Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS IN TURKEY: STRUCTURE, ANALYSIS, AND STRATEGY

Pages
191–199
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion- It will be important the REITs, in the sub-group especially in terms of the score distribution, to diversify their portfolio by extending their asset investments, to stabilize dividend payments and to take steps on institutionalization so that they are equivalent to REITs in the supergroup.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- Aim of this study is to make the determinations related to the problems mentioned in the REIT sector in Turkey, to offer a solution for this issue, and to ensure the classification in the sector by adhering to the financial data of the REITs Methodology- Financial data set of the REITs was firstly standardized by using median instead of mean.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After that normality test of the obtained scores was performed, the area of each score under standard normal distribution curve was calculated and the scores were moved to the 0-100‎range.‎Finally,‎scores‎were‎collected‎under‎5‎groups‎as‎“Very‎good,‎ Good,‎Not‎Bad,‎Bad‎and‎Very‎Bad”‎by‎using‎k-means algorithm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion- It will be important the REITs, in the sub-group especially in terms of the score distribution, to diversify their portfolio by extending their asset investments, to stabilize dividend payments and to take steps on institutionalization so that they are equivalent to REITs in the supergroup.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Real estate investment trusts (REITs) · Turkey · performance ranking

Abstract

Purpose- Aim of this study is to make the determinations related to the problems mentioned in the REIT sector in Turkey, to offer a solution for this issue, and to ensure the classification in the sector by adhering to the financial data of the REITs Methodology- Financial data set of the REITs was firstly standardized by using median instead of mean. Then, the scoring was performed according to defined coefficients. After that normality test of the obtained scores was performed, the area of each score under standard normal distribution curve was calculated and the scores were moved to the 0-100‎range.‎Finally,‎scores‎were‎collected‎under‎5‎groups‎as‎“Very‎good,‎ Good,‎Not‎Bad,‎Bad‎and‎Very‎Bad”‎by‎using‎k-means algorithm. Clustering were made on R Studio.Findings-Our analyses conducted that REITs traded on the Istanbul Stock Exchange are divided into two subgroups depending on their financial data. Conclusion- It will be important the REITs, in the sub-group especially in terms of the score distribution, to diversify their portfolio by extending their asset investments, to stabilize dividend payments and to take steps on institutionalization so that they are equivalent to REITs in the supergroup.

🔖

Cite This Article

HEPSEN, A., BERBEROGLU, M. G., AYDIN, O. (2017). REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS IN TURKEY: STRUCTURE, ANALYSIS, AND STRATEGY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 191–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/835111

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Alias,‎A.‎&‎Tho,‎S.‎2011,‎“Performance Analysis of REITs: Comparison Between M-REITs and UK-REITs”,‎Journal‎of‎Surveying,‎Construction‎and‎ Property, vol.2, special issue, pp.38-61. Ambrose,‎B.W.‎&‎Linneman,‎P.D.‎2001,‎“REIT‎Organizational‎Structure‎and‎Operating‎Characteristics”,‎Journal of Real Estate Research, vol.21, no.3, pp.141-162. Association of Real Estate and Real Estate Investment Companies, 2016, REIT Guide (Available at www.gyoder.org.tr). Basse,‎ T.‎ &‎ Friedrich,‎ M.‎ 2009,‎ “REITs‎ and‎ the‎ Financial‎ Crisis:‎ Empirical‎ Evidence‎ from‎ the‎ U.S.”,‎ International‎ Journal‎ of‎ Business‎ and‎ Management, vol.14, no.11, pp.1-10. Capital Markets Board (CMB), 2016, Monthly Statistical Bulletin (Available at www.spk.gov.tr). Chan,‎K.C.‎et‎al.1990,‎“Risk‎and‎Return‎on‎Real‎Estate:‎Evidence‎from‎Equity‎REITs”,‎The‎Journal‎of‎American‎Real‎Estate‎and‎Urban‎Economics‎ Association, vol.18, no.4, pp.431-452. Chaudhry,‎M.K.‎et‎al.,‎2004.‎“REITs‎and‎Idiosyncratic‎Risk”,‎Journal‎of‎Real‎Estate‎Research,‎vol.26,‎no.2,‎pp.207-222.
  2. Chiang, Y.H., et. al. 2008, “Time-Varying Performance of Four Asia-Pacific‎REITs”,‎Journal‎of‎Property‎Investment‎and‎Finance,‎vol.26,‎no.3,‎ pp.210–231. Edo,‎ L.‎ 2012,‎ “K-means‎ Clustering,‎ Algorithms‎ in‎ Data‎ Mining”,‎ [Online]‎ http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/‎ datamining2012aFiles/11_k_means_clustering.pdf European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA), 2016, Global REIT Survey, (Available at www.epra.org). Gabriel‎F.S.‎et‎al.2015,‎“Clustering‎Real‎Estate‎Investment‎Trusts:‎Brazil‎versus‎United‎States”,‎Journal‎of‎Management‎Research, vol.7, no.4, pp. 166-190
  3. Hamelink, F. & Hoesli, M. 2004, “What‎ Factors‎ Determine‎ International‎ Real‎ Estate‎ Security‎ Returns”,‎ Real‎ Estate‎ Economics,‎ vol.32,‎ no.3,‎ pp.437-462. İslamoğlu‎M.‎et‎al.‎2015,‎“An‎Evaluation‎of‎the‎Financial‎Performance‎of REITs in Borsa Istanbul: A Case Study Using the Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method”,‎International‎Journal‎of‎Financial‎Research,‎vol.6,‎no.2,‎pp.124-138. Kıyılar,‎M.‎&‎Hepşen,‎A.2010,‎“Performance‎Appraisal‎of‎Real‎Estate‎Investment‎Trusts‎(REITs):‎A‎Practice‎in‎Istanbul‎Stock‎Exchange”,‎Yönetim‎ Journal, vol.21, no.65, pp.11-23. Önder‎E.‎et‎al.‎2014,‎“REITs‎in‎Turkey‎Fundamentals‎vs‎Market”,‎International‎Journal‎of‎Latest‎Trends‎in‎Finance‎and‎Economic Sciences, vol.4, no.1, pp.1-15.
  4. Ratcliffe, C. & Dimowski,‎B.‎2007, ‎“The‎Responsiveness‎of‎LPT‎Returns‎and‎Their‎ Attributes”,‎Pacific‎ Rim‎Property‎ Research‎ Journal,‎vol.13,‎no.3,‎