Journals / Journal of Immunology and Clinical Microbiology / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Microbiological Evaluation of the Clinical Isolated Patients in the General Adult Intensive Care Unit

Pages
133–138
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Investigating the resistance status of microorganisms will be useful in regulating treatment protocols and preventing resistant pathogenic microorganisms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study; microbiological evaluation of clinical isolates of 490 patients treated in general adult intensive care unit between 2016-2018 was aimed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Blood culture samples were evaluated in an automated blood culture system BacT / Alert 3D (bioMerieux, France).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Investigating the resistance status of microorganisms will be useful in regulating treatment protocols and preventing resistant pathogenic microorganisms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Pathogen · Culture · Adult İntensive Care

Abstract

Objective: In this study; microbiological evaluation of clinical isolates of 490 patients treated in general adult intensive care unit between 2016-2018 was aimed. Methods: Blood culture samples were evaluated in an automated blood culture system BacT / Alert 3D (bioMerieux, France). Vitek 2 Compact (BioMe´rieux, Marcyl’Etoile, France) automated bacterial identification system was used for determination of biochemical parameters and antibiograms. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data. Result: In this study; non-fermentative gram negative microorganisms were found to be 10.816% (n = 53). Pseudomonas aeroginosa were detected in 49 patients (10%). Especially in 2018, the total number of microorganisms was found to be higher than the other years, while P. aeroginosa strain (n = 41) increased significantly. The major pathogens were P. aeroginosa, Non-Fermentative Gr (-) bacteria, Klepsiella spp., Escherichia coli, Candida spp., Proteus spp., Pseudomonas spp. was determined. Conclusion: In this study; microorganism distribution of patients hospitalized in intensive care unit was determined. Investigating the resistance status of microorganisms will be useful in regulating treatment protocols and preventing resistant pathogenic microorganisms.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUGEÇTİ, S., KEPEKÇİ, A. B., ZIVALI, M., KOÇER, F. (2020). Microbiological Evaluation of the Clinical Isolated Patients in the General Adult Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Immunology and Clinical Microbiology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 133–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/835939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L. Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2014; 35(6):305-37
  2. D’Agata EM, Thayer V, Schaffner W. An outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii: the importance of cross-transmission. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21(9): 588-91
  3. Barış A, Bulut ME, Öncül A, Bayraktar B. Yoğun Bakım Ünitelerinde Yatan Hastalara Ait Klinik İzolatların Tür Dağılımı ve Antibiyotik Duyarlılıkları. Journal of the Turkish Society of Intensive Care 2017;15(1):21-27
  4. Sugeçti S, Koçer F. Antimicrobial Activity Against Clinical Pathogenic Microorganisms of Commercially Important Natural Extract, Anadolu Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 2015;6 (2): 28-34
  5. Uslu S, Bolat F, Can E, Comert S, Nuhoğlu A. Yenidoğan yoğun bakım ünitelerinde hastane enfeksiyonlarını önleme çalışmaları. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2010; 6(1):1-7
  6. Estripeaut D, Sáez-Llorens X. Perinatal Bacterial Diseases, In: Feigin RD, Cherry JD, Demmler-Harrison GJ, Kaplan SL (Eds): Feigin & Cherry’s Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 6th edition, Saunders-Elsevier, Philadelphia, USA 2009:979-1020
  7. Edwards MS, Baker CJ. Bacterial Infections in the Neonate, In: Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG (Eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 3th ed, Elsevier, China 2008:532-9
  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Testing. Seventeenth Informational Supplement (M100-S16). Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2007
  9. Banerjee SN, Grohskopf LA, Sinkowitz‐Cochran RL, Jarvis WR, Network PP, System NNIS. Incidence of pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit–acquired infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(6):561-70
  10. Sağlam D, Erçal B. D, Yağmur G, Öz HTH, Akın MA, Berk E. Kayseri Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi yenidoğan yoğun bakım ünitelerinde kan kültürlerinden izole edilen mikroorganizmaların dağılımı. Abant Tıp Dergisi, 2015;4(3):255-260
  11. İnan D, Saba R, Keskin S, et al. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hastanesi yoğun bakım ünitelerinde hastane infeksiyonları. Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, 2002;2(2): 129-135
  12. Çetin ES, Kaya S, Pakbaş İ, Demirci M. Yoğun bakım ünitelerinde yatan hastalardan izole edilen mikroorganizmalar ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2007;14(2):69-73
  13. Şahin AR, Yıldız BT, Aktemur A, Topal B, Nazik S, Ateş S. Bir Üniversite Hastanesi Noroloji Yoğun