SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

DETERMINING OF DISASTER LOGISTICS RISKS BASED ON LITERATURE REVIEW

AFET LOJİSTİĞİ RİSKLERİNİN LİTERATÜR ARAŞTIRMASINA DAYALI OLARAK BELİRLENMESİ

Aylin OFLUOGLU
Birdogan BAKİ
İlker Murat AR
Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2019-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The literature review was made on the databases EmeraldInsight, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor&Francis Online and SpringerLink by using the keywords “disaster logistics risk”, “humanitarian logistics risk” and “emergency logistics risk”.Findings - The survey results show that demand risk is the most considered disaster logistics risk.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose - Identifying and analysing of disaster logistics risks is a guide to the organizations according to the disaster logistics plans and actions to be taken.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main pupose of this study is to reveal the disaster logistics risks and the used methods to mitigate the effects of the risks.Methodology - The researches on disaster logistics risks were reviewed between January 2011-December 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The literature review was made on the databases EmeraldInsight, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor&Francis Online and SpringerLink by using the keywords “disaster logistics risk”, “humanitarian logistics risk” and “emergency logistics risk”.Findings - The survey results show that demand risk is the most considered disaster logistics risk.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Afet lojistiği · afet lojistiği riskleri · literatür araştırması

Abstract

Purpose - Identifying and analysing of disaster logistics risks is a guide to the organizations according to the disaster logistics plans and actions to be taken. The main pupose of this study is to reveal the disaster logistics risks and the used methods to mitigate the effects of the risks.Methodology - The researches on disaster logistics risks were reviewed between January 2011-December 2018. The literature review was made on the databases EmeraldInsight, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor&Francis Online and SpringerLink by using the keywords “disaster logistics risk”, “humanitarian logistics risk” and “emergency logistics risk”.Findings - The survey results show that demand risk is the most considered disaster logistics risk. According to the results, facility location decisions is the most addressed disaster logistics issue and Stochastic Programming is the most used solution method under risk based uncertainty.Conclusion - Considering the risks is very important for the plans and actions to be taken in context of disaster logistics. For future studies, the scope of the study can be extended by adding more databases. Studies can be made to develop strategic decisions to mitigate the effects of the disaster logistics risks.

Özet

Amaç - Afet lojistiği risklerinin belirlenmesi ve analiz edilmesi, kurumlara afet lojistiği kapsamında oluşturacakları planlar ve alacakları önlemler açısından yol gösterici olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, afet lojistiği kapsamındaki risk unsurlarının ve bu risklerin azaltılmasına yönelik farklı yöntemlerin literatür araştırması ile ortaya konmasıdır.Yöntem - Ocak 2011 - Aralık 2018 arasında afet lojistiği riskleri üzerine yapılmış çalışmalar incelenmiştir. Literatür araştırması; EmeraldInsight, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor&Francis Online ve SpringerLink veri tabanları üzerinden “disaster logistics risk”, “humanitarian logistics risk” ve “emergency logistics risk” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştirBulgular - Araştırma sonucunda literatürde en fazla dikkate alınan afet lojistiği riskinin “talep riski” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlara gore afet lojistiği kapsamında en fazla ele alınan konunun tesis kuruluş yeri seçim kararı ve belirsizlik altında en fazla kullanılan çözüm yönteminin de Stokastik Programlama olduğu ortaya konmuştur.Sonuç- Afet lojistiğ kapsamında oluşturulacak planlar ve alınacak önlemler açısından risklerin düşünülmesi oldukça önemlidir. Gelecek çalışmalarda daha fazla veri tabanı eklenerek çalışmanın kapsamı genişletilebilir. Afet lojistiği risklerini azaltacak stratejilerin geliştirilmesine dair araştırmalar gerçekleştirilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OFLUOGLU, A., BAKİ, B., AR, İ. M. (2019). DETERMINING OF DISASTER LOGISTICS RISKS BASED ON LITERATURE REVIEW. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/836132

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AFAD (2014). Açıklamalı afet yönetimi terimleri sözlüğü. https://www.afad.gov.tr/upload/Node/3495/xfiles/sozluk.pdf, (27.11.2017).
  2. Afshar, A., Haghani, A. (2012). Modeling integrated supply chain logistics in real-time large-scale disaster relief operations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46, pp.327-338.
  3. Ahmadi, M., Seifi, A., Tootooni, B. (2015). A humanitarian logistics model for disaster relief operation considering network failure and standard relief time: A case study on San Francisco district. Transportation Research Part E, 75, pp.145–163.
  4. Akgün, A., Gümüşbuğa, F., Tansel, B. (2015). Risk based facility location by using fault tree analysis in disaster management. Omega, 52, pp.168–179.
  5. Alem, D., Clark, A., Moreno, A. (2016). Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief. European Journal of Operational Research, 255, pp.187–206.
  6. Babaei, A., Shahanaghi, K. (2018). A novel algorithm for identifying and analyzing humanitarian relief logistics problems: Studying uncertainty on the basis of interaction with the decision maker. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2, pp.27–45.
  7. Baharmand, H., Comes, T., Lauras, M. (2017). Managing in-country transportation risks in humanitarian supply chains by logistics service providers: Insights from the 2015 Nepal earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, pp.549–559.
  8. Barzinpour, F., Esmaeili, V. (2014). A multi-objective relief chain location distribution model for urban disaster management. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70, pp.1291–1302.
  9. Bastian, N. D., Griffin, P. M., Spero, E., Fulton, L. V. (2016). Multi-criteria logistics modeling for military humanitarian assistance and disaster relief aerial delivery operations. Optimization Letters, 10, pp.921–953.
  10. Ben-Tal, A., Chung, B. D., Mandala, S. R., Yao, T. (2011). Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains. Transportation Research Part B, 45, pp.1177–1189.
  11. Bozorgi-Amiri, B., Jabalameli, M. S., Alinaghian, M., Heydari, M. (2012). A modified particle swarm optimization for disaster relief logistics under uncertain environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60, pp.357–371.
  12. Bozorgi-Amiri, B., Jabalameli, M. S., Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, S. M. J. (2013). A multi-objective robust stochastic programming model for disaster relief logistics under uncertainty. OR Spectrum, 35, pp.905–933. Ca