Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

DETERMINING THE RIGHT MARKETING-RELATED METRICS TO MAXIMIZE PROFITABILITY IN BANKING

Pages
44–63
Publication Date
2018-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Rather than only examining the impact of a marketing mix, marketing performance assessments need to employ a comprehensive approach by also including investigations of the effects of marketing related resources and customer-based indicators on business performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose - Securing a sustainable competitive advantage is crucial in today’s highly turbulent market environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the requirements for achieving this objective is understanding the interrelationships between marketing activities and business performance through the use of a suitable method of marketing performance assessment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Rather than only examining the impact of a marketing mix, marketing performance assessments need to employ a comprehensive approach by also including investigations of the effects of marketing related resources and customer-based indicators on business performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marketing performance · panel data · profitability

Abstract

Purpose - Securing a sustainable competitive advantage is crucial in today’s highly turbulent market environment. One of the requirements for achieving this objective is understanding the interrelationships between marketing activities and business performance through the use of a suitable method of marketing performance assessment. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to propose a model that can be used to assess the business performance of banks from the perspective of marketing resources, marketing activities and customer-based brand equity. Methodology - The study employs panel data derived from the banking industry in Turkey. The model is tested using panel data regression with the EViews 9 program for short-term and long-term perspectives. Findings - The analyses show that the business performance of banks is affected by marketing resources, marketing activities and customer-based equity with variable impacts affecting short-term and long-term outlooks. Conclusion - Marketing performance assessment is a key requirement for creating the most effective marketing strategy and that can be done by determining how marketing-related factors impact business performance. Rather than only examining the impact of a marketing mix, marketing performance assessments need to employ a comprehensive approach by also including investigations of the effects of marketing related resources and customer-based indicators on business performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDOGAN, C. B., URAY, N., ULENGİN, B. (2018). DETERMINING THE RIGHT MARKETING-RELATED METRICS TO MAXIMIZE PROFITABILITY IN BANKING. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 44–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/835085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. New York: The Free Press.
  2. AMA. (1959). Analyzing and Improving Marketing Performance (Management Report No. 32.) New York: American Management Association. Ambler, T. (2003). Marketing and the Bottom Line. London: FT Prentice Hall. Ambler, T., Bhattacharya, C. B., Edell, J., Keller, K. L., Lemon, K. N., and Mittal, V. (2002). Relating brand and customer perspectives on marketing management. Journal of Service Research, 5 (August), 13-25.
  3. Ambler, T. and Kokkinaki, F. (1997). Measures of marketing success. Journal of Marketing Management, 13, 665-678.
  4. Ambler, T., Kokkinaki, F., and Puntoni, S. (2004). Assessing marketing performance: reasons for metrics selection. Journal of Marketing Management, 20 (3/4), 475–498.
  5. Amit, R. and Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rents. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33–46.
  6. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley. Baker, W. E. and Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 27 (4), 411-427.
  7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120.
  8. Bennett, R. (2007). The use of marketing metrics by British fundraising charities: a survey of current practice. Journal of Marketing Management, 23 (9), 959-989.
  9. Bhargava, M, Dubelaar, C., and Ramaswami, S. (1994). Reconciling diverse measures of performance: a conceptual framework and a test of methodology. Journal of Business Research, 31, 235- 246. Bodell, L. and Earle, C. (2004). The yin and yang of marketing measurement: four principles of innovation. Interactive Marketing, 6 (2), 130140. Bonoma T. V. (1985). The Marketing Edge: Making Strategies Work. New York: Free Press.
  10. Boulding, W., Lee, F., and Staelin, R. (1994). Mastering the mix: do advertising, promotion, and sales force activities lead to differentiation? Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (May), 159-172.
  11. Brownlie, D. T. (1993). The marketing audit: a metrology and explanation. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 11 (1), 4-13.
  12. Capella, I and Seckely, W. (1978). The marketing audit: methods, problems and perspectives. Akron Business and Economic Review, Fall, 37-41.
  13. Chendall, R. H. and Langfield-Smith, K. 2007. Multiple perspectives of performance measures, European Management Journal, 25 (4),