SavedAdd your journal

Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

ERGONOMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF MANUAL MATERIAL HANDLING AT AN AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Baba Md DEROS
Dian Darina İndah DARUİS
Athirah Liyana ROSLY
İlhami Abd AZİZ
Nor Syazwani HİSHAMUDDİN
Nur Hidayah Abd HAMİD
Siti Maisarah ROSLİN
Pages
317–324
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The recommended control measures to be implemented in Company X include to limit the working time, administrative control, training, and reduce the weight of the load carried and lifted by the MMH workers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates ergonomic risks faced by manual material handling (MMH) workers performing repetitive loads carrying, holding, lifting, lowering, pushing and pulling activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 11 MMH workers was recruited to participate in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The recommended control measures to be implemented in Company X include to limit the working time, administrative control, training, and reduce the weight of the load carried and lifted by the MMH workers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ergonomics · manual handling · REBA

Abstract

This study investigates ergonomic risks faced by manual material handling (MMH) workers performing repetitive loads carrying, holding, lifting, lowering, pushing and pulling activities. A total of 11 MMH workers was recruited to participate in the study. Methods used to collect data were Modified Nordic Questionnaire (MNQ), Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and NIOSH Lifting Equation. MNQ result showed the MMH workers’ body parts that suffered pain are shoulders (63.6%), upper back (54.5%) and lower back (45.4%). The movements, which recorded high REBA score (i.e. 9) are twisting, lowering and lifting, which is considered as high risk. Based on NIOSH Lifting Equation, the value of RWL for MMH tasks is 15.82 and the lifting index (LI) is 0.73. The recommended control measures to be implemented in Company X include to limit the working time, administrative control, training, and reduce the weight of the load carried and lifted by the MMH workers.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEROS, B. M., DARUİS, D. D. İ., ROSLY, A. L., AZİZ, İ. A., HİSHAMUDDİN, N. S., HAMİD, N. H. A., ROSLİN, S. M. (2017). ERGONOMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF MANUAL MATERIAL HANDLING AT AN AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 317–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/842634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Choi, S.D., Woletz, T. 2010. “Do stretching programs prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders”. Journal of Safety, Health and Environmental Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1-19.
  2. Deros, B. M., Daruis, D.D.I., Ghani, J. A., Salleh, C., Wazir, R. M., Yasim, M. K., Hassan, N.H., Saidi, M. S. 2016. “A case study on manual handling at an electronic component manufacturing company”. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, vol. 1, (Special Issue 1), pp. 1-6.
  3. Gallis, C. 2006. “Work-Related Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Greek Forest Workers”. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 731–736.
  4. Hignett, S. & McAtamney, L. 2000. “Rapid entire body assessment (REBA)”, Applied ergonomics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 201-205.
  5. Kuorinka, I., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., Vinterberg, H., Biering-Sørensen, F., Andersson, G., Jørgensen, K. 1987. “Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms”, Applied ergonomics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 233-237.
  6. Latko, W.A., Armstrong T.J., Franzblau, A., Ulin, S.S., Werner, R.A., Albers, J.W. 1999. “Cross-Sectional Studies of the relationship between repetitive work and prevalence of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders”, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 36, pp. 248-259.
  7. Lasota, A. M. 2015. “Ergonomic evaluation of physical risk for packing line operators”, Logistics and Transport, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 11-20.
  8. Lin, M.I., Radwin, R.G. 1998. “Agreement between a frequency-weighted filter for continuous biomechanical measurements of repetitive wrist flexion against a load and published pshcophysical data”, Ergonomics, vol. 4, pp. 459-475.
  9. Mittal, A., Sharma, H. K., Mittal, K. 2013. “Ergonomic Risk Controls in Construction Industry - A Literature Review”, International Journal of Emerging Research Management & Technology, vol. 2, pp. 28-33.
  10. Nurmianto, E., Ciptomulyono, U., & Kromodihardjo, S. 2015. “Manual Handling Problem Identification in Mining Industry: An ergonomic perspective”, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 4, pp. 89-97.
  11. Parejo-Moscoso, J. M., Rubio-Romero, J. C., Pérez-Canto, S. 2012. “Occupational Accident Rate in Olive Oil Mills”, Safety Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 285–293.
  12. Qutubuddin, S. M., Hebbal, S. S., Kumar, A. C. S. 2013. “An ergonomic study of work related musculoskeletal disorder risks in Indian Saw Mills”, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 7-13.
  13. Revel, M., Andre-deshays, C., Roudier, R., Roudier, B., Hamard, G., Amor, B. 1