Journals / Afro Eurasian Studies / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Militarism and Welfare Distribution in the Middle East and North Africa

Pages
68–91
Publication Date
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It could, however, serve as a preliminary study that provides insights to future research on militarism and welfare distribution in the MENA region

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most of the Middle Eastern and North Africa (MENA) countries display a significant contrast with the industrialized countries in terms of welfare distribution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study sheds light on the political economic structures leading to good and poor welfare efforts spent in the MENA region with a particular emphasis on the militaristic aspects of states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It could, however, serve as a preliminary study that provides insights to future research on militarism and welfare distribution in the MENA region
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Middle East and North Africa · militarism · welfare distribution

Abstract

Most of the Middle Eastern and North Africa (MENA) countries display a significant contrast with the industrialized countries in terms of welfare distribution. This study sheds light on the political economic structures leading to good and poor welfare efforts spent in the MENA region with a particular emphasis on the militaristic aspects of states. The analysis of causal relationships between different configurations of conditions and welfare efforts spent by states is performed with a systematic method of inference making called the fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). For this comparison, eight countries–namely Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen–are selected based on their relevance to the topic and availability of the relevant data.aspects such as high amount of military expenditure, high number of armed forces personnel and praetorian relationship between the military and the government are associated with good welfare distribution. Since this is a qualitative study, it does not provide explanation about the net effects of each variable on the welfare distribution. It could, however, serve as a preliminary study that provides insights to future research on militarism and welfare distribution in the MENA region

🔖

Cite This Article

GUNES, E., AYSAN, M. F. (2014). Militarism and Welfare Distribution in the Middle East and North Africa. Afro Eurasian Studies, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 68–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/823777

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abu-Bader, S. and Abu-Qarn, A. S., 2003.
  2. Government Expenditures, Military Spending and Economic Growth: Causality Evidence from Egypt, Israel and Syria. Journal of Policy Modelling, 25(06), pp. 567-583.
  3. Acemoglu, D. and Yared, P., 2010. Political Limits to Globalization. American Economic Review, 100(02), pp.83-88.
  4. Alami, R. and Karshenas, M., 2012. Deficient Social Policies Have Helped Spark the Arab Spring. (CDPR Development Viewpoint 70) [online] London: School of Oriental and African Studies. (Published February 2012) Available at: [Accessed 10 December 2014].
  5. Ardic, N., 2012. Understanding the ‘Arab Spring’: justice, dignity, religion and interna- tional politics. Afro Eurasian Studies, 1(1), pp. 8-52.
  6. Arias, O., 1989. 1987 Address to the United States Congress. In: M. Edelman, and J. Ke- nan, eds. The Costa Rica Reader. New York: Grove Weidenfeld. pp. 368-374.
  7. Bayat, A., 2006. The Political Economy of Social Policy in Egypt. In: M. Karshenas, and V. M. Moghadam, eds. Social Policy in the Middle East: Economic, Political, and Gen- der Dynamics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135-154.
  8. Baylouny, A. M., 2008. Militarizing Welfare: Neo-liberalism and Jordanian Policy. Middle East Journal, 62(02), pp. 277-303.
  9. Behar, M. A., and Mok, M. J., 2013. Does Public-Sector Employment Fully Crowd Out Pri- vate-Sector Employment?. IMF Working Papers No. 13/146. International Mon- etary Fund. Benoit, E., 1973. Defense and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Benoit, E. 1978. Growth and Defense in Developing Countries, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(02), pp. 271-280. Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC), 2014. Global Militarization Index. [online] Available at: [Accessed 10 December 2014].
  10. Bowman, K. S., 2002.
  11. Militarization, Democracy, and Development: The Perils of Praetorian- ism in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
  12. Bullock, B. and Firebaugh, G., 1990. Guns and Butter? The Effect of Militarization on Economic and Social Development in the Third World. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 18(02), pp. 231-266.
  13. Cypher, J. M., 1991. Military Spending After the Cold War. Journal of Economic Issues, 25(02), pp. 607-615.
  14. Dean, H. and Khan, Z. 1997. Muslim Perspectives on Welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 26(02), pp. 193-209.
  15. Deger, S. and Sen, S., 1995. Military Expenditure in Developing Countries. In: K. Hartley, and T. Sandler, eds. Handbook of Defense Economics. V