Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS OF THE ETNOCENTRIC TENDENCY LEVELS OF TURKISH CONSUMERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CULTURAL EFFECTS OF GLOBALIZATION

Pages
590–598
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analyzes made, it was found that the ethnocentric tendency levels of the Turkish consumers were moderate, that it did not change according to age or gender and that those with higher education levels showed a lower ethnocentric tendency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Given the fact that globalization is an influencing factor shaping all structures of society, it is the testing of three theses with consumer ethnocentrism that is defined in terms of its cultural effects and, additionally, the examination of consumer ethnocentrism in terms of demographic factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a descriptive research, it was carried out through a face-to-face survey method and easy sampling and conducted on 230 respondents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analyzes made, it was found that the ethnocentric tendency levels of the Turkish consumers were moderate, that it did not change according to age or gender and that those with higher education levels showed a lower ethnocentric tendency.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Globalization · culture · ethnocentrism

Abstract

Given the fact that globalization is an influencing factor shaping all structures of society, it is the testing of three theses with consumer ethnocentrism that is defined in terms of its cultural effects and, additionally, the examination of consumer ethnocentrism in terms of demographic factors. As a descriptive research, it was carried out through a face-to-face survey method and easy sampling and conducted on 230 respondents. A 17-unit CETSCALE scale was used to measure the ethnocentric levels of consumers, and the measurement was found to be reliable. As a result of the analyzes made, it was found that the ethnocentric tendency levels of the Turkish consumers were moderate, that it did not change according to age or gender and that those with higher education levels showed a lower ethnocentric tendency. The research concluded that the 'hybridization' thesis was acceptable from possible theses regarding the cultural effects of globalization.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORS, H., CATLİ, O., SERTOGLU, A. E. (2017). THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS OF THE ETNOCENTRIC TENDENCY LEVELS OF TURKISH CONSUMERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CULTURAL EFFECTS OF GLOBALIZATION. PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 590–598. https://ajindex.com/articles/842447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akın, M., Çiçek, R., Gürbüz, E., İnal, E.M. (2009). Tüketici etnosentrizmi ve davranış niyetleri arasındaki farklılığın belirlenmesinde Cetscale ölçeği. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 9 (2), pp 489–512.
  2. Altıntaş, M. H. ve Tokol, T. (2007). Cultural openness and consumer ethnocentrism: An empiricalanalysis of Turkish consumers. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 25(4), pp.308-325.
  3. Arı, E.S., Madran, C. (2011). Satın alma kararlarında tüketici etnosentrizmi ve menşe ülke etkisinin rolü. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Öneri Dergisi, 9(35), pp.15-33.
  4. Armağan, E. A., Gürsoy, Ö. (2011). Satın alma kararlarında tüketici etnosentrizmi ve menşe ülke etkisinin cetscale ölçeği ile değerlendirilmesi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, pp. 67-77
  5. Asil, H., Kaya, I. (2013). Türk tüketicilerin etnosentrik eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), pp. 113-132.
  6. Balabanis, G., Diamantopoulıs, A. (2004). Domestic country bias, contry-of-origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: A multidimensional unfolding approach, Academy of Marketing ScienceJournal, 32(1), pp. 80-95.
  7. Bearden, W.O., Hardesty, D.M., Rose, R.L. (2001). Consumer self‐confidence: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 28(1) (June), pp.121-134. Cateora, p. (2000).
  8. International marketing, Irwin iç. Saffu, K. Ve Walker, J.H. (2005). An assessment of the consumer ethnocentric scale (CETSCALE) in an advanced and transitional country: The case of Canada and Russia, International Journal of Management, 22(4), 556-571.
  9. Çilingir, Z. (2014). Tüketici etnik kökenciliği ğğilimi ölçeği (Cetscale): İstanbul ili tüketicileri üzerine bir pilot qraştırma. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 13(13), pp. 209-232.
  10. Giddens, A. (1998).
  11. Modernliğin sonuçları, Ayrıntı Yayınları,
  12. İstanbul.
  13. Hannerz, U. (1998). Çevre kültür senaryoları. Küreselleşme ve Dünya Sistemi, Çev. G. Seçkin ve H.Yolsal, Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları,
  14. Ankara.
  15. Harvey, U. (1992), The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell, Oxford. İç. Holton, R. (2013),
  16. Küreselleşmenin Kültürel Sonuçları, Sosyoloji Konferansları, 47(1): 59-75.
  17. Holton, R. (2013), Küreselleşmenin kültürel sonuçları. Sosyoloji Konferansları, 47(1), pp. 59-75.
  18. İşler, D. B. (2012). Tüketici entrosentrizmi ve menşe ülke etkisi ekseninde satın alma kararlarındaki rolü: CETSCALE ölçeği ile bir uygulama. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler En