Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM

Pages
130–138
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion, the most suitable and the less suitable provinces for fattening livestock farm are selected

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey has a high potential in the field of agriculture and livestock production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although nowadays pastures are decreased, Turkey has quite large pastures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion, the most suitable and the less suitable provinces for fattening livestock farm are selected
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Multiple criteria decision making methods · analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method · PROMETHEE

Abstract

Turkey has a high potential in the field of agriculture and livestock production. Turkey has a long history in the production of livestock system, which became the “buffer” sector of economy and the “locomotive” sector of Turkey. Although nowadays pastures are decreased, Turkey has quite large pastures. Besides, the domestic demand for meat in Turkey is quite large and tend to a show considerable growth. Animal husbandry is carrying great importance in terms of protein source and fattening cattle in the red meat production. In this sense, the development of meat production in terms of quality and quantity is also very necessary in terms of the nutritional problem that arises parallel to the growing population. In this study, the causes of increase in meat prices in Turkey were investigated, and the findings showed that, the cause of the price increases made as inadequate animal fattening. As a result, it was decided to establish a new place for the production of cattle-raising. Before starting the construction of the fattening livestock farm, firstly the location of the establishment is considered. In the decision-making process, it is quite difficult to make choices because of the different alternatives in terms of various criteria's. For this purpose, the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) method, which is an easy and straightforward method of multi-criteria decision making techniques which are frequently used in researches in recent years, has been used to select the place of establishment in Turkey. The choice of fattening farm establishment site was evaluated in 81 provinces; cattle feed areas, demand on meat, urban development index value, average minimum temperature, average maximum temperature, precipitation amount and grant support criteria were evaluated with using the PROMETHEE method. The interactions between the criterion and the criteria that influence the process were determined as a result of the survey conducted. As a result of this survey study, criteria weights and criterion values were determined by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and solved by PROMETHEE method considering the results. As a conclusion, the most suitable and the less suitable provinces for fattening livestock farm are selected

🔖

Cite This Article

OZCAN, B., AKMAN, G., KARABİCAK, C., ERDOGAN, Y. (2017). USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM. PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 130–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/842582

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Athawale, V.M. ve Chakraborty, S. 2010. “Facility Location Selection Using PROMETHEE II Method”, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dhaka, Bangladesh,pp: 59-63.
  2. Bakan, H., 2013, “Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemiyle Üniversite Kurulması Uygun Olan İlçelerin Belirlenmesi” Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), s:43-63.
  3. Çiftçioğlu, B., 2013, “İnşaat Sektöründe AHP Yöntemi İle Alt Yüklenici Seçimi: Bir Konut Projesinde Uygulama”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi,
  4. İstanbul.
  5. Çukur, F., Saner G., 2005, “Konvansiyonel ve Ekolojik Hayvancılık Sistemlerinin Sürdürülebilirliği ve Türkiye Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), s:39-44.
  6. Dağdeviren, M. ve Eraslan, E. 2008, “PROMETHEE Sıralama Yöntemiyle Tedarikçi Seçimi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1): 69-75.
  7. Ekmekyapar, T., 1991, Hayvan Barınaklarında Çevre Koşullarının Düzenlenmesi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları,
  8. Erzurum. Genç, T., Masca, M. 2013, “Topsis ve Promethee Yöntemleri ile Elde Edilen Üstünlük Sıralamalarının Bir Uygulama Üzerinden Karşılaştırılması”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15(2): 539-566.
  9. Hacıbebekoğlu, A., Hacıbebekoğlu M., Çetinel, S., Ülver, M. 2013, Büyükbaş Hayvan Besiciliği Yatırım Fizibilitesi, Karacadağ Kalkınma Ajansı Destek Programı. http://arastirma.tarim.gov.tr/gaputaem/Belgeler/tar%C4%B1msal%20veriler/gaputaem%20gncel/HAYVANCILIK%20RAPORU%202015.pdf http://www.tepge.gov.tr/dosyalar/yayinlar/7b4e10c046074a319ca607fb3c7aae15.pdf http://www.tkdk.gov.tr/ProjeIslemleri/DesteklenenIller http://www.tuik.gov.tr/HbGetir.do?id=21871&tb_id=3 https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx Kokangül,A., Susuz, Z., 2009, “Integrated analytical hierarchy process and mathematical programming to supplier selection problem with quantity discount”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, cilt: 33(3), pp. 1417-1429.
  10. Kutay, N., Tektüfekçi, F., 2012, “Yönetsel Muhasebe Kararlarının Verilmesinde Bir Araç Olarak Promethee Sıralama Yöntemi ve Bir Uygulama”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 3: 83-96.
  11. Maragoudakı, R. ve Tsakiris, G., 2005, “Flood Mitigation Planning Using PROMETHEE”, European Water, 9(10): 51-58.
  12. Ocaklı, B., Ertosun, Z., Demiröz, M., Horasan B., Peker, Ş., 2017, “Türkiye’de Hayvancılığın Durumu ve Et İthalatı”, http://www.zmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/cb16f6f3938e162_ek.pdf, accessing date: 15th April 20