Journals / Annals of Health Sciences Research / 2013 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Bacteria Isolated From Community Acquired Urinary Tract Infections of Pediatric Patients and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility

Pediatrik Yaş Grubunda Toplum Kökenli Üriner Sistem Enfeksiyonlarından İzole Edilen Bakteriler ve Antibiyotiklere Duyarlılıkları

Pages
1–4
Publication Date
2013-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sixteen of 151 E.coli strains 10.5% and 5 of 18 Klebsiella spp strains 27.7% produced ESBL.It was found that resistance to empirically and frequently used ampicillin 56.2% and amoxicillinclavulanat 38.2% and trimetoprim-sulphametoxasol 38.7% and was high.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the bacteria and their antibiotic susceptibilities from the urine samples of pediatric patients were evaluated retrospectively. 202 urine cultures were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The most common causative agent was Escherichia coli E. coli 74.7% followed by Enterobacter spp. 8.9% Enterococcus spp. 6.9% was the most common isolated gram positive bacteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sixteen of 151 E.coli strains 10.5% and 5 of 18 Klebsiella spp strains 27.7% produced ESBL.It was found that resistance to empirically and frequently used ampicillin 56.2% and amoxicillinclavulanat 38.2% and trimetoprim-sulphametoxasol 38.7% and was high.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İdrar · Escherichia coli · antibiyotik duyarlılıkları

Abstract

In this study, the bacteria and their antibiotic susceptibilities from the urine samples of pediatric patients were evaluated retrospectively. 202 urine cultures were included in the study. The most common causative agent was Escherichia coli E. coli 74.7% followed by Enterobacter spp. 8.9% Enterococcus spp. 6.9% was the most common isolated gram positive bacteria. Antibiotic resistance were detected for E. coli as 52.7% to ampicillin, 37.7% to trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 31.7% to ampicillin-sulbactam, 36.4% to amoxicillin-clavulanat, 17.8% to cefuroximeaxetil, 13.2% to cefotaxim, 13.7% to ceftriaxone, 19.2% to gentamycine and 5.2% to amikacin . All E.coli isolates were susceptible to imipenem. Sixteen of 151 E.coli strains 10.5% and 5 of 18 Klebsiella spp strains 27.7% produced ESBL.It was found that resistance to empirically and frequently used ampicillin 56.2% and amoxicillinclavulanat 38.2% and trimetoprim-sulphametoxasol 38.7% and was high. This state of affairs indicates the significance and necessity of performing antibiogram in the treatment of urinary infections in children

Özet

Bu çalışmada çocuk hastalardan elde edilen idrar örneklerinde etken olan bakteriler ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Çalışmaya enfeksiyon etkeni olan 202 idrar kültürü dahil edilmiştir. En sık neden Escherichia coli E.coli %74.7 olup bunu Klebsiella spp. %8.9 takip etmiştir. Enterococcus spp. %6.9 ise en sık izole edilen gram pozitif bakteridir. E.coli için ampisilin %52.7, trimetoprim-sulfametoksazol %37.7, ampisilin-sulbaktam %31.7, amoksisilin-klavulonat %36.4, sefuroksimaksetil %17.8, sefotaksim %13.2, seftriakson %13.7, gentamisin %19.2, amikasin %5.2 oranında dirençli saptandı. E.coli kökenlerinin hepsi imipeneme duyarlı bulunmuştur. Çalışmaya alınan 151 E.coli suşunun 16’sında %10.5 ve 18 Klebsiella spp suşunun 5’inde %27.7 GSBL saptanmıştır. Ampirik olarak yaygın kullanılan ampisilin %56.7 , amoksisilin-klavunat %38.2 ve trimetoprim-sülfametoksazole %38.7 direncin yüksek olduğu dikkat çekmektedir. Sonuçlar çocukluk döneminde üriner enfeksiyon tedavisinde antibiyogram yapılmasının önemini ve gerekliliğini göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKSAL, Z. Ş., ÇİÇEK, A. Ç., ERTÜRK, A., KÖKSAL, E., GETİR, S. A. (2013). Bacteria Isolated From Community Acquired Urinary Tract Infections of Pediatric Patients and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility. Annals of Health Sciences Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/824889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Elder J.S. Urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux. In Behrman RE, Kleigman RM, Jenson HB, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 17th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier 2004:1785-94
  2. Jones RN: Impact of changing pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients. Am J Med 1996; 100.6: 3S-12S
  3. Fluit AC, Jones ME, Schmitz FJ, Acar J, Gupta R, Verhoef J: Antimicrobial resistance among urinary tract infection isolates in Europe: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program 1997, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2000; 77:147- 152
  4. Bayraktar B, Özcan N, Borahan S, Başarı F, Bulut E: Yatan ve ayaktan hastalardan izole dilen üriner sistem enfeksiyonu etkeni Gram negatif çomaklarda antimikrobiyal direnç, ANKEM Dergisi 2004; 18:137-40
  5. Mathai D, Jones RN, Pfaller MA, SENTRY Participant Group North America: Epidemiology and frequency of resistance among pathogens causing urinary tract infection in 1,510 hospitalized patients: a report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (North America), Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 40:129-36
  6. Dağlar D, Demirbakan H,Yıldırım Ç,Öztürk F, Öscan A, Sipen N, Öğünç D, Çolak D.İdrar örneklerinden izole edilen bakteriler ve antibiyotiklere duyarlılıkları. Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg 2005; 35:189-94 7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institue: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Eighteenth informational supplement, Approved Standard M100-S18, CLSI, Wayne, PA 2008
  7. Hryniewicz K, Szczypa K, Sulikowska A, Jankowski K, Betlejewska K and Hryniewicz W: Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from urinary tract infections in Poland. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 47:773
  8. Ferry S, Burman LG and Holm SE: Clinical and bacteriological effects of therapy of urinary tract infection in primary health care: relation to in vitro sensitivity testing. Scand J Infect Dis 1998; 20:535
  9. Erb A, Stürmer T, Marre R, Brenner H. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli: Overview of geographical, temporal, and methodological variations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 26:83-90
  10. Bayraktar B, Özcan N, Borahan S, Başarı F, Bulut E: Yatan ve ayaktan hastalardan izoleedilen üriner sistem enfeksiyonu etkeni Gram negatif çomaklarda antimikrobiyal direnç, ANKEM Derg 2004; 18:137-40
  11. Pullukçu H, Işıkgöz Taşbakan M, Aydemir Ş, Sipahi OR, Turhan A, Özinel MA, Ulusoy S: idrar kültürlerin