SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisat ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Güncel Araştırmalar / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

The Factors Affecting Using Professional Judgment in Independent Auditing: Evidences from Turkey

Bağımsız Denetimde Mesleki Yargı Kullanımına Etki Eden Faktörler: Türkiye Örneği

Elçin ŞİŞMANOĞLU
Dursun ARIKBOĞA
Pages
141–188
Publication Date
2018-06-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to importance of experiences and individual opinions of independent auditors, qualitative research method has been used in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Using professional judgment, which constitutes the essence of financial reporting in accordance with newly released issues in the audit process at different levels, is one of the leading important issues for independent auditors as well as accounting process in the rapidly changing world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the opinions related to the factors affecting using professional judgment in independent auditing in Turkey have been determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to importance of experiences and individual opinions of independent auditors, qualitative research method has been used in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:bağımsız denetim · bağımsız denetçi · mesleki yargı

Abstract

Using professional judgment, which constitutes the essence of financial reporting in accordance with newly released issues in the audit process at different levels, is one of the leading important issues for independent auditors as well as accounting process in the rapidly changing world. In this study, the opinions related to the factors affecting using professional judgment in independent auditing in Turkey have been determined. Due to importance of experiences and individual opinions of independent auditors, qualitative research method has been used in this study.

Özet

Hızla değişen dünyada, muhasebe sürecinde olduğu gibi bağımsız denetim sürecinde de yeni çıkan konular ve standartlar doğrultusunda finansal raporlamanın özünü de oluşturan farklı düzeylerde mesleki yargı kullanım gerekliliği, bağımsız denetçiler için de önemli konuların başında gelmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de bağımsız denetimde mesleki yargı kullanımına yönelik bağımsız denetçilerin görüşleri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bağımsız denetçilerin tecrübeleri ve konu ile ilgili bireysel görüşleri önemli olduğu için, bu çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİŞMANOĞLU, E., ARIKBOĞA, D. (2018). The Factors Affecting Using Professional Judgment in Independent Auditing: Evidences from Turkey. İktisat ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Güncel Araştırmalar, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 141–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/833631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aghazadeh, S. (2012). Expressed confidence and skepticism: The effect of expressed confidence on auditor judgments (doctoral dissertation). The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma. Bhattacharjee, S., & Moreno, K. K. (2013). The role of auditors’ emotions and moods on audit judgment: A research summary with suggested practice implications. Current Issues in Auditing, 7(2), 1–8.
  2. Bik, O. P. G. (2010). The behavior of assurance professionals: A cross-cultural perspective. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.
  3. Bonner, S. E. (1999). Judgment and decision-making research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 385–398.
  4. Chiang, H.-T., & Lin, S.-L. (2012). Effect of auditor’s judgment and specialization on their differential opinion between semiannual and annual financial reports. Global Journal of Business Research, 6(4), 1–22.
  5. Cianci, A. M., & Bierstaker, J. L. (2009). The impact of positive and negative mood on the hypothesis generation and ethical judgments of auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 119–144.
  6. Danescu, T., & Chira, A. (2014). Professional Judgment and Reticence to Apply Sampling Techniques. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1253–1258.
  7. Erturan, İ. E. (2007). Influence of culture on auditor and audit process: A study on auditors on Turkey (doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University, Eskişehir. Figueroa, C. R., & Cardona, R. J. C. (2013). Does Experience Affect Auditors’ Professional Judgement? Internal Controls and Fraud Decisions. In Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings (Vol. 8, pp. 221–222). Institute for Business & Finance Research. IAASB, ICAS, & IAAER. (2015). Research Finding Opportunity. Retrieved February 26, 2016, from http://files.iaaer.org/news/2015_IAASB_ICAS_IAAER_Research.pdf?1427121305
  8. IFAC. (2010). ISA 200, Overall Objective of the Independent Auditor, and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Retrieved April 16, 2018, from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a008-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-200.pdf
  9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. In D. Kahreman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Herustics and Biases (pp. 32–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Lehmann, C. M., & Norman, C. S. (2006). The effects of experience on complex problem representation and judgment in auditing: An experimental investigation. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18(1), 65–83.
  11. Messier Jr, W. F