SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Journal of Eurasia Sport Sciences and Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Examination of Psychological Resilience Levels of Basketball and Tennis Players Considering the Gender Variable

Alpay BÜLBÜL
Gamze AKYOL
Hacı Murat ŞAHİN
Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2020-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the research results, it is concluded that constitutional style, perception of future and social competence psychological resilience sub-dimensions of the tennis players are better than basketball players, family cohesion, social competence and social resources sub-dimensions and total psychological resilience perception of female players are more successful than male players.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study pursued in order to determine the psychological resilience levels of individuals who are interested in basketball and tennis sports in university teams and the differences between them considering the gender variable, gender variable levels are given in percentages, and resilience levels have been studied by comparing with their gender with the T-test.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Population consists of 50 female and 51 male players and 30 female and 30 male tennis players, in total 161 players.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the research results, it is concluded that constitutional style, perception of future and social competence psychological resilience sub-dimensions of the tennis players are better than basketball players, family cohesion, social competence and social resources sub-dimensions and total psychological resilience perception of female players are more successful than male players.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Psychological Resilience · Gender Variable · Tennis

Abstract

In the study pursued in order to determine the psychological resilience levels of individuals who are interested in basketball and tennis sports in university teams and the differences between them considering the gender variable, gender variable levels are given in percentages, and resilience levels have been studied by comparing with their gender with the T-test. Population consists of 50 female and 51 male players and 30 female and 30 male tennis players, in total 161 players. In order to determine to resilience levels of the players, “Psychological resilience scale” developed by Friborg et al. (2005) has been applied. According to the research results, it is concluded that constitutional style, perception of future and social competence psychological resilience sub-dimensions of the tennis players are better than basketball players, family cohesion, social competence and social resources sub-dimensions and total psychological resilience perception of female players are more successful than male players.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜLBÜL, A., AKYOL, G., ŞAHİN, H. M. (2020). Examination of Psychological Resilience Levels of Basketball and Tennis Players Considering the Gender Variable. The Journal of Eurasia Sport Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/844169

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Basım, H.N., & Çetin, F. (2011). Yetişkinler için Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeği'nin Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Çalışması, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. Bolger, K. E., Patterson, C. J., Thompson W. W., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1995). Psychosocial adjustment among children experiencing persistent and intermittent family economic hardship. Child Development, 66, 1107-1129.
  2. Crowley, B. J., Hayslip, B., & Hobdy, J. (2003). Psychological hardiness and adjustment to life events in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 10(4), 237-248.
  3. Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2012). A grounded theory of psychological resilience in Olympic champions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 669–678.
  4. Friborg, O., Barlaug, D., Martinussen, M., & ark. (2005) Resilience in Relation to Personality and Intelligence. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 14(1), 29-42.
  5. Greeff, A. P., & Human, B. (2004). Resilience in families in which a parent has died. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 27-42.
  6. Galli, N., & Vealey, R. S. (2008). “Bouncing back” from adversity: Athletes’ experiences of resilience. The Sport Psychologist, 22, 316–335.
  7. Hannah, T. E., & Morrisey, C. (1986). Correlates of psychological hardiness in Canadian adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1271(4), 339-344.
  8. Harrisson, M., Loiselle, C. G., Duquette, A., & Semenic, S. E. (2002). Hardiness, work support and psychological distress among nursing assistants and registered nurses in Quebec. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(6), 584-591.
  9. Hortaçsu, N. (2003). Çocuklukta ilişkiler: Ana baba, kardeş ve arkadaşlar (1.Baskı). Ankara:
  10. İmge Kitabevi.
  11. Kumpfer, K. L. (1999). Factors and processes contributing to resilience: the resilience framework. (Ed: M. D. Glantz ve J. L. Johnson) Resilience anddevelopment: Positive life adaptations. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  12. Konter, E. (2003). Myths and truhts in sport psychology applications. Dokuz Eylül Yayıncılık, İzmir Luthar, S. (1999). Poverty and children’s adjustment. New-bury Park, CA: Sage. Maddi, S. R., Harvey, R. H., Khoshaba, D. M., Lu, J. L., Persico, M., & Brow, M. (2006). The personality construct of hardiness, III: Relationships with repression, innovativeness, authoritarianism, and performance. Journal of Personality, 74(2), 575-598.
  13. MacNamara, A., Button, A., & Collins, D. (2010a). The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance. Part 1: Identifying mental skills and behaviors. The Sport Psychologist, 24, 52–73. MacNama