Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 163 - Sayı: 163

Using of GIS on field geology studies: An application on central-southern of Eskişehir

Pages
27–38
Publication Date
2020-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The other surface evidances include dilation fractures, strike-slip faults are support the idea which is suggested for Eskişehir region as right lateral strike-slip shear zone.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Technological developments on Geographical Information Systems (GIS) make possible to use its applications on all departments of earth sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:GIS based drill-hole data, lithological and structural maps are used integrated with field geolgy investigations in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The other surface evidances include dilation fractures, strike-slip faults are support the idea which is suggested for Eskişehir region as right lateral strike-slip shear zone.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eskişehir basin · Geographial information systems · Field geolgy

Abstract

Technological developments on Geographical Information Systems (GIS) make possible to use its applications on all departments of earth sciences. GIS based drill-hole data, lithological and structural maps are used integrated with field geolgy investigations in this study. The area where is bordered Batıkent-Yukarı Söğütönü districts on northwest and Vadişehir-Ihlamurkent districts on southeast is defined as study area. 44 water wells drilled by State Hydraulic Works (DSİ) are located in various points of Eskişehir region were transformed to GIS base. Geological cross-sections which were designed by drill-hole lithology are point out a disconformity zones between Paleogene and Neogene according to principle of lateral continuity. Neotechtonic researches on study area Show thah right lateral strike slip shear zone dominates the region structurally. Searching these structural traces on the field and representing new field evidances by using GIS on the regions where there is no consensus stratigraphicly are the main purposes of the study. Geological map of the region where lies between Çankaya and Karapınar districts without consensus stratigrapichly was made by field observations on Miocene units. The other surface evidances include dilation fractures, strike-slip faults are support the idea which is suggested for Eskişehir region as right lateral strike-slip shear zone.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, C., PEKKAN, E., TÜN, M. (2020). Using of GIS on field geology studies: An application on central-southern of Eskişehir. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 163 - Sayı: 163, 27–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/84233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altunel, E., Barka, A. 1998. Eskişehir fay zonimun İnönü- Sultandere arasında neotektonik aktivitesi. Geological Bulletin of Turkey 41(2), 41-52.
  2. Barka, A., Reilinger, R., Şaroğlu, F., Şengör, A.M.C. 1995.The Isparta angle: Its importance in the neotectonics ofthe eastern Mediterranean region. IESCA-1995
  3. Proce-edings Bartlett, W.L., Friedman, M., Logan, J.M. 1981. Experimental folding andfaulting of rocks under confining pressure. Part IX. Wrench faults inlimestone layers. Tectonophysics 79, 255 – 277. Emre, Ö., Duman, T. Y., Özalp, S., Elmacı, H., Olgun, Ş., Şaroğlu, F. 2013. 1/1.250.000 ölçekli Türkiye diri fay haritası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Özel Yayınlar Serisi, Ankara,
  4. Türkiye. Göncüoğlu, M. C., Turhan, N., Şentürk, K., Özcan, A., Uysal, Ş., Yalınız, M. K. 2000. A geotraverse across northwestern Turkey: Tectonic units of the Central Sakarya region and their tectonic evolution. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 173(1), 139-161.
  5. Gözler, M. Z., Cevher, F., Ergül, E., Asutay, H. J. 1996. Orta Sakarya ve güneyinin jeolojisi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 9973. Ankara (unpublished). Hancock, P.L. 1985. Brittle microtectonics: Principles and practice. Journal of Structural Geology 7, 437 – 457. Harding, T. P. 1974. Petroleum traps associated with wrench faults. AAPG Bulletin 58(7), 1290-1304.
  6. Ketin, İ. 1966. Tectonic units of Anatolia (Asia Minor). Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 66, 23-33,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Kumsar, H., Çelik, S. B., Mustafa, K. 2011. Denizli İl Merkezi Yerleşim Alanının Jeolojik, Jeoteknik Kent Bilgi Sistemi (JEO-KBS). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 10(4), 25-31.
  9. Ocakoğlu, F. 2007. A re-evaluation of the Eskişehir Fault Zone as a recent extensional structure in NW Turkey. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 31(2), 91-103.
  10. Okay, A. I. 2011. Tavşanlı Zone: The Northern Subducted Margin of the Anatolidetauride Block. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 142, 195- 226. Okay, A. I., Monod, O., Monié, P. 2002. Triassic blueschists and eclogites from northwest Turkey: vestiges of the Paleo-Tethyan subduction. Lithos 64(3-4), 155-178.
  11. Orhan, A., Seyrek, E., Tosun, H. 2007. A probabilistic approach for earthquake hazard assessment of the Province of Eskişehir, Turkey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 7(5): 607-614.
  12. Seyis, C,. Yalçın, M.N., İnan, S. 2002. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemine (CBS) Dayalı Jeolojik Veri Tabanı Yönetimine Zonguldak Bölgesinden Bir Örnek, Tü