SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Zeugma Biological Science / 2022 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Review on anaplasmosis in different ruminants

Muhammad MUBASHİR
Muhammmad TARİQ
Muhammad SOHAİB KHAN
Muhammad SAFDAR
Mehmet ÖZASLAN
Muhammad IMRAN
Qudrat ULLAH
Faisal SİDDİQUE
Yasmeen JUNEJO
Pages
32–45
Publication Date
2022-04-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, we discussed six Anaplasma species and their vectors from across the globe.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Anaplasma bacteria, particularly A. marginale, A. ovis, and A. phagocytophilum, have attracted researchers' attention in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To a lesser extent, it has to do with the pathogenicity of these bacteria for farm animals and people alike.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, we discussed six Anaplasma species and their vectors from across the globe.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:anaplasmosis · Ruminants · Sub-types

Abstract

Anaplasma bacteria, particularly A. marginale, A. ovis, and A. phagocytophilum, have attracted researchers' attention in recent years. To a lesser extent, it has to do with the pathogenicity of these bacteria for farm animals and people alike. Anaplasmosis, which is a disease caused by numerous anaplasmosis species, is a major concern for animal producers. Ixodes, Dermacentor, Amblyomma, and Rhipicephalus ticks are the most frequent vectors of Anaplasma bacteria, which may be found in almost every region of the globe. Eukaryotic cells' vacuoles are host to obligatory intracellular bacteria of the Anaplasma genus. The obligatory intracellular bacteria Anaplasma centrale, A. bovis, A. ovis, and A. marginale, infect animal (mostly ruminants) red blood cells and monocytes. Dogs are its primary host, although it may also infect humans and domestic animals. In this study, we discussed six Anaplasma species and their vectors from across the globe.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUBASHİR, M., TARİQ, M., KHAN, M. S., SAFDAR, M., ÖZASLAN, M., IMRAN, M., ULLAH, Q., SİDDİQUE, F., JUNEJO, Y. (2022). Review on anaplasmosis in different ruminants. Zeugma Biological Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 32–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/823692

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Atif, F. A. J. P. (2016). "Alpha proteobacteria of genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae): Epidemiology and characteristics of Anaplasma species related to veterinary and public health importance." 143(6): 659-685.
  2. Atif, F., et al. (2012). "Prevalence of tick-borne diseases in Punjab (Pakistan) and hematological profile of Anaplasma marginale infection in indigenous and crossbred cattle." 64(1). Atif, F., et al. (2013). "Sero-epidemiological study of Anaplasma marginale among cattle." 23: 740-744.
  3. Aubry, P., et al. (2011). "A review of bovine anaplasmosis." 58(1): 1-30.
  4. Battilani, M., et al. (2017). "Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Anaplasma." 49: 195-211.
  5. Benelli, G., et al. (2017). "Nanoparticles as effective acaricides against ticks—a review." 8(6): 821-826.
  6. Berger, K., et al. (2014). "Relative humidity and activity patterns of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae)." 51(4): 769-776.
  7. Bissinger, B. W., et al. (2010). "Tick repellents: past, present, and future." 96(2): 63-79.
  8. Bizarro, G. L., Wurlitzer, W. B., Britto, E. P. J., Johann, L., Ferla, N. J., de Moraes, G. J., & da Silva, G. L. (2020). Two new species (Acari: Tydeidae: Eupodidae) from Mato Grosso, Brazil. International Journal of Acarology, 46(7), 538-543.
  9. Brayton, K. A., et al. (2005). "Complete genome sequencing of Anaplasma marginale reveals that the surface is skewed to two superfamilies of outer membrane proteins." 102(3): 844-849.
  10. Brouqui, P., et al. (2007). "Spotted fever rickettsioses in southern and eastern Europe." 49(1): 2-12.
  11. Cafiso, A., et al. (2016). "Molecular screening for Midichloria in hard and soft ticks reveals variable prevalence levels and bacterial loads in different tick species." 7(6): 1186-1192.
  12. Chen, S.-M., et al. (1994). "Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease." 32(3): 589-595.
  13. Chochlakis, D., et al. (2010). "Human anaplasmosis and Anaplasma ovis variant." 16(6): 1031. Chvostáč, M., et al. (2018). "Seasonal patterns in the prevalence and diversity of tick-borne Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an urban temperate forest in south western Slovakia." 15(5): 994. Colwell, D. D., et al. (2011). "Vector-borne parasitic zoonoses: emerging scenarios and new perspectives." 182(1): 14-21.
  14. Dantas-Torres, F. and D. J. T. i. p. Otranto (2016). "Best practices for preventing vector-borne diseases in dogs and humans." 32(1): 43-55.
  15. Dantas-Torres, F., et al