Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 163 - Sayı: 163

The electric power production targeted Unconventional Geothermal Systems (UGS), some conceptual designs and their thermodynamics classification

Pages
211–228
Publication Date
2020-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, some new suggestions that can be used to define the definitional boundaries of these terms are put forward.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The geothermal energy is a renewable and relatively clean energy resource.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first concrete steps towards the utilization of such high potential areas emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, some new suggestions that can be used to define the definitional boundaries of these terms are put forward.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geothermal Energy · EGS · UGS

Abstract

The geothermal energy is a renewable and relatively clean energy resource. The amount of geothermal energy stored just in the upper crust of the earth is large enough to meet the world’s energy needs for thousands of years. Unfortunately, only a small portion of this potential can be utilized today by the conventional methods. The rest corresponds to the hot, fluid-poor areas which cannot be utilized by the current technology. The first concrete steps towards the utilization of such high potential areas emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s. These studies have gradually continued in the following years, and many new terms and conceptual designs have been proposed so far. Unfortunately, no comprehensive definition has been established on this subject yet. This may bring about some difficulties such as the failure to express the intended concept in the right manner, the inability to determine the legal boundaries for the regulations required by the countries to make use of these areas which pose high risks in the commercial point of view. In this paper, some of the major terms and conceptual designs used for the projects targeting the power generation from fluid- poor hot areas are discussed. Furthermore, all of these terms have been gathered under the title of “Unconventional Geothermal Systems-UGS” and these designs are classified according to the types of thermodynamic system for the first time in this study. In addition, some new suggestions that can be used to define the definitional boundaries of these terms are put forward.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEK, A. (2020). The electric power production targeted Unconventional Geothermal Systems (UGS), some conceptual designs and their thermodynamics classification. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 163 - Sayı: 163, 211–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/84243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ABD Patent ve Marka Ofisi, Patent No: 5,515,679, May 14, 1996.
  2. ABD Patent ve Marka Ofisi, Patent No: 6,247,313B1, June 19, 2001.
  3. Armstead, H. C. H., Tester, J. W. 1987.
  4. Heat Mining. E. and F. N. Spon, London and New York, 478 p. Breede, K., Dzebisashvili, K., Liu, X., Falcone, G. 2013. A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future. Geothermal Energy, 1, 4. Breede, K., Dzebisashvili, K., Falcone, G. 2015. Overcoming challenges in the classification of deep geothermal potential. Geothermal Energy Sciences, 3, 19-39.
  5. Brown, D.W., Duchane, D.V., Heiken, G. Hriscu, V.T. 2012. Mining the Earth’s Heat: Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy. Springer-Verlag, 657 p. Çiçek, A. 2019. Enerji hedefli geleneksel olmayan jeotermal sistemlerin (UGS) uygulandığı sahalarda yaşanan önemli teknik sorunlar. MTA Doğal Kaynaklar ve Ekonomi Bülteni, 28, 73-77.
  6. Canoğlu, M.C., Kurtuluş, B. 2016. Body type optimization of water structures and engineering parameters determination of natural structural materials: an example from Kışlademirli Dam (Kütahya). Karaelmas Science and Engineering Journal, 6, 2, 250-264.
  7. Canoğlu, M. C., Kurtulus, B. 2017. Permeability of Savcıbey dam (Bilecik) axis location and design of grout curtain. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration, 154, 157-168.
  8. Canoğlu, M. C. 2019. Selection of Suitable Dam Axis Location Considering Permeability and Grout Curtain Optimization Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 25, 1, 15-25. Eavor Technologies Inc. https://eavor.com/press/.September 12, 2020.
  9. Espinoza, G. https://dnicolasespinoza.github.io/, September 12, 2020.
  10. Finsterle, S., Zhang, Y., Pan, L., Dobson, P. Oglesby, K. 2013. Microhole arrays for improved heat mining from enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics, 47, 104-115.
  11. Genter, A., Guillou-Frottier, L., Feybesse, J.-L., Nicol, N., Dezayes, C., Schwartz, S. 2003. Typology of potential hot fractured rock resources in Europe, Geothermics, 32, 701-710.
  12. Genter, A., Evans, K., Cuenot, N., Fritsch, D., Sanjuan, B. 2010. Contribution of Exploration of Deep Crystalline Fractured Reservoir of Soultz to the Knowledge of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 342, 502- 516. GeoSierra LLC. http://www.geosierra.com/geothermal. html. September 12, 2020. Geothermal Explorers Ltd., 2003. Schematic representation of the Classical UGS design Grassiani, M., Krieger, Z., Legmann, H. 1999. Advanced power plants for use with HDR/ enhanced geothermal techno