Journals / Afro Eurasian Studies / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Long-term marketing effectiveness in Turkey: Does it differ from that in the US and Western Europe?

Pages
46–70
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We conclude with a research agenda on measuring and improving marketing efficiency in Turkey and other emerging markets

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Companies in Turkey aim to grow their market performance, but very few know how much additional sales or profits are generated by their marketing spending.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our results reveal that companies in Turkey receive about 8 TL in revenues for every 1 TL spent on marketing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We conclude with a research agenda on measuring and improving marketing efficiency in Turkey and other emerging markets
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:marketing efficiency · econometrics and time series · unit root

Abstract

Companies in Turkey aim to grow their market performance, but very few know how much additional sales or profits are generated by their marketing spending. This study is the first to quantify long-term marketing effectiveness in Turkey and compare it with that in the US and Western Europe. Our results reveal that companies in Turkey receive about 8 TL in revenues for every 1 TL spent on marketing. Compared to matched companies in mature markets, their marketing efficiency is only 69%. Across industries, industrial and automobile score highest in marketing efficiency, and textile and retail the lowest. We conclude with a research agenda on measuring and improving marketing efficiency in Turkey and other emerging markets

🔖

Cite This Article

PAUWELS, K., ARİ, E., OC, Y. (2014). Long-term marketing effectiveness in Turkey: Does it differ from that in the US and Western Europe?. Afro Eurasian Studies, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 46–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/823783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abell, D.F.,1978. Strategic Windows. Journal of Marketing, 42 (3), pp. 21-26.
  2. Akbıyık, A., S. Okutan and R.Altunişik,2008. Mobil Pazarlama Platformlarında İzinli Pazarlama Uygulamalarına Yönelik Tüketici Tutum Ve Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. 13.Uluslararası Pazarlama Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, p. 1-9.
  3. Akyüz, A. M. and H. Ayyıldız,2008. Satiş Noktasi Tutundurma Araçlarinin Tüketicilerin Kolayda Mal Satin Alma Davranişlarina Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araştirma. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. V.7, N.24, p. 110-134. Anderson Analytics,2010. Marketing Trend Report. available at: http://www.slideshare. net/kingkongzaa/marketing-trend-report-2010-anderson-analytics-meng Bass, F. M., 1969. A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables. Management Science, N.15, pp. 215-227.
  4. Bass, F. M. and T.L. Pilon, 1980. A Stochastic Brand Choice Framework for Econo- metric Modelling of Time Series Market Share Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (4), pp. 486-497
  5. Blattberg, R. C. and Neslin, S. A., 1990.
  6. Sales Promotion Concepts, Methods, and Strate- gies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Bronnenberg, B.J., Mahajan, V. and Vanhonacker,W., 2000. The Emergence of Market Structure in New Repeat-Purchase Categories: The Interplay of Market Share and Retailer Distribution. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, pp. 16–31.
  7. Christensen, C., 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. CMO Council, 2004. Chief Marketing Officers Council’s Marketing Measures Perfor- mance Audit, White Paper. Copernicus Consulting, 2005. The Marketing Performance Bell Curve. Available at: http://www.copernicusmarketing.com/univers/marketing_bell_curve.shtml D’Aveni, R., 1994. Hypercompetition. Free Press:
  8. New York. Day, G.,1981.The product life cycle: Analysis and applications issues. Journal of Market- ing, 45 (Fall),pp. 60–67.
  9. Dekimpe, M. and Hanssens, D. M., 1999.Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), pp. 397-412.
  10. Dekimpe, M. G. and Hanssens, M., 1995.The Persistence of Marketing Effects on Sales. Marketing Science, 14(1),pp. 1-21.
  11. Dekimpe, M. G., 1992. Long-run Modeling in Marketing. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Los Angeles, UCLA. Dekimpe, M. G. and Lehmann, D. R., 2004. Editorial: Introduction to the special issue on global marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(4), pp. 321−322 Dorf