Journals / PHILIA / 2016 / Cilt: Suppl. 1

Yeni Hitit Yazı Araç-Gereçleri

Journal
PHILIA
Pages
863–873
Publication Date
2016-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, the multicultural and multilingual discourse of the Neo-Hittite kingdoms may have reached to the outside of the royal-courts and become appreciable for the provincial elites to a degree, as well.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The writing instruments depicted on Neo-Hittite stone reliefs consist of the waxed tablets, pointed styli and a pen case.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Technomically these confirm that beside the different type of mediae the perishable materials were in widely use for everyday documents during the Neo-Hittite period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, the multicultural and multilingual discourse of the Neo-Hittite kingdoms may have reached to the outside of the royal-courts and become appreciable for the provincial elites to a degree, as well.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeni Hitit · yazı araç-gereçleri · balmumu tabletler

Abstract

The writing instruments depicted on Neo-Hittite stone reliefs consist of the waxed tablets, pointed styli and a pen case. Technomically these confirm that beside the different type of mediae the perishable materials were in widely use for everyday documents during the Neo-Hittite period. Contrary to the general presumption, on the other hand, it is argued here that their socio-technical character do not necessarily need to indicate the profession of the associated figure like “the scribe” or “the augur”, but may refer solely to the literacy possessed by the figure such as non-adults representations on the commemorative stelae. In addition to that the writing implements discussed here are powerful ideotechnical elements conditioned with the renewed historical and socio-cultural context of the Early Iron Age. In this respect, the multicultural and multilingual discourse of the Neo-Hittite kingdoms may have reached to the outside of the royal-courts and become appreciable for the provincial elites to a degree, as well.

Özet

Yeni Hitit taş kabarmaları üzerinde betimlenen yazı araç-gereçleri balmumu yazı tabletleri, sivri uçlu kalemler (styli) ve bir kalem çantasından oluşmaktadır. Sunulan çalışmanın konusunu oluşturan bu yazı araç-gereçleri, arkeolojik buluntular ve yazılı kaynaklardaki eksiklikler nedeniyle, Yeni Hitit dönemi toplumsal yaşamı ve materyal kültür araştırmaları açısından kendilerine özel bir yer tahsis etmektedirler. Makalede, öncül araştırmalardan farklı olarak Yeni Hitit yontuculuk ürünleri içerisinde kendilerine temsil değeri bulan söz konusu yazı araç-gereçleri bir araya getirilmiş ve salt ikonografik açıdan değil fakat yakın ve uzak benzerleri aracığıyla biçim, işlev, içerik ve bağlam yönünden analiz edilmiştir. Metin, malzeme ve buluntu yerlerini tanıtan kısa br girişin ardından yazı tableti, kalem ve kalem kutusundan oluşan Yeni Hitit yazı takımı birbiriyle bağlantılı üç başlık altında ele almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİRYAKİ, S. G. (2016). Yeni Hitit Yazı Araç-Gereçleri. PHILIA, Cilt: Suppl. 1, 863–873. https://ajindex.com/articles/841931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Akurgal 1962
  2. E. Akurgal, The Art of the Hittites, Yhames and Hudson, Londra 1962. Akurgal 1968
  3. E. Akurgal, The Birth of the Greek Art. The Mediterranean and the Near East, Londra 1968. Aro 2003
  4. S. Aro, Art and Arhitecture, şurada: C. Melchert (ed.), The Luwians, Leiden – Boston 2003, 281–337. Bellamy 1989
  5. R. Bellamy, Bellorophon’s Tablet, Classical Journal 84/4, 1989, 289–307. Banti 1960
  6. L. Banti, Die Welt der Etrusker, Darmstadt 1960. Bass et all. 1989 G. Bass – C. Pulak – D. Collon – J. Weinstein, The Bronze Age Shipwreck at Ulu Burun: 1986
  7. Campaign, AJA 93/1, 1989, 1–29. Boehmer 1972
  8. M. R. Boehmer, Die Kleinfunde von Bogazköy aus den Grabungskampagnen 1931–1939 und 1952–1969, Berlin 1972. Bonatz 2000
  9. D. Bonatz, Das syro-hethitische Grabdenkmal. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung einer neuen Bildgattung in der Eisenzeit im nordsyrisch-südostanatolischen Raum, Mainz 2000. Bonatz 2014
  10. D. Bonantz, Art, şurada: H. Niehr (ed.), The Arameans in Ancient Syria, Leiden 2013, 205–242. Breasted 1916
  11. J. H. Breasted, The Physical process of Writing in the Early Orient and Their Relation to the Origin of the Alphabet, AJSL 32/4, 1916, 230–249. Brown 2008
  12. B. A. Brown, Monumentalizing Identities: North Syrian Urbanism, 1200–800 BCE (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, California Üniversitesi 2008). Bryce 1999
  13. T. R. Bryce, Anatolian Scribes in Mycenaen Greece, Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 48/3, 1999, 257-264. Bryce 2012
  14. T. R. Bryce, The World of the Neo-Hittite Kingdoms: A Political and Military History, Oxford – New York 2012. Carr 2008
  15. D. M. Carr, Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature, Oxford 2008. Charpin 2010
  16. D. Charpin, Writing, Law and Kingship in Old Babylonian Mesopotamia, Londra 2010. Darga 1994
  17. M. Darga, Hitit Sanatı, İstanbul 1994. Davidson 1952
  18. G. R. Davidson, Corinth XII, The Minor Objects, Princeton 1952. Furtwänger – Reichhold 1932 A. Furtwängler – K. Reichhold, Griechische Vasenmalerei, Serie III, Münih 1932. Genge 1979
  19. H. Genge, Nordsyrisch-südanatolische Reliefs: eine archäologisch-historische Untersuchung: Datierung und Bestimmung, Munksgaard 1979. Gilibert 2011
  20. A. Gilibert, Syro-Hittite Monumental Art and the Archaeology of Performance. The Stone Reliefs at Carchemish and Zincirli in the Earlier First Millenium BCE, Berlin 2011. Glenville 1932
  21. S. R. K. Glenville, Scribes’ Palette in th British Museum. Part 1, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 18.1/2, 1932, 53–61. Hawkins 1982
  22. J. D. Hawkins, The Neo Hitittes in Syria and Antolia,