Journals / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

EFFICIENCY OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PROJECTS PROMOTED IN SOCIAL MEDIA

Pages
90–104
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After the conclusion part, limitations and suggestions are presented to researchers who will conduct research and study on this subject in the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- People's commitment to social media and their tendency to SRP are driving marketers and companies to SRP in social media.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the published survey, 501 people who have completed the survey and are available are reached in total.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After the conclusion part, limitations and suggestions are presented to researchers who will conduct research and study on this subject in the future.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:social responsibility (SR) · social media (SM) · digital marketing

Abstract

Purpose- People's commitment to social media and their tendency to SRP are driving marketers and companies to SRP in social media. It is aimed to investigate which type of SRP is promoted in social media and which social media channels are more likely to share SRP-related posts. In the research, it is examined whether the attention and actions of the society are mobilized according to the age and income status of the society. One wonders whether social media has an impact on getting people to participate in the SRP and whether people's interest in social media has an impact on their participation in the SRP. Methodology- A positivist research approach is adopted as the research design. The quantitative analysis method is used in the research. Data in the research is collected using an online questionnaire. In the published survey, 501 people who have completed the survey and are available are reached in total. Arithmetic mean, correlation, ANOVA and T-test are used to analyze the survey data. Findings- SRPSM attracts the attention of the community and mobilizes the community to participate in these projects. In the fields of health, environment, and education; SRP is more widely promoted on Instagram and Twitter channels. Young people and people with a high-income level do not participate much in the SRP promoted on the social media channel. Social media is an effective tool to get people to participate in the SRP. People's interest in SRP on social media drives them to participate in SRP. Conclusion- While the 1st and 2nd hypotheses are rejected, the 3rd and 4th hypotheses are accepted. It is assumed that the analysis results obtained from the research will contribute to researchers and practitioners. After the conclusion part, limitations and suggestions are presented to researchers who will conduct research and study on this subject in the future.

🔖

Cite This Article

YASATEKIN, H., APAYDIN, F. (2022). EFFICIENCY OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PROJECTS PROMOTED IN SOCIAL MEDIA. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 90–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/836074

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abitbol, A., Lee, S. Y. (2017). Messages on CSR-Dedicated Facebook Pages: What Works and What Doesn’t. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 796-808.
  2. Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., Gabrel, K. P. (2020). Understanding Employee Responses to COVID-19: A Behavioral Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective. Management Research, 18(4), 421-438.
  3. Al-Ghamdi, S. A. A., Badawi, N. S. (2019). Do Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Enhance Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty? Evidence from The Saudi Banking Sector. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1662932. Baird, C. H., Parasnis, G. (2011). From Social Media to Social CRM: Reinventing The Customer Relationship. Strategy & Leadership, 39 (6), 27- 34. Bayrak, H. (2020). 2020
  4. Dünya İnternet, Sosyal Medya ve Mobil Kullanım İstatistikleri. Access Date: 12.11.2020, https://dijilopedi.com/2020- dunya-internet-sosyal-medya-ve-mobilkullanim-istatistikleri Belch, G. E., Belch, M. A. (2004). Advertising and Promotion: An İntegrated Marketing Communicatıons Perspective. (6th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hil Irwin. Benitez, J., Ruiz, L., Castillo, A., Llorens, J. (2020). How Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Influence Employer Reputation: The Role of Social Media Capability. Decision Support Systems, 129, 113223. Bialkova, S., Te Paske, S. (2021).
  5. Campaign Participation, Spreading Electronic Word of Mouth, Purchase: How to Optimise Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, Effectiveness Via Social Media? European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 30(1), 108-126. Bigné, E., Chumpitaz, R., Currás, R. (2010). Alliances Between Brands and Social Causes: The Influence of Company Credibility on Social Responsibility Image. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 169-186.
  6. Blackshaw P., Nazzaro M. (2006). Consumer-Generated Media (CGM) 101: Word-Of-Mouth in The Age of The Web-Fortified Consumer. Second Edition,
  7. Nielsen BuzzMetrics. Bone Louis E., Kurtiz David L. (1999).
  8. Management. Fourth Edition,
  9. McGraw Hill, NewYork. Borges, A. P., Rodrigues, P., Branco, F. C. (2019). Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Purchasing in Economic Crisis. Global Business and Economics Review, 21(5), 583-604.
  10. Burucuoglu, M., Erdogan, E. (2019). The Role of Ethical Positions on Responsible Consumption Behaviours and Consumption Values Regarding The Green Products. Global Business and Economics Review, 21(5), 533-555.
  11. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward The Moral