SavedAdd your journal

Journals / GSI Journals Serie B: Advancements in Business and Economics / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Examination Social Capital as a Strategic Management Tool in Sports and Some International Comparisons

Sporda Stratejik Bir Yönetim Aracı Olarak Sosyal Sermaye Kavramının İncelenmesi ve Bazı Uluslararası Karşılaştırmalar

Arif YÜCE
Volkan AYDOĞDU
Sevda GÖKCE YÜCE
Hakan KATIRCI
Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2019-08-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it is seen that the majority of countries integrated the social capital into sports management strategies have benefited differently from each of Bourdieu, Coleman and Putnam's views and obtained positive outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social capital in sport emphasises how changes regarding developing social values with sports will be used and will be used to take an action.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, social capital contains social development-based objectives such as developing new strategies inside sport policies for societies to engage with sports, increase success and performance in sport area, offer developmental opportunities to people at all ages, connecting children in school period and different local sport societies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is seen that the majority of countries integrated the social capital into sports management strategies have benefited differently from each of Bourdieu, Coleman and Putnam's views and obtained positive outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Spor · Sosyal Sermaye · Sporda Sosyal Sermaye

Abstract

Social capital in sport emphasises how changes regarding developing social values with sports will be used and will be used to take an action. Accordingly, social capital contains social development-based objectives such as developing new strategies inside sport policies for societies to engage with sports, increase success and performance in sport area, offer developmental opportunities to people at all ages, connecting children in school period and different local sport societies. In this context, the purpose of this research is to examine the concept of social capital as a strategic management tool in sport with the help of document analysis method. Accordingly, examine sport policies Czechia, Denmark, England, France, Ireland and Italy countries which integrated social capital into their sport policies and evaluate them within the context of Bourdieu, Coleman and Putnam’s views, who are the pioneers of the concept of social capital has formed the purpose. As a result of the research, social capital as a strategic management tool in sports; the sociological dimension of sports and social capital, encouraging participation in sports, determination of sports policies and management of sports facilities has important roles. In addition, it is seen that the majority of countries integrated the social capital into sports management strategies have benefited differently from each of Bourdieu, Coleman and Putnam's views and obtained positive outcomes.

Özet

Sporda sosyal sermaye, spor aracılığı ile gelişmekte olan toplumsal değerlere yönelik değişimin nasıl kullanılacağına ve harekete geçirileceğine vurgu yapmaktadır. Buna göre; sosyal sermaye, spor politikaları içerisinde toplulukların spora katılımı için yeni stratejiler geliştirmek, spor alanında başarı ve performansı arttırmak, her yaştan insana kendilerini geliştirme fırsatı sunmak, okul çağındaki çocuklar ile farklı yerel spor topluluklarını bir araya getirmek gibi toplumları kalkındırma temelli amaçlar barındırmaktadır. Bu kapsamda bu araştırmanın temel amacı; sporda stratejik bir yönetim aracı olarak sosyal sermaye kavramını doküman analizi yöntemi ile incelemektir. Buna göre sosyal sermaye kavramını spor politikaları içerisine entegre eden Çekya, Danimarka, İngiltere, Fransa, İrlanda ve İtalya’nın sosyal sermaye ve spora yönelik yönetim stratejilerini incelemek ve sosyal sermaye kavramının öncüleri olan Bourdieu, Coleman ve Putnam’ın görüşleri kapsamında değerlendirmek araştırmanın bir diğer amacını oluşturmuştur. Elde edilen araştırma bulguları sonucunda sporda stratejik bir yönetim aracı olarak sosyal sermayenin; spor ve sosyal sermayeye ilişkin sosyolojik boyut, spora katılımın teşvik edilmesi, spor politikalarının belirlenmesi ve spor tesislerinin yönetimi konusunda önemli roller oynadığı belirlenmiştir. Bunlara ek olarak sosyal sermaye kavramını spor yönetim stratejileri içerisine entegre eden ülkelerin çoğunluğunun Bourdieu, Coleman ve Putnam’ın görüşlerinin her birinden farklı şekilde yararlandıkları ve olumlu çıktılar elde ettikleri görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, A., AYDOĞDU, V., YÜCE, S. G., KATIRCI, H. (2019). Examination Social Capital as a Strategic Management Tool in Sports and Some International Comparisons. GSI Journals Serie B: Advancements in Business and Economics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/831551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akdoğan, A.A. (2002). Toplumsal Sermaye: Yeni Sağın Küresel Yüzü. Yoksulluk, Şiddet ve İnsan Hakları, Ed. Yasemin Özdek, ISBN: 975-7669-89-TODAIE Yayınları,
  2. Ankara.
  3. Andrissen, D. (2004). Making sense of intellectual capital: designing a method for the valuation of intangibles/D. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of political economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9-49.
  4. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management decision, 36(2), 63-76.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1973). ‘Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction’, in Richard Brown. ed., Knowledge, Education, and Cultural Change, Tavistock, 487-511.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The Forms of Capital’, in Richardson, John G., ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood 244-246.
  7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
  8. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1999). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, ve G. Lindzy (Ed.),The handbook of social psychology vol. 2 in( 151–192). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Coalter, F. (2007). Sports clubs, social capital and social regeneration:‘ill-defined interventions with hard to follow outcomes’?. Sport in society, 10(4), 537-559.
  9. Coalter, F. (2008) Sport-indevelopment: Development for and through sport? In: Sport and Social Capital. Ed: Matthew Nicholson, Russel Hoye. 39-67.
  10. Cohen, D, & Prusak, L (2001). In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Harvard Business Press.
  11. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  12. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement), 95-120. Commonwealth of Australia ( 2001 ). Backing Australia ’s Sporting Ability. Canberra, Australia:Commonwealth of Australia. Crabbe, T. ( 2007 ). Reaching the ‘hard to reach’: engagement, relationship building and social control in sport based social inclusion work. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2 ( 1/2 ), pp. 27–40.
  13. Crabbe, T. ( 2008 ). Avoiding the numbers game: Social theory, policy and sport ’ s role in the art of relationship building. In: Sport and Social Capital. Ed: Matthew Nicholson, Russel Hoye. 21-37.
  14. Elsevier Oxford. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). T