Journals / Endoskopi Gastrointestinal / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: Sayı: 3

Investigating Possible Risk Factors and Prognostic Markers for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis

Post-Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiyopankreatografi Pankreatitinde Olası Risk Faktörlerinin ve Prognostik Belirteçlerin Araştırılması

Pages
77–81
Publication Date
2020-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We found AST, ALT, Wbc, neutrophil, neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte, lymphocyte percentage, and NLR values were significantly higher in PEP group than the other group in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common postoperative complication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PEP also increases the length of hospitalization and causes an increase in costs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We found AST, ALT, Wbc, neutrophil, neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte, lymphocyte percentage, and NLR values were significantly higher in PEP group than the other group in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ERCP · Pankreatit · ERCP

Abstract

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common postoperative complication. PEP is often mild, but sometimes may be a life-threatening clinical picture. PEP also increases the length of hospitalization and causes an increase in costs. We aimed to present the ERCP results of our hospital and second to investigate the possible risk factors and prognostic markers for PEP. We found AST, ALT, Wbc, neutrophil, neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte, lymphocyte percentage, and NLR values were significantly higher in PEP group than the other group in this study.

Özet

Post- ERCP pankreatit (PEP), ERCP sonrası sık görülen komplikasyondur. PEP genellikle hafiftir, ancak bazen hayatı tehdit eden bir klinik tablo olabilir. PEP ayrıca hastanede kalış süresini uzatır ve maliyetlerde artışa neden olur. PEP için olası risk faktörlerini ve prognostik belirteçleri araştırmak üzere ERCP sonuçlarmızı değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Bu çalışmada AST, ALT, Wbc, nötrofil, nötrofil yüzdesi, lenfosit, lenfosit yüzdesi ve NLR değerlerinin PEP gelişen grupta PEP gelişmeyen gruba göre anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğunu bulduk.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABAYLI, B., GENCDAL, G. (2020). Investigating Possible Risk Factors and Prognostic Markers for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Endoskopi Gastrointestinal, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: Sayı: 3, 77–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/829646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Rodrigues-Pinto E, Macedo G, Baron TH. ERCP competence assessment: miles to go before standardization. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E718-E721. 2-Matsushita M, Koyabu M, Nishio A, Seki T, Okazaki K. Techniques of ERCP with a conventional endoscope in pancreatoduodenectomy anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 747-748. 3-Mine T, Morizane T, Kawaguchi Y,, Akashi R, Hanada K, Ito T, et al. Clinical practice guideline for post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2017 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017- 1359-5. [Epub ahead of print]. 4-Wang AY. Medications and methods for the prevention of Post-ERCP pancreatitis. GastroenterolHepatol (N Y) 2017; 13: 188-191. 5-Wilcox CM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis is more than just suppositories and stents. DigEndosc 2017; 29: 758-760. 6-Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1. 7-Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:143. 8-Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007; 39:793. 9-Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, Ren X, Lu NH, Fan ZN, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:31. 10-Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:1781. 11-Johnson GK, Geenen JE, Bedford RA, Johanson J, Cass O, Sherman S, et al. A comparison of nonionic versus ionic contrast media: results of a prospective, multicenter study. Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Study Group. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42:312. 12-Halme L, Doepel M, von Numers H, Edgren J, Ahonen J. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1999; 88:127. 13-Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Fennerty MB, DiSario JA, et al. Same-day discharge after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: observations from a prospective multicenter complication study. The Multicenter Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (MESH) Study Group. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:580. 14-Ho KY, Mont