SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

THE REGULATORY ROLE OF COMPASSION IN THE INFLUENCE OF THE PERSONALITY TRAIT OF RESPONSIBILITY ON TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE

Harun Yildiz
Onur Kavak
Pages
408–422
Publication Date
2017-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is suggested that humanitarian aspects such as compassion and responsibility should be examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- Compassion, which has entered into the field of positive psychology and has increased in importance in the recent times, is separated from many characteristics by feeling, empathy and sympathy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The high level of mental ability positively affects employees' performance outcomes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is suggested that humanitarian aspects such as compassion and responsibility should be examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Compassion · conscientiousness trait · task performance

Abstract

Purpose- Compassion, which has entered into the field of positive psychology and has increased in importance in the recent times, is separated from many characteristics by feeling, empathy and sympathy. Compassion is an emotional response that involves intense interest, sensitivity, active and positive participation, respect for one's desire to help. The high level of mental ability positively affects employees' performance outcomes. Therefore, merciful employees create more productive and trustworthy workplaces. In this context, the research is to examine the relationship between intentional compassion, responsibility personality and employee performance. Methodology- Research data were obtained from employees working in various sectors. The obtained data were analysed through IBM SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 22.0 packet programs. Findings- As a result of the research, significant relationships were found between employees' values of compassion, responsibility and performance. Employees with higher levels of compassion and responsibility were found to have a higher contextual and task performance than employees with lower levels of compassion and responsibility. Conclusion- Only employees' good qualifications should not be set as criteria in purchases to workplaces. It is suggested that humanitarian aspects such as compassion and responsibility should be examined.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yildiz, H., Kavak, O. (2017). THE REGULATORY ROLE OF COMPASSION IN THE INFLUENCE OF THE PERSONALITY TRAIT OF RESPONSIBILITY ON TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 408–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/836139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akdeniz, S., & Deniz, M. E. (2016). Merhamet Ölçeği ’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 4(1), 50-61.
  2. Anderson, J.C., ve Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  3. Ansbacher, H.L. (1978). The development of Adler's concept of social interest: A critical study. Journal of Individual Psychology, 34, 118152. Bandura, A. (1997) Self-Efficacy: Toward a UnifiyingTheory of BehavioralChange, PsycholagicalReview. 84. Bandura, A. (2001) Social Cognitive Theory: An AgenticPerspective, İn J.Bryant, D,Zillman.(Eds) Media Effect: Advances İn Theory and Research,, Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Errlbaum, 2nd Ed., p. 121-53.
  4. Beffort, N. and Hattrup, K. (2003). Valuing task and contextual performance: Experience, job roles, and ratings of the importance of job behaviors. Applied HRM Research, 8(1), 17-32.
  5. Boellinghaus, I., Jones, F. W., ve Hutton, J. (2013). Cultivating self-care and compassion in psychological therapists in training: The experience of practicing loving-kindness meditation. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7, 267. Borman, W. C., ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, and Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98).
  6. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Borman, W. C., ve S. J. Motowidlo; (1997), “Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research”. Human Performance, 10, pp. 99–109.
  7. Boxall, P. (1996); “The Staretgic HRM Debate andthe Resource-basedView of theFirm,” Human Resource Management Journal, 6 (3): 59-75.
  8. Briggs, S. R., ve Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106-148.
  9. Cassell, E. J. (2002). Compassion. In C. R. Snyder and Shane J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 434 - 445). New York: Oxford University. Chou, K. L. (1996).
  10. The Rushton, Chris John and Fekken self-report altruism scale: a Chinese translation. Personality and individual differences, 21, 297-298.
  11. Church, M. K., (1993), “Investigation and Measurement of Personality Structure in a Non-Western Culture: Relating Indigenous Philippine Dimensions to the Big Five Model”, Doctoral Dissertation, Washington State University, Washington. Conway, J. M.; (1999). “Disting