Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

INVESTIGATION OF PHYSICAL FITNESS AND GROSS MOTOR CAPACITY IN CHILDREN WITH NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1

NÖROFİBROMATOZİS TİP 1 TANILI ÇOCUKLARDA KABA MOTOR KAPASİTE VE FİZİKSEL UYGUNLUĞUN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
78–84
Publication Date
2022-04-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Physical fitness and gross motor capacity differed significantly between NF1 and TDC (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To assess physical fitness, gross motor capacity, and their relationship in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Children with NF1 (n=40, age 6-17, mean 9.70±3.8 years) and typically developing children (TDC) (n= 28, age 5,5-17,5, mean 11.35±3.0 years) were evaluated by the six-minute walking test, sit-up test, sit-and-reach test, flamingo balance test and body mass index.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Physical fitness and gross motor capacity differed significantly between NF1 and TDC (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fiziksel Uygunluk · Fizyoterapi · Nörofibramatozis tip 1

Abstract

Purpose: To assess physical fitness, gross motor capacity, and their relationship in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Materials and Methods: Children with NF1 (n=40, age 6-17, mean 9.70±3.8 years) and typically developing children (TDC) (n= 28, age 5,5-17,5, mean 11.35±3.0 years) were evaluated by the six-minute walking test, sit-up test, sit-and-reach test, flamingo balance test and body mass index. Gross motor capacity was assessed with the Gross Motor Function Measure D and E subdimensions. Results: Physical fitness and gross motor capacity differed significantly between NF1 and TDC (p

Özet

Amaç: Nörofibramatozis Tip 1 (NF1) tanılı çocuklarda kaba motor kapasite, ve fiziksel uygunluğu ve birbirleri arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: NF1'li çocuklar (n=40, yaş 6-17, ortalama 9,70±3.8 yıl) ve tipik gelişen çocuklar (TGÇ) (n= 28, yaş 5,5-17,5, ortalama 11,35±3,0 yıl) altı dakikalık yürüme testi, mekik testi, otur-uzan testi, flamingo denge testi ile değerlendirildi ve vücut kitle indeksi hesaplandı. Kaba motor fonksiyon, Kaba Motor Fonksiyon Ölçütü D ve E alt boyutları ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Fiziksel uygunluk ve kaba motor kapasite NF1 ve TDC arasında anlamlı farklılık gösterdi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇANKAYA, Ö., SEL, S. A., GÜRLER, G., ALTUNBÜKER, H., GÜNEL, M. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF PHYSICAL FITNESS AND GROSS MOTOR CAPACITY IN CHILDREN WITH NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 78–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/830799

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Solem EP, Primiano M, McQuillen MP, et al. Factors associated with parental knowledge of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): Parental affected status and genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2020;00:1-8
  2. Miller DT, Freedenberg D, Schorry E, et al. Health Supervision for Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Pediatrics. 2019;143(5):e20190660
  3. Summers MA, Quinlan KG, Payne JM, et al. Skeletal muscle and motor deficits in Neurofibromatosis Type 1. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2015;15(2):161‐170
  4. Cornett KM, North KN, Rose KJ, Burns J. Muscle weakness in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(8):733‐736
  5. Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 5th ed. Maryland; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. 6. Østensjø, S., Carlberg, E. B., & Vøllestad, N. K. Motor impairments in young children with cerebral palsy: relationship to gross motor function and everyday activities. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2004;46(9), 580-589
  6. Lee, B. H. Relationship between gross motor function and the function, activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning in children with spastic cerebral palsy. JPTS, 2017;29(10), 1732-1736
  7. Reedman, S., Boyd, R. N., & Sakzewski, L. The efficacy of interventions to increase physical activity participation of children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2017;59(10), 1011-1018
  8. Roy, T. C., Springer, B. A., McNulty, V. et al. Physical fitness. Military Med, 2010; 175(8): 14-20
  9. Johnson BA, Macwilliams B, Carey JC, et al. Lower extremity strength and hopping and jumping ground reaction forces in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(1):247‐254. 11. de Souza JF, Araújo CG, de Rezende NA, et al. Exercise capacity impairment in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161(2):393‐395
  10. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: neurofibromatosis. Bethesda, Md., USA, July 13–15, 1987. Neurofibromatosis. 1988;1:172–178
  11. Mei, Z., Grummer-Strawn, L. M., Pietrobelli, A., et. Al. Validity of body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of body fatness in children and adolescents. J CLIN NUTR. 2002;75(6):978-985
  12. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-min