SavedAdd your journal

Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

A RESEARCH FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PERCEPTION OF ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONALS: THE CASE OF TRABZON

Erol Tekin
Yasar Bayraktar
Pages
19–26
Publication Date
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research results indicate that accounting professionals have high CSR perception as expected.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the perceptions of CSR activities and the factors that have influence on it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, according to test results related to social responsibility dimensions, economic responsibility dimension has no significant differences in terms of any factors and legal responsibility dimension has only a significant difference in terms of abroad experience.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research results indicate that accounting professionals have high CSR perception as expected.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Corporate social responsibility (CSR) · accounting professionals · CSR perception

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the perceptions of CSR activities and the factors that have influence on it. In this regard, a research was carried out in Trabzon to examine the accounting professionals’ CSR perception whether it changes in terms of factors such as gender, age, education skill, CSR training, abroad experience and tenure. Questionnaire technique was used for data collection method in the study. The collected data were analyzed with t-test and ANOVA test by using SPSS. The research results indicate that accounting professionals have high CSR perception as expected. In addition, according to test results related to social responsibility dimensions, economic responsibility dimension has no significant differences in terms of any factors and legal responsibility dimension has only a significant difference in terms of abroad experience. On the other hand, while ethical responsibility dimension has significant difference in terms of CSR training, philanthropic responsibility has significant difference in terms of tenure and age

🔖

Cite This Article

Tekin, E., Bayraktar, Y. (2016). A RESEARCH FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PERCEPTION OF ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONALS: THE CASE OF TRABZON. PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 19–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/842724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aktan, C.C and Börü, D. (2006), “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Kavramı”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.canaktan.org/yonetim/kurumsal- sosyalsorum/kurumsal-sosyal/kurumsalsosyal.htm, Access Date: 01.04.2016.
  2. Bir, Ç. S., Suher, İ. K. and Altınbaşak, İ. (2014), “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Yönelimi ve İşveren Çekiciliği”, Journal of Yaşar University, 4 (15), pp. 2303-2326.
  3. Bowen, H.R. (1953), “Social Responsibility of the Businessman”, Harpers and Brothers: New York. Carroll, A. B. (1979), “A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 497-505.
  4. Daştan, A. and Bellikli, U. (2015), Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Muhasebe Etkileşimi: Türkiye’de Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksi’ne Dâhil İşletmelerde Bir Araştırma, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol.10, pp.177-208.
  5. Davis, K. (1960),” Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities”, California Management Review, vol. 2, pp.70-76.
  6. Davis, K. (1973), “The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 16, pp. 322. Demir, B. (2013), “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Muhasebe”, Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), pp.225-233.
  7. Düren, Z. (2002), “2000’li Yıllarda Yönetim”, Alfa Yayınları:
  8. İstanbul.
  9. Erkman, T. and Şahinoğlu, F. (2012), “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Faaliyetlerine İlişkin Çalışan Algıları ile Örgütsel Bağlılığın Hizmet Sektöründe İncelenmesi”, Marmara Üniversitesi İ.i.B. Dergisi, 33(2), pp.267-294.
  10. Frederick, W.C. (1987), “Theories of Corporate Social Performance”. In Sethi, S.P. & Falbe, C.M. (eds.), Business and Society. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Friedman, M. (1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits”, New York Times Magazine, vol. 13, pp. 32-33.
  11. Kalaycı, Ş. (2014), “SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri”, edt. Ş. Kalaycı, Asil Yayın Dağıtım: Ankara.
  12. Kaya, H. (2008), “Demografik Özelliklerin Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Algılaması Üzerindeki Rolü: Bandırma Yerelinde Bir Araştırma”, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(20), pp.96-110.
  13. Köroğlu, Ç. and Ersöz Ö. H. (2015), “Muhasebe Meslek Mensuplarının Bakış Açılarından Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Muhasebe İlişkisi”, Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, vol. 1, no. 3, 123-153.
  14. Maignan, I. (2001), “Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison”, Journal of Busines