SavedAdd your journal

Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

NETWORK ANALYSIS OF INTERBANK CROSS-BORDER FLOWS AT COUNTRY LEVEL (2006 - 2015)

Ercan Eren
Semanur Soyyigit
Pages
171–187
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a consequence of the analysis, it will be possible to see the effects of global and Eurozone crises on systemic importance and vulnerabilities of countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today’s globalized world, economic activities are performed beyond the physical boundaries of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, we expect to investigate the systemic importance and vulnerabilities of countries in international banking sector by applying HITs algorithm from 2006 to 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a consequence of the analysis, it will be possible to see the effects of global and Eurozone crises on systemic importance and vulnerabilities of countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Financial crises · international financial network · network analysis

Abstract

In today’s globalized world, economic activities are performed beyond the physical boundaries of countries. It can be seen as increasing activities such as trade of goods, financial flows and trade of intermediate goods. Network analysis, that has been used to analyze formations of complex systems recently, is frequently used to investigate these global economic relations. In this context, international trade networks, financial networks and global production networks (input-output networks) are some of the fields that are analyzed in an interdisciplinary way. In this study, it is aimed to analyze interbank cross-border flows at country-level by applying network analysis. Thus, we expect to investigate the systemic importance and vulnerabilities of countries in international banking sector by applying HITs algorithm from 2006 to 2015. HITs algorithm has an advantage since it takes second order adjacencies of countries into consideration. As a consequence of the analysis, it will be possible to see the effects of global and Eurozone crises on systemic importance and vulnerabilities of countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

Eren, E., Soyyigit, S. (2017). NETWORK ANALYSIS OF INTERBANK CROSS-BORDER FLOWS AT COUNTRY LEVEL (2006 - 2015). PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 171–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/837671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acemoğlu, D., Ozdaglar, A., Salehi, A. 2015, “Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks”, American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 564-608.
  2. Allen, F., Gale, D. 2000, “Financial Contagion”, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1-33.
  3. Alves, I. et al. 2013, “The Structure and Resilience of the European Interbank Market”, ESRB Occasional Paper Series, No:3, pp. 1-43.
  4. Bandt, O., Heam, J.C., Labonne, C., Tavolaro, S. 2013, “Measuring Systemic Risk in a Post-crisis World”, ACP Banque de France, Débats économiques et financiers, no. 6, Barabasi, A., Albert, R. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks”, http://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224wreadings/barabasi99scaling.pdf, (13.03.2016).
  5. Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Vespignani, A. 2004, “Traffic-Driven Model of the World Wide Web Graph”, Algorithms and Models for the Web-Graph, Third International Workshop, ed. Stefano Leonardi (Springer). Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., “Systemic Risk in Financial Networks”, Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 129-154.
  6. Caldarelli, G. “Lectures in complex networks”, http://www.ifr.ac.uk/netsci08/Download/Invited/ws1_Caldarelli.pdf.
  7. Chinazzi, M., Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J., Schiavo, S. 2012, “Post-Mortem Examination of the International Financial Network”, University of Trento Department of Economics, no. 02/2012.
  8. Csardi, G., Package ‘igraph’, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/igraph.pdf.
  9. Decarlo, L. 1997, “On the Meaning and the Use of Kurtosis”, Psychological Methods, vol. 2, no.3, 1997, pp. 292-307.
  10. Estrada, E. 2015, “Introduction to Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics”, Evolutionary Equations with Applications in Natural Sciences, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2126, J. Banasiak, M. Mokhtar-Kharroubi (eds.), Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J., Schiavo, S. 2010, “The Evolution of the World Trade Web: A Weighted-Network Analysis”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. c.20, s. 4, pp. 479-514.
  11. Fuge, M., Tee, K., Agogino, A. “Network Analysis of Collaborative Design Networks: A Case Study of OpenIDEO”, http://www.markfuge.com/papers/fuge_tee_openideo_jcise_final_2013.pdf, 14.03.2016.
  12. Hein, O., Schwind, M., König, W.2006, “Scale-Free Networks – The Impact of Fat Tailed Degree Distribution on Diffusion and Communication Processes”, Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol.48, 267–275.
  13. Howell, A. 2012, “Network statistics and modeling the global trade economy: exponential random graph mo