SavedAdd your journal

Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

FROM IDEATION TOWARDS INNOVATION: PILLARS OF FRONT-END IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Onur Emre Kurt
Caglar Ucler
Ozalp VAYVAY
Pages
71–79
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently a model describing the pillars of the fuzzy Front End with respect to object innovation is synthesized here based on evidence from the industry supported by a systematic literature review, which shall support practitioners and researchers in the successful evaluation of innovation ideas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Companies need to deliver innovative new products in order to compete in the global market successfully.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Customer preferences as well technologies are highly dynamic that continuous ideation is required in the fuzzy Front End of product development, where suitable ideas have to be selected to initiate object innovation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently a model describing the pillars of the fuzzy Front End with respect to object innovation is synthesized here based on evidence from the industry supported by a systematic literature review, which shall support practitioners and researchers in the successful evaluation of innovation ideas.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Innovation · new product development · front end

Abstract

Companies need to deliver innovative new products in order to compete in the global market successfully. Customer preferences as well technologies are highly dynamic that continuous ideation is required in the fuzzy Front End of product development, where suitable ideas have to be selected to initiate object innovation. The fuzzy Front End is mainly unorganized in companies, and there is a lack of a consistent taxonomy in the literature covering all aspects in the fuzzy Front End for successful product innovation. Consequently a model describing the pillars of the fuzzy Front End with respect to object innovation is synthesized here based on evidence from the industry supported by a systematic literature review, which shall support practitioners and researchers in the successful evaluation of innovation ideas.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kurt, O. E., Ucler, C., VAYVAY, O. (2017). FROM IDEATION TOWARDS INNOVATION: PILLARS OF FRONT-END IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 71–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/842568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Achiche S., Appio F.P., McAloone T.C., and Minin A.D. (2013), “Fuzzy decision support for tools selection in the core front end activities of new product development”, Research in Engineering Design, vol.24, iss.1, pp.1-18. Ahmed-Kristensen S. and Daalhuizen J. (2015), “Pioneering the combined use of agile and stage-gate models in new product development: cases from the manufacturing industry”, in proceedings of the 22nd Innovation & Product Development Management Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark. Amit R., Zott C., (2012) “Creating Value Through Business Model Innovation”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2012, vol.53, no.3 Andrew J.P., Manget J., Michael D.C., Taylor A., and Zblit H. (2010), “A return to prominence – and the Emergence of a New World Order”, April 2010,
  2. The Boston Consulting Group. Bear, D.J. (2006), “The Quest for Innovation: A Global Study of Innovation Management, 2006-2016”, American Management Association, [online] http://www.amanet.org/images/hri_innovation.pdf Bhidé, A. (2009), “Where innovation creates value”, McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. February 2009, [online] http://www.mckinsey.com/businessfunctions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/where-innovation-creates-value
  3. Brem A. and Voigt K.I. (2009), “Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management: Insights from the German software industry”, Technovation, vol.29, iss.5, pp. 351–367.
  4. Calantone, R. J., Randhawa, P. and Voorhees, C. M. (2014), “Breakeven Time on New Product Launches: An Investigation of the Drivers and Impact on Firm Performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.31, pp.94–104.
  5. Cao, Q., Thompson M.A. and Triche, J. (2013), “Investigating the role of business processes and knowledge management systems on performance: A multi-case study approach”, International Journal of Production Research, vol.51, iss.18, pp. 5565–5575.
  6. Casanueva, C., Castro, I. and Galán, J.L. (2013), “Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, Iss. 5, pp. 603–613.
  7. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2006), “In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition”, Management Science, vol.52, iss 1, pp.68-82. CEN/TS (2013), CEN/TC 389 Innovation Management, Part 1: Innovation Management System. Technical Specification (TS) of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Nr. CEN/TS 16555-1:2013.
  8. Chamakiotis, P., Boukis