27 samples were selected from 375 ones as a one representative sample from each of counties in these provinces.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The existence of 9 viral agents in these samples was checked by RT-PCR while the detection of 4 viruses was done with DAS-ELISA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that all samples were infected with the any of viruses entitled Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), Cherry leafroll virus (CLRV), Strawberry latent ringspot virus (SLRSV) and Cucumis mosaic virus (CMV) by RT-PCR while ArMV was present in only 5 samples in DAS-ELISA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:375 samples
⚙️Variables:Olive · Virus

Abstract

To compare the sensivity of different methods used to detect the agents of viral diseases in olive trees, totaly 375 samples of leaves, fruits and flowers were collected from olive trees in Aydın, Balikesir and Izmir provinces and for further studies, 27 samples were selected from 375 ones as a one representative sample from each of counties in these provinces. The existence of 9 viral agents in these samples was checked by RT-PCR while the detection of 4 viruses was done with DAS-ELISA. When the juice from the samples was inoculated to certain test plants, they did not produce any symptoms. It was found that all samples were infected with the any of viruses entitled Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), Cherry leafroll virus (CLRV), Strawberry latent ringspot virus (SLRSV) and Cucumis mosaic virus (CMV) by RT-PCR while ArMV was present in only 5 samples in DAS-ELISA. Moreover, all samples in this study were free from Olive latent-1 virus (OLV-1), Olive latent-2 virus (OLV-2), Olive latent-3 virus (OLV-3), Olive latent ringspot virus (OLRSV) and Olive leaf yellowing-associated virus (OLYaV) by RT-PCR. The results of RT-PCR showed that the samples from 3 trees having virus-like symptoms were infected with a virus and on the contrary, 24 samples from the trees which were determined to be infected with viruses did not demonstrated any virus symptoms. In conclusion, it was concluded that RT-PCR was the most sensitive method in the detection of the viruses in olive trees at this moment and has the potential usage on the applications of quarantine and certification programs in safety.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

Erilmez, S. (2016). The Comparison of Sensitivity of Various Methods in The Detection of Olive Tree Viruses. The Journal of Turkish Phytopathology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 1–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/844271

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alabdullah, A., El Beaino, T., Saponari, M., Hallak, H. and Digiaro, M., 2005. Preliminary evaluation of the status of olive-infecting viruses in Syria. EPPO Bulettin 35 (2): 249-252.
  2. Alabdullah, A., Elbeaino, T., Minafra A., Digiaro, M. and Martelli G.P., 2009. Detection and variability of olive latent virus 3 in the mediterranean region. Journal of Plant Pathology 91 (3): 521–525.
  3. Bertolini, E., Fadda, Z., Garcia, F., Celada, B., Olmos, A., Gorris, M. T., Del Rio, C., Caballero, J., Duran-Vila, N. and Cambra, M., 1998. Virus diseases of olive detected in Spain. New diagnostic methods. Phytoma Espaňa 102: 191-193.
  4. Bertolini, E., Olmos, A., Gorris, M.T., Martinez, M.C. and Cambra, M., 2001, Single-step multiplex RT-PCR for simultaneous and colourimetric detection of six RNA viruses in olive trees. J. Virol. Methods 96: 33-41.
  5. Bora, T. ve Karaca, İ., 1970, Kültür Bitkilerinde Hastalığın ve Zararın Ölçülmesi, E.Ü. Zir. Fak. Yardımcı Ders Kitabı. No: 167. Bornova 43 p. Brunt, A.A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M.J., Gibbs, A.J., Watson, L. and Zurcher, E.J., 1996, `Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database. Version: 20th August 1996. URL http://biology.anu.edu.au/Groups/MES/vide/ (Erişim tarihi: 25 Ağustos 2012).
  6. Çağlayan, K., U. Fidan, G. Tarla, and M. Gazel, 2004. First report of olive viruses in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology, 86 (1): 89-90.
  7. Çağlayan, K., Faggioli, F. and Barba, M. 2011. Viruses, phytoplasmas and diseases of unknown etiology of olive viruses. In: Virus and Virus-like Diseases of Pome and Stone Fruits (Eds. A. Hadidi, M. Barba, T. Candresse, W. Jelkmann). APS Press. p. 289-297.
  8. Candresse, T., Lannneau,T., Revers, F., Grasseau, N., Macquaire, G., German, S., Malinowsky, T., Dunez, J., 1995. An immunocapture PCR assay adapted to the detection and theanalysis of the moleculer varibality of apple chlorotic leafspotvirus. Acta Horticulturae, 386: 136-147.
  9. Cardoso, J.M.S., Felix, M.R.,Clara, M.I.E and Oliveira, S., 2005. The complete genome sequence of a new necro virus isolated from Olea europea L. Archives of Virology. 150: 815-823.
  10. Çavuşoğlu, A., 1980, Ege Bölgesinin Belli Başlı Yerli ve Yabancı Zeytin Çeşitlerinin Pomolojik Özellikleri Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Sonuç Raporu. Zeytincilik Araştırma Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  11. Clark, M.F. and Adams, A.N., 1977, Characteristic of microplate method of enzyme-linked immunusorbent assay for detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol., 34: 475-483.
  12. Erilmez, S. ve Erkan, S., 2014.
  13. Aydın, Ba