Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

MOBBING IN TURKISH LABOR LAW

Pages
409–422
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Changes that the worker does not accept in writing do not affect the worker.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although the Labor Code is not a direct regulation of mobbing, the worker protective structure of the Labor Code creates a protective structure if it is inadequate against some behaviors that can be described as mobbing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with Article 24/2 / b of the Labor Code, if the words to be said for the honor and honor of the worker are spoken or if they are committed, the worker's employment contract may be terminated for good cause before the end of the employee or without waiting for the notification period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Changes that the worker does not accept in writing do not affect the worker.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mobbing · physchological violence · bullying at work

Abstract

Although the Labor Code is not a direct regulation of mobbing, the worker protective structure of the Labor Code creates a protective structure if it is inadequate against some behaviors that can be described as mobbing. A worker who is incompatible with the cost of equal treatment may claim another compensation for a compensation fee of up to four months. In accordance with Article 24/2 / b of the Labor Code, if the words to be said for the honor and honor of the worker are spoken or if they are committed, the worker's employment contract may be terminated for good cause before the end of the employee or without waiting for the notification period. The employer can also make mobbing by making constant changes in working conditions. According to the Labor Code m.22; If the employer makes a significant change in the working conditions, he must report the situation in writing to the worker. Changes that the worker does not accept in writing do not affect the worker.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tunc, Y. E. (2017). MOBBING IN TURKISH LABOR LAW. PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 409–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/842411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, Andrea, Bullying at Work, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1997, 7 Akgeyik, Tekin; Güngör, Meltem; Uşen, Şelale ve Omay, Umut, “İşyerinde Psikolojik Taciz Olgusu: Niteliği, Yaygınlığı ve Mücadele Stratejisi”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, 2009, 56 Akıncı, Şahin, Borçlar Hukuku Bilgisi, Sayram Yayınları, Konya, 2006
  2. Arslan Ertürk, Arzu, “İş Hukuku Boyutuyla Türkiye’de Psikolojik Taciz (Mobbing) ve Dünya’dan Örnekler”, Prof. Dr. Ali Rıza Okur’a Armağan, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, İstanbul, 2014, 20(1) Aydın, Şule; Özkul, Emrah, “İşyerinde Yaşanan Psikolojik Şiddetin Yapısı ve Boyutları: 4-5 Yıldızlı Otel İşletmeleri Örneği”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2) Baysal, Mustafa, Çözümlerle İş Kanunu Sorunları, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2014
  3. Bilge, Selahattin Samet, “Mobbing Terimi ve Türk Hukuk Düzeninde İncelenmesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2016, 65(4), 1245-1290
  4. Bilgili, Abbas, İş Hukuku Açısından Mobbing, Karahan Kitapevi, Adana, 2012
  5. Binbir, Sinan, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kanunuyla Birlikte Yargı Kararları, Açıklama ve Örneklerle İş Kanunu, Yaklaşım Yayınları, İstanbul, 2012
  6. Centel, Tankut, “Türk Borçlar Kanunu’nda Genel Olarak İşçinin Kişiliğinin Korunması”, Sicil İHD, 2011,
  7. Aralık Chappell, Duncan ve Di Martino, Vittorio, Violence at Work, International Labour Office, Genava, 2006
  8. Çelik, Nuri, İş Hukuku Dersleri, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2016
  9. Çokgüler, Aslı, “Onurlu Çalışma Hakkı”, Psikeart, 2014, 36 Davenport, Noa; Schwartz, Ruth Distler, Elliot, Gail Pursell, Mobbing İşyerinde Duygusal Taciz, Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2003
  10. Demir, Şamil, “Mobbing Olgusunun Hukuki Değerlendirmesi”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 2009, 67/2, ss. 139-145
  11. Doğancı, Doğa Ekrem; Çakrak, Recep, “ Hukuki Düzenlemeler Çerçevesinde Psikoloji Taciz (Mobbing) ve İspat Yükü, Kara Tahta, 2016, 6, 77106 Erdem, Mustafa Ruhan; Parlak, Benay, “ Ceza Hukuku Boyutuyla Mobbing”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 2010, 88, 261-286 European Parliament, “Resolution on Harassment at the Workplace 2001/2339 (INI)”, Official Journal of European Communities, 2001
  12. Güngör, Meltem, Çalışma Hayatında Psikolojik Taciz, Derin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2008 http://www.milliyet.com.tr/dekana-mobbing-cezasi-gundem-1270035/, Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2017
  13. İlhan, Ümit, “ İşyerinde Psikolojik Tacizin (Mobbing) Tarihsel Arka Planı ve Türk Hukuk Sistemindeki Yeri”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 2010, 10(4), 1175-1186 İşyerinde Psikolojik Şidd