Journals / Turkish Studies (Elektronik) / 2019 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 7

A NEW APPROACH FOR THE STUDENTS OF 21ST CENTURY: COGNITIVE COACHING

21. YÜZYIL ÖĞRENCİLERİ İÇİN YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: BİLİŞSEL KOÇLUK

Pages
4031–4057
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence by the help of this literature synthesis study it is thought that cognitive coaching practices on students will mount up and it will contribute to the field accordingly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are revolutionary changes in the field of education to keep up with the benefits of globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The necessity of taking the learner to the center within the framework of Roger’s (1951) humanistic psychology is also supported by educationalists.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence by the help of this literature synthesis study it is thought that cognitive coaching practices on students will mount up and it will contribute to the field accordingly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are revolutionary changes in the field of education to keep up with the benefits of globalization. The necessity of taking the learner to the center within the framework of Roger’s (1951) humanistic psychology is also supported by educationalists. It is clear that permanent solutions may be reached only if necessary support is given to the students for their cognitive-personal growth and lifelong learning process. Students should be on the focus of the educational system as autonomous individuals. Thus it is inevitable to apply new technics in educational settings not only to increase students’ achievement but also support them cognitively and personally. Therefore, cognitive coaching is foreground as one of the new support technics for students growth in educational settings. The initial mission of cognitive coaching is to enhance one’s ability to display high level of performance as autonomous individuals in terms of self-directedness and holonomy. Utilizing cognitive coaching in terms of innovation in educational settings becomes more of an issue on enhancing one’s own and another’s resourcefulness. Examining the research on the current field, it is observed that there is a number of research in which cognitive coaching was applied to teachers and the results were examined on behalf of educational system and students. However it is also investigated that there are few studies which observed the direct effects of cognitive coaching on students applying it to them. Hence by the help of this literature synthesis study it is thought that cognitive coaching practices on students will mount up and it will contribute to the field accordingly.

Özet

Globalleşmenin getirilerine ayak uydurabilmek için eğitim alanında da devrim niteliğinde değişimler olmaktadır. Rogers’ın (1951) hümanisttik psikoloji görüşü çerçevesinde öğreneni merkeze almanın gerekliliği eğitim uzmanlarınca da desteklenmektedir. Eğitim alanındaki bu değişim sürecin odağında bulunan öğrencilerin gelişimlerini ve hayat boyu öğrenme durumlarını destekledikçe kalıcı çözümlere ulaşabileceği açıktır. Zira içinde bulunduğumuz çağın gereği olarak yapılması gereken, öğrencileri özerk birer birey olarak eğitim sisteminin odak noktası haline getirmektir. Bu durumda da öğrencinin başarısının yanı sıra onu bilişsel ve kişisel olarak da geliştirmek ve desteklemek için yeni uygulamalara başvurmak kaçınılmazdır. Bu noktadan hareketle eğitim alanına kazandırılabilecek yeni yaklaşımlardan birisi de öğrencilere bilişsel koçluk uygulamalarıyla destek olmaktır. Bilişsel koçluğun temel misyonu; bilişsel kapasitesi ile hem bağımsız hem de bir topluluğun üyesi olarak yüksek performans sergileyebilen ve kendi kararlarını kendisi alarak uygulamaya geçirecek kapasiteye sahip, özerk bireyler yetiştirmektir. Eğitim sistemindeki yenileşme hareketleri kapsamında bilişsel koçluktan faydalanmak öğrencilerin hem kendi hem de başkalarındaki hüneri ortaya çıkarma noktasındaki gelişimleri için önem arz etmektedir. Bu alanda yapılmış olan çalışmalar incelendiğinde bilişsel koçluğun çoğunlukla öğretmenlere uygulandığı tespit edilmiş ve incelenen çalışmaların öğretmenlerdeki gelişimin eğitim ortamını ve öğrenciyi geliştirmesini saptamaya çalıştığı görülmüştür. Bunun yanı sıra öğrenciye uygulanan çalışmaların oldukça sınırlı olduğu ortaya çıkmış olup ve bu kavramın detaylıca açıklanmasının alana katkı sağlayacağı ve öğrenci bağlamında kullanım sıklığının artacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYILDIZ, S. T. (2019). A NEW APPROACH FOR THE STUDENTS OF 21ST CENTURY: COGNITIVE COACHING. Turkish Studies (Elektronik), Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 7, 4031–4057. https://ajindex.com/articles/84311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Alseike, B. U. 1997. Cognitive Coaching: Its influences on teachers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Awakuni, G. H. (1995). The impact of Cognitive Coaching as perceived by the Kalani High School core team (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 9613169) Baker, K. L. (2008). The Effects of Cognitive Coaching on Inıtıally Licensed Teachers. Master Thesis. Watson School of Education University of North Carolina Wilmington. Barkley, S. G. (2005). Quality Teaching in a Culture of Coaching. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education. Beltman, S. 2009. “Educators’ motivation for continuing professional learning”. Issues in Educational Research, 19(3), 193-211.
  2. Bjerken, K. S. 2013. Building self-directed teachers: A case study of teachers’ perspectives of the effects of Cognitive Coaching on professional practices (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Blaschke, L. & Hase, S 2014. Heutagogy, technology and lifelong learning: curriculum geared for professional and part-time learners. In A. Dailey-Herbert (ed.), Transforming processes and perspectives to reframe higher education. New York: Springer. Chang, D., Lee, C.-D., Wang, S.-C. 2014. “The influence of Cognitive Coaching on teaching reflection and teaching effectiveness: Taking teachers participating in formative teacher evaluation in elementary and secondary schools as examples”. Journal of University of Taipei, 45(1), 61-80.
  3. Clinard, L. M., Ariav, T., Beeson, R., Minor, L., Dwyer, M. 1995. “Cooperating teachers reflect upon the impact of coaching on their own teaching and professional life”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Cochran, B., Dechesere, J. (1995). Teacher empowerment through cognitive coaching. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 24(5), 24. Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision.Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Costa, A. L., Garmston, R. J. 2002. Cognitive Coaching A Foundation for Renaissance Schools. (2nd Ed.). The United States of America: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
  4. Costa, A. L., Garmston, R. J., Saban, J., Battaglıa, A., & Brubaker, B. (2003). Designing and constructing the holonomous school. In J. Ellison, & C. Hayes (Eds.), Cognitive coaching Weaving Threads of Learning and Change into the Culture of an Organization. Norwood, MA, Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
  5. Damasıo, A. (1994). Descartes error: Emotion, reaso