SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Old Uyghur Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

An Old Uyghur Dharmaśarīrasūtra According to a Chinese Version

Çince Orijinaline göre Eski Uygurca Dharmaśarīrasūtra’nın bir Fragmanı

Peter ZIEME
Pages
5–18
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The piece published here testifies once more that Uyghur Buddhists studied on this sūtra or, more generally, on dogmatic terms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Old Uyghur fragment U 4830 (T II Y 6) of the Berlin Turfan Collection is edited and compared here together with the original Chinese passage of the Dharmaśarīrasūtra (Foshuo) fashen jing (佛説)法身經 (T.XVII.0766.0699b18-700c08).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bilingual Sanskrit/Old Uyghur fragments of the text were already known.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The piece published here testifies once more that Uyghur Buddhists studied on this sūtra or, more generally, on dogmatic terms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eski Uygurca · iki dilli metinler · Dharmaśarīrasūtra

Abstract

The Old Uyghur fragment U 4830 (T II Y 6) of the Berlin Turfan Collection is edited and compared here together with the original Chinese passage of the Dharmaśarīrasūtra (Foshuo) fashen jing (佛説)法身經 (T.XVII.0766.0699b18-700c08). Bilingual Sanskrit/Old Uyghur fragments of the text were already known. The piece published here testifies once more that Uyghur Buddhists studied on this sūtra or, more generally, on dogmatic terms.

Özet

Berlin Turfan Koleksiyonu'nda bulunan Eski Uygurca fragmanı U 4830 (T II Y 6) burada Dharmaśarīrasūtra (Foshuo) fashen jing (佛説) 法身 經 (T.XVII.0766.0699b18-700c08)'in orijinal Çince pasajı ile birlikte düzenlenmiş ve karşılaştırılmıştır. Sanskritçe / Eski Uygurca iki dilli metin parçaları zaten biliniyordu. Burada yayınlanan fragman bir kez daha Uygur Budistlerinin sûtrayla veya belki de daha genel olarak dogmatik terimler dizisiyle ilgilendiğini kanıtlıyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZIEME, P. (2021). An Old Uyghur Dharmaśarīrasūtra According to a Chinese Version. International Journal of Old Uyghur Studies, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 5–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/833175

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bongard-Levin, G.M. & Tyomkin, Ė.N. 1969. Fragment of the Saka version of the Dharmaśarīra-sūtra from the N.F. Petrovsky collection. In: Indo-Iranian Journal 11.4 (1969), 269-280.
  2. Bongard-Levin, G.M. & Vorobyova-Desjatovskaja, M.I. 1985. Pamjatniki indijskoj pis’mennosti iz Central’nogo Azii, vypusk 1. Moskva. Fan, Jingjing & Peng, Jinzhang & Wang, Haiyun. 2018. Three More Leaves of the Sanskrit-Uigur bilingual Dharmaśarīrasūtra in Brāhmī Script. In: Acta Orientalia Academia Scientiarum Hungaricae 71, 285–301.
  3. Gabain, Annemarie von. 1954. Türkische Turfantexte VIII. Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin Kl. Für Sprachen, Literatur und Kunst Jg. 1952, Nr. 7. Berlin. Hartmann, Jens-Uwe & Wille, Klaus. 2014a. Further Collections of Sanskrit Manuscripts from Central Asia. In: From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research Papers Presented at the Conference Indic Buddhist Manuscripts: The State of the Field Stanford, June 15–19 2009. Edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann. Wien, 247-255.
  4. Hartmann, Jens-Uwe & Wille, Klaus. 2014b. The Central Asian Sanskrit Fragments in the Pelliot Collection (Paris). In: From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research Papers Presented at the Conference Indic Buddhist Manuscripts: The State of the Field Stanford, June 15–19 2009. Edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann. Wien, 213-222.
  5. Hori, Shin'ichirō. 2005. Additional Notes on the Unidentified Sanskrit Fragments in the Ōtani Collection at Ryūkoku University Library. In: Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies 9 (2005), 91–97.
  6. Maue, Dieter. 2008. The equanimity of the Tathāgata. Aspects of research into Central Asian Buddhism, ed. by Zieme, Peter. Turnhout (Silk Road Studies XVI), 179-190.
  7. Maue, Dieter. 2015. Alttürkische Handschriften. Teil 19. Dokumente in Brāhmī und tibetischer Schrift, Teil 2, Stuttgart. Maue, Dieter & Zieme, Peter. 2012. Two More Leaves of the Dharmaśarīrasūtra in Sanskrit and Uigur. In: Historical and Philological Studies of China’s Western Regions (西域歷史語言研究集刊), 2012 (5), 145-155.
  8. Nattier, Jan. 2003. The Ten Epithets of the Buddha in the Translations of Zhi Qian 支謙. In: Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology 6, 207-250.
  9. Özertural, Zekine. 2021. Alttürkische Handschriften Teil 4. Varia Buddhica: Buddhistische Gedichte und kleinere Sūtra-Texte. Stuttgart (VOHD 13,12). Sanskrit-Wörte