Journals / The International Journal of Human and Behavioral Science / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Subjective Well-Being in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2017-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings highlight the possibility that a consideration of subjective well-being for body image concerns.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present research was to examine the relationships between positive affect(PA), negative affect (NA), life satisfaction (LS) and scoliosis research society variables; image, pain, function and mental health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the current study female scoliosis patients (N=83) completed three measures of positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS), Life satisfaction Scale and Scoliosis Research Society-22.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings highlight the possibility that a consideration of subjective well-being for body image concerns.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Keywords: İdiopathic Scoliosis · Subjective Well-being · Life Satisfaction

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to examine the relationships between positive affect(PA), negative affect (NA), life satisfaction (LS) and scoliosis research society variables; image, pain, function and mental health. To determine whether PA, NA and LS predicted by image, pain, function and mental health a hierarchical regression analysis was specified. In the current study female scoliosis patients (N=83) completed three measures of positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS), Life satisfaction Scale and Scoliosis Research Society-22. Result showed that four factors accounted for subjective well-being variables (PA, NA, LS). The findings highlight the possibility that a consideration of subjective well-being for body image concerns.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUZU, D., BERK, Ö. S., AYDIN, F. Y. (2017). Subjective Well-Being in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. The International Journal of Human and Behavioral Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/844133

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alanay, A., Cil, A., Berk, H., Acaroglu, R. E., Yazici, M., Akcali, O., et al (2005).Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine, 30(21), 2464-2468.
  2. Asher, M., Lai, S. M., Burton, D., & Manna, B. (2003). The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 28(1), 63-69.
  3. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine. Carrasco, M. I. B., & Ruiz, M. C. S. (2014). Perceived self-image in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an integrative review of the literature. Revista da escola de enfermagem da USP, 48(4), 748-757.
  4. Cash, T.F. (2006). Body image and plastic surgery. In D. B. Sarwer et al. (Eds), Psychological aspects of reconstructive and cosmetic surgery: Clinical, empirical, and ethical perspectives (pp. 37-59). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Danielsson, A. J., Wiklund, I., Pehrsson, K., & Nachemson, A. L. (2001). Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. European spine journal, 10(4), 278-288.
  5. Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In Diener E. (Ed.), Assessing well-being (67-100). Netherlands: Springer. Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity. Applied psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(1), 1-43.
  6. Durak, M., Gençöz, T., & Senol-Durak, E. (2008). The reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale in the samples of Turkish elderly and correctional officers. In IV European conference on positive psychology, Rijeka-Opatija, Crotia. Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve negatif duygu ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk psikoloji dergisi, 15(46), 19-26.
  7. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1990). Subjective well-being and coping with adversity. Social Indicators Research, 22(4), 327-349.
  8. Kotwicki, T. (2008). Evaluation of scoliosis today: examination, X-rays and beyond. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(10), 742-751.
  9. LaMontagne, L. L., Hepworth, J. T., Cohen, F., & Salisbury, M. H. (2003). Cognitive behavioral intervention effects on adolescen