Journals / International Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Simulation of rice straw gasification in bubbling bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS

Pages
7–14
Publication Date
2019-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, results showed that the developed bubbling bed gasifier model can be robust model, if gasifier temperature is selected within the 500–1000 °C temperature range.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The global dependence on fossil fuels and the environmental effects of them are some of the factors that urge research on using biomass sources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The gasifier temperature and steam flow rate are the most important parameters that influence the chemical composition of the syngas for the rice straw gasification in bubbling bed gasifier.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, results showed that the developed bubbling bed gasifier model can be robust model, if gasifier temperature is selected within the 500–1000 °C temperature range.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rice Straw · Bubbling Bed Gasifier · Biomass Gasification

Abstract

The global dependence on fossil fuels and the environmental effects of them are some of the factors that urge research on using biomass sources. Gasification is a process which converts carbonaceous materials into syngas. In this study, a bubbling bed gasification model is developed for the gasification of rice straw as a feedstock by using ASPEN PLUS. Thermodynamic equilibrium model which is based on the minimization of the Gibbs free energy of the system was used. The results of gasification in bubbling bed gasifier were verified by using data from literature. The gasifier temperature and steam flow rate are the most important parameters that influence the chemical composition of the syngas for the rice straw gasification in bubbling bed gasifier. Increasing steam-to-biomass ratio enhances H2, CH4 and CO production, while decreases CO2. Furthermore, results showed that the developed bubbling bed gasifier model can be robust model, if gasifier temperature is selected within the 500–1000 °C temperature range.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, S., ÖZVEREN, U. (2019). Simulation of rice straw gasification in bubbling bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS. International Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 7–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/832817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. R. Segurado, S. Pereira, D. Correia, M. Costa, “Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019
  2. A. Moilanen, M. Nasrullah, E. Kurkela, “The effect of biomass feedstock type and process parameters on achieving the total carbon conversion in the large scale fluidized bed gasification of biomass,” Environ Progress Sustain Energy, 28, 355–9, 2009
  3. L. Devi, K.J. Ptasinski, F.J. Janssen, “A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes, Biomass and bioenergy”, 24(2), 125-140, 2003
  4. S. Sansaniwal, K. Pal, M. Rosen, S. Tyagi, “Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 363-384, 2017
  5. L. P. R. Pala, Q. Wang, G. Kolb, V. Hessel, “Steam gasification of biomass with subsequent syngas adjustment using shift reaction for syngas production: An Aspen Plus model,” Renewable Energy, Volume 101, Pages 484-492, February 2017
  6. M. Al-Zareer, I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, “Effects of various gasification parameters and operating conditions on syngas and hydrogen production,” Chem Eng Res Des, 115, 1–18, 2016
  7. A. Erkiaga, G. Lopez, M. Amutio, J. Bilbao, M. Olazar, “Influence of operating conditions on the steam gasification of biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor,” Chem Eng J, 237:259–67, 2014
  8. N. Mazaheria, A.H. Akbarzadeha, E. Madadiana, M. Lefsruda, “Systematic review of research guidelines for numerical simulation of biomass gasification for bioenergy production,” Energy Conversion and Management, 2018
  9. S.E. Hosseini, M.A. Wahid, A. Ganjehkaviri, “An overview of renewable hydrogen production from thermochemical process of oil palm solid waste in Malaysia,” Energy Convers Manage, 94:415–29, 2015
  10. R. Gadsboll, J. Thomsen, C. Bang-Moller, J. Ahrenfeldt, U.B. Henriksen, “Solid oxide fuel cells powered by biomass gasification for high efficiency power generation,” Energy, 131:198–206, 2017
  11. E.G. Pereira, J.N. Silva, J.L. Oliveira, C.S. Machado, “Sustainable energy: a review of gasification technologies,” Renew Sustain Energy, 16:4753–62, Rev 2012
  12. S. Farzad, M.A. Mandegari, J.F. Görgens, “A critical review on biomass gasification, cogasification, and their environmental assessments,” Biofuel Res J, 12:483–95, 2016
  13. S.K. Sansaniwala, M.A. Rosenb, S.K. Tyagic, “Global challenges in the sustainable development of