SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gıda / 2021 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

INFLUENCE OF WHEY PROTEIN ISOLATE-WAX COMPOSITE EDIBLE COATING ON THE QUALITY OF FRUIT BARS

PEYNİR ALTI SUYU PROTEİN İZOLATI-VAKS BAZLI KOMPOZİT YENİLEBİLİR KAPLAMANIN MEYVE BARLARININ KALİTESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Zeynep Feyza KARAKAŞ
İsmail TONTUL
Journal
Gıda
Pages
21–31
Publication Date
2020-12-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, edible coating using WPI and carnauba wax composite was suggested for fruit bars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Composite edible coating of fruit bars using whey protein isolate (WPI) and waxes (beeswax or carnauba wax) was tested in the present study to prevent physicochemical changes during storage in the present study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Dry matter content (96.16-98.43 g/100 g), colour, hardness (54.17-258.16 N), total phenolic content (3097.7-9752.9 mg GAE/kg dm), ascorbic acid content (133.4-203.9 mg/kg dm), antioxidant activity (DPPH: 3681.1-4538.6 mg/kg dm, FRAP: 2531.5-3057.4 mg/kg dm) and peroxide value (1.85-2.06 meq peroxide/kg oil) of samples were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, edible coating using WPI and carnauba wax composite was suggested for fruit bars.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kompozit yenilebilir kaplama · balmumu · karnauba mumu

Abstract

Composite edible coating of fruit bars using whey protein isolate (WPI) and waxes (beeswax or carnauba wax) was tested in the present study to prevent physicochemical changes during storage in the present study. Dry matter content (96.16-98.43 g/100 g), colour, hardness (54.17-258.16 N), total phenolic content (3097.7-9752.9 mg GAE/kg dm), ascorbic acid content (133.4-203.9 mg/kg dm), antioxidant activity (DPPH: 3681.1-4538.6 mg/kg dm, FRAP: 2531.5-3057.4 mg/kg dm) and peroxide value (1.85-2.06 meq peroxide/kg oil) of samples were determined. Composite edible coating resulted in higher dry matter content and hardness compared to WPI-coated samples. While the total phenolic content of samples coated with WPI+carnauba wax was the lowest, it provided the highest ascorbic acid content and antioxidant activity. A gradual decrease in all analysed parameters except dry matter content and peroxide value was observed throughout the storage period. Overall, edible coating using WPI and carnauba wax composite was suggested for fruit bars.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, depolama süresince meyve barlarında gerçekleşen fizikokimyasal değişiklikleri önlemek için peynir altı suyu protein izolatı (PASP) ve vaks (balmumu veya karnauba mumu) bazlı yenilebilir kaplamalar test edilmiştir. Örneklerin kuru madde içeriği (96.16-98.43 g/100 g), renk, sertlik (54.17-258.16 N), toplam fenolik madde içeriği (3097.7-9752.9 mg GAE/kg dm), askorbik asit içeriği (133.4-203.9 mg/kg dm), antioksidan aktivite (DPPH: 3681.1-4538.6 mg/kg dm, FRAP: 2531.5-3057.4 mg/kg dm) ve peroksit değeri (1.85-2.06 meq peroksit / kg yağ) belirlenmiştir. Yenilebilir kompozit kaplama, PASP kaplı numunelere kıyasla daha yüksek kuru madde içeriği ve sertlik sağlamıştır. PASP karnauba mumu ile kaplanmış numunelerin toplam fenolik içeriği en düşük iken, bu örnekler en yüksek askorbik asit içeriği ve antioksidan aktiviteye sahip olmuştur. Depolama süresi boyunca kuru madde içeriği ve peroksit değeri dışında analiz edilen tüm parametrelerde kademeli bir düşüş gözlenmiştir. Genel olarak, meyve barları için PASP ve karnauba mumu bazlı kompozit yenilebilir kaplama önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAŞ, Z. F., TONTUL, İ. (2020). INFLUENCE OF WHEY PROTEIN ISOLATE-WAX COMPOSITE EDIBLE COATING ON THE QUALITY OF FRUIT BARS. Gıda, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 21–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/83268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem., 239 (1): 70-76, https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292
  2. Bilbao-Sainz C, Chiou BS, Punotai K, Olson D, Williams T, Wood D, Rodov V, Poverenov E, McHugh T. (2018). Layer-by-layer alginate and fungal chitosan based edible coatings applied to fruit bars. J. Food Sci., 83 (7): 1880-1887, https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14186
  3. Bonilla J, Poloni T, Sobral PJA. (2018). Active edible coatings with Boldo extract added and their application on nut products: reducing the oxidative rancidity rate. Int. J Food Sc.i Technol., 53 (3): 700-708, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13645
  4. Bourtoom T. (2008). Edible films and coatings: characteristics and properties. Int. Food Res. J., 15 (3): 237-248,
  5. Bravin B, Peressini D, Sensidoni A. (2006). Development and application of polysaccharide–lipid edible coating to extend shelf-life of dry bakery products. J. Food Eng., 76 (3): 280-290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.05.021
  6. Cerqueira MA, Sousa-Gallagher MJ, Macedo I, Rodriguez-Aguilera R, Souza BWS, Teixeira JA, Vicente AA. (2010). Use of galactomannan edible coating application and storage temperature for prolonging shelf-life of “Regional” cheese. J. Food Eng., 97 (1): 87-94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.09.019
  7. Eom H, Chang Y, Lee ES, Choi HD, Han J. (2018). Development of a starch/gum-based edible coating for rice cakes to retard retrogradation during storage. LWT, 97: 516-522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.07.044
  8. Eyiz V, Tontul İ, Türker S. (2020). The effect of edible coatings on physical and chemical characteristics of fruit bars. J. Food Meas. Charact., 14 (3): 1775-1783, 10.1007/s11694-020-00425-0 Fernández-León MF, Fernández-León AM, Lozano M, Ayuso MC, Amodio ML, Colelli G, González-Gómez D. (2013). Retention of quality and functional values of broccoli ‘Parthenon’stored in modified atmosphere packaging. Food Cont., 31 (2): 302-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.10.012
  9. Haq MA, Alam MJ, Hasnain A. (2013). Gum Cordia: A novel edible coating to increase the shelf life of Chilgoza (Pinus gerardiana). LWT, 50 (1): 306-311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.008
  10. Islam MZ, Saha T, Monalisa K, Hoque MM. (2019). Effect of starch edible coating on drying characteristics and antioxidant properties of papaya. J. Food Meas. Charact., 13 (4): 2951-2960, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-019-00215-3 Javanmard M.