Journals / International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Numerical energy and exergy analysis of cooling systems: low GWP alternative refrigerants (R450A and R1234ze) to R134a

Pages
113–121
Publication Date
2021-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the analysis, it was concluded that R450A and R1234ze can be used instead of R134a.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The use of new generation refrigerants in heating and cooling systems operating according to vapor compression cycles and the preference of renewable energy sources is very important to reduce the negative effects on the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Here, the energy and exergy performance of refrigerant R450A and R1234ze, which are alternatives to R134a, were theoretically examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained from the analysis, it was concluded that R450A and R1234ze can be used instead of R134a.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Global warming · New generation refrigerants · R134a/R1234ze mixture

Abstract

The use of new generation refrigerants in heating and cooling systems operating according to vapor compression cycles and the preference of renewable energy sources is very important to reduce the negative effects on the environment. Here, the energy and exergy performance of refrigerant R450A and R1234ze, which are alternatives to R134a, were theoretically examined. Energy and exergy analysis of cooling system were performed under the same working conditions (source temperature is between -15 and 15 oC, and heat sink temperature is constant 30 oC). The COP values of R134a, R1234ze, and R450A were 2.00, 1.98 and 1.97, respectively, while the heat source temperature was -15 oC. The heat source temperature was 15 oC, the COP values of R134a, R1234ze, and R450A were 4.82, 4.83 and 4.79, respectively. Under the given operating conditions, the highest total exergy destruction occurred at R134a, while the lowest total Exergy destruction occurred at R1234ze. The refrigerant with the highest and lowest cooling capacity was R134a and R1234ze. According to the results obtained from the analysis, it was concluded that R450A and R1234ze can be used instead of R134a.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, R., KUMAŞ, K., AKYÜZ, A. Ö. (2021). Numerical energy and exergy analysis of cooling systems: low GWP alternative refrigerants (R450A and R1234ze) to R134a. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 113–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/832691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. López-Belchí, A. 2019. Assessment of a mini-channel condenser at high ambient temperatures based on experimental measurements working with R134a, R513A and R1234yf. Applied Thermal Engineering, 155, 341-353.
  2. Kumaş, K. and Akyüz, A. 2020. Performance Analysis of R450A Refrigerant in Vapor Compression Cooling System for Sustainable Environment. Akademia Journal of Nature and Human Sciences, 6(1),57-71.
  3. Gomrı, R., Karoune, N. and Khellaf, N. 2018. Energy and Exergy Analyses of Different Transcritical CO2 Refrigeration Cycles. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(2),547-555.
  4. Demir, O. and Bilen, K. 2021.
  5. Energy and Exergy Analysis of Air, Water and Ground Source Heat Pumps for Different Refrigerants. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 8(2), 688-705.
  6. Özden, E., Parlamış, H. and Büker, M. 2020. Numerical Study on Cooling Performance of a Counter-flow Indirect Evaporative Cooler. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering,7(3),1074-1087.
  7. Demirci, E., Özkaymak, M., Koşan, M., Akkoç A. E. and Aktaş, M. 2020. Developments in Natural Refrigerant Usage. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences, 6(3),184-199.
  8. Güngör, U. and Hoşöz, M. 2020. Experimental Analysis of the Effect of Expansion Device Type on the Performance of an R134a Automobile Air Conditioning System. Kocaeli University Journal of Science, 3(2), 214-222.
  9. Yıldırım, R. and Yıldız, A. 2020. Energy, environmental and enviroeconomic analysis of the use R134a/R1234yf (10/90) as replace to R134a in a vapor compression cooling system. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 7(4), 101-106.
  10. Mota-Babiloni, A., Navarro-Esbrí, J., Barragán, Á., Molés, F. and Peris, B. 2014. Drop-in energy performance evaluation of R1234yf and R1234ze in a vapor compression system as R134a replacements. Applied Thermal Engineering, 71(1), 259-265.
  11. Feng, B., Yang, Z. and Zhai, R. 2018. Experimental study on the influence of the flame retardants on the flammability of R1234yf. Energy, 143, 212-218.
  12. Yıldız, A. and Yıldırım, R. 2020. Energy and Environmental Analysis of Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems Using an Alternative Refrigerant (R513A) to R134a. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 8(3),1817-1828.
  13. Şencan Şahin, A., Kovacı, T. and Dikmen, E. 2021. A GEP-Based Model Approach for Estimating Thermodynamic Properties of R513A Refrigerant. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 8(1), 376-388.
  14. Makhnatch, P., Mota-Babiloni, A. and Khodabandeh R. 2017. Experimental study