Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION ON THE SYNERGETIC EFFECTS OF CARBON NANOTUBE AND GRAPHENE OXIDE ON CARBON FIBER REINFORCED EPOXY PREPREG COMPOSITES

Pages
144–155
Publication Date
2020-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, approximately twofold ILSS value was reached by CNP addition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Enhancement of electrical properties of carbon fiber reinforced (CFR) epoxy matrix composites was aimed by incorporating varying amounts (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, and 15 wt% -percentage by weight) of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) into the resin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides, within these CNP percentages, carbon nanotube (CNT) to graphene oxide (GO) composition ratio was also changed (100:0, 80:20, 50:50, 20:80, and 0:100) in order to investigate the synergy between these two type of CNPs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, approximately twofold ILSS value was reached by CNP addition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Carbon epoxy prepreg composite · Carbon nanotube · Graphene oxide

Abstract

Enhancement of electrical properties of carbon fiber reinforced (CFR) epoxy matrix composites was aimed by incorporating varying amounts (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, and 15 wt% -percentage by weight) of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) into the resin. Besides, within these CNP percentages, carbon nanotube (CNT) to graphene oxide (GO) composition ratio was also changed (100:0, 80:20, 50:50, 20:80, and 0:100) in order to investigate the synergy between these two type of CNPs. Carbon/epoxy composites were produced via prepregging technique, followed by compression molding method. The change in electrical conductivity of the composites was examined in three directions: Fiber direction, transverse direction, and through-thickness direction. Additionally, mechanical property investigation was carried out by determining the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of composites by conducting short beam shear tests (SBS). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were performed for morphology investigation and element characterization of the CNP surfaces. The results revealed up to 5.8, 217, and 34 fold increases in conductivity values in fiber, transverse, and thickness directions, respectively, when compared to that of the neat composite. Also, approximately twofold ILSS value was reached by CNP addition.

🔖

Cite This Article

BERKAY, G., ERDEN, S. (2020). INVESTIGATION ON THE SYNERGETIC EFFECTS OF CARBON NANOTUBE AND GRAPHENE OXIDE ON CARBON FIBER REINFORCED EPOXY PREPREG COMPOSITES. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 144–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/83496

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Tuakta C. 2005. Use of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite in Bridge Structures (Master’s thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts, Boston. Autar, KK. 2006. Mechanics of Composite Materials. Taylor & Francis Group. Sanjay KM. 2001. Composites Manufacturing: Materials, Product, and Process Engineering. CRC PRESS. Smallman RE, Bishop RJ. 1999. Modern Physical Metallurgy and Materials Engineering. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. Taherian R, Kausar A. 2018. Electrical Conductivity in Polymer-Based Composites Experiments, Modelling, and Applications. Elsevier. TS EN ISO 2076:2014; Tekstil- Yapay lifler - Grup isimleri (ISO 2076:2013). ANKARA: Türk Standartları Enstitüsü. Agarwal BD, Broutman LJ, Chandrashekhara K. 2006. Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites. John Wiley & Sons. Goldstain A. 1997. Handbook of Nanophase Materials. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. Rao CNR, Müller A, Cheetham AK. 2005. The Chemistry of Nanomaterials Volume 1. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA. Miller JC, Serrato R, RepresasCardenas JM, Kundahl G. 2004. The Handbook of Nanotechnology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Liveri VT. 2006. Controlled Synthesis of Nanoparticles in Microheterogeneous Systems. USA: Springer. Pérez J, Bax L, Escolano C. 2005. NRM Nanoroadmap Project: Roadmap Report on Nanoparticles. Willems & van den Willenberg (W&W): Spain. Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR. 2006. Drawing conclusions from graphene. Physic World, 19-33. Sharifzadeh M. 2006.
  2. Nanotechnology Sector Report, Cronus Capital Markets. Ma PC, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim JK. 2010. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 41, 1345-1367.
  3. Lonjon A, Demont P, Dantras E, Lacabanne C. 2012. Electrical conductivity improvement of aeronautical carbon fiber reinforced polyepoxy composites by insertion of carbon nanotubes. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 358(15), 1859-1862.
  4. Sawi IE, Olivier PA, Demont P, Bougherara H. 2012. Processing and electrical characterization of a unidirectional CFRP composite filled with double walled carbon nanotubes. Composites Science and Technology 73, 19-26.
  5. Qin W, Vautard F, Drzal LT, Yu J. 2015. Mechanical and electrical properties of carbon fiber composites with incorporation of graphene nanoplatelets at the fiber–matrix interphase. Composites: Part B 69, 335–340.
  6. Imran KA, Shivakumar KN. 2019. Graphene-modified carbon