SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AND THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF BANKS IN AFRICA

Edward ATTAH-BOTCHWEY
Michael Gift SOKU
David Mensah AWADZIE
Pages
43–57
Publication Date
2022-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings– The results suggest that economic, social, and governance reporting of sustainability content (in the financial statement) has a significant positive association with Tobin's Q and Return on Assets (ROA).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose– This study examined the relationship between sustainability reporting and bank performance in Africa.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Unlike previous studies that solely dwelled on accounting measures of performance, this study adopted both accounting (i.e., return on assets) and market-based measures of firm performance (i.e., Tobin's Q).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings– The results suggest that economic, social, and governance reporting of sustainability content (in the financial statement) has a significant positive association with Tobin's Q and Return on Assets (ROA).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sustainability · return on assets · bank performance

Abstract

Purpose– This study examined the relationship between sustainability reporting and bank performance in Africa. Unlike previous studies that solely dwelled on accounting measures of performance, this study adopted both accounting (i.e., return on assets) and market-based measures of firm performance (i.e., Tobin's Q). Methodology– The study relied on secondary data gathered from the audited financial statements of listed banks in Africa over ten years from 2010 to 2020. Notably, the financial statements of 20 listed banks (drawn from Ghana, Nigeria, and South Africa) were subjected to quantitative content analysis to quantify the extent of sustainability content. It was guided by the sustainability reporting framework developed by the global reporting initiative. The content analysis aims to identify and classify the extent to which firms report on Economic, governance, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainability. Besides, the financial statement figures aided the computation of a performance measure (return on assets and Tobin's Q) for the banks. Concerning data analysis, the study utilized a panel fixed effect regression model to estimate the relationship between sustainability reporting and firm performance. Findings– The results suggest that economic, social, and governance reporting of sustainability content (in the financial statement) has a significant positive association with Tobin's Q and Return on Assets (ROA). Furthermore, the study's findings suggest that banks ' reportage of environmental sustainability content has a significant positive effect on ROA. However, it has no significant effect on Tobin's Q. Conclusion– Generally, the study concludes that increased sustainability reporting enhances bank performance in the long term. Among others, the study recommends that policymakers develop a sustainability framework specific to the banking industry's needs.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATTAH-BOTCHWEY, E., SOKU, M. G., AWADZIE, D. M. (2022). SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AND THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF BANKS IN AFRICA. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 43–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/834983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abernathy, J, Stefaniak, C, Wilkins, A, & Olson, J. (2017). Literature Review and Research Opportunities on the Credibility of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. American Journal of Business, 32(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJB-04-2016-0013 Francis Aboagye-Otchere Ibrahim Bedi Teddy Ossei Kwakye, (2012),"Corporate governance and disclosure practices of Ghanaian listed companies", Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 2(2), 140 - 161 Abukari, A. J., Abdul-Hamid, I. K. (2018). “Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Telecommunications Sector in Ghana.” International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 3 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0025-9.
  2. Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: an enabling role for accounting research", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929
  3. Blaesing, D. (2013). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung in Deutschland und den USA: Berichtspraxis, Determinanten und Eigenkapitalkostenwirkungen. Frankfurt/M: PL Acad. Research. Bonsón, E., & Bednárová, M. (2015). CSR reporting practices of Eurozone companies. Revista de Contabilidad, 18(2), 182-193.
  4. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large U.K. companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7‐8), 1168-1188.
  5. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132.
  6. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
  7. Chen, J. C., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization–society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of business ethics, 97(4), 651-665.
  8. Chen, Y. C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169-190.
  9. Crolic, C., Zheng, Y., Hoegg, J., & Alba, J. W. (2019). The influence of product aesthetics on consumer inference making. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(4), 398-408.
  10. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.