SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

HOW DOES STUDENTS’ LEARNING (ACHIEVEMENT) RELATE TO THEIR LEVEL OF WE-INTENTION AND THEIR LEARNING METHODS ON FACEBOOK?

Ali AKKAYA
Tuğrul Cabir HAKYEMEZ
Ekrem KUTBAY
Birgül KUTLU BAYRAKTAR
Pages
61–69
Publication Date
2016-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This model is assumed to help educators make use of social network sites efficiently.Keywords: Social Network Site, Facebook,Education, Collaborative learning, Jigsaw model, computer network

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Over the past decade, collaborative learning environments on Social Network Sites (SNSs) has become more widespread than ever before across the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yet, there is still lack of well-established methodologies that approach the learning process from pedagogical, group and social network perspectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This model is assumed to help educators make use of social network sites efficiently.Keywords: Social Network Site, Facebook,Education, Collaborative learning, Jigsaw model, computer network
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Over the past decade, collaborative learning environments on Social Network Sites (SNSs) has become more widespread than ever before across the world. Yet, there is still lack of well-established methodologies that approach the learning process from pedagogical, group and social network perspectives. In this study, it is aimed to develop a framework and also a roadmap for evaluating the impact of a pedagogical model, namely Jigsaw model, on the participation behaviors and successive achievements of the students. Here, the students are grouped based on their We-Intention levels (high and low) and status of participation in the Jigsaw learning process in Facebook groups. As a result of the study, a theoretical model is proposed towards the use of Jigsaw model on Facebook groups. This model is assumed to help educators make use of social network sites efficiently.Keywords: Social Network Site, Facebook,Education, Collaborative learning, Jigsaw model, computer network

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAYA, A., HAKYEMEZ, T. C., KUTBAY, E., BAYRAKTAR, B. K. (2016). HOW DOES STUDENTS’ LEARNING (ACHIEVEMENT) RELATE TO THEIR LEVEL OF WE-INTENTION AND THEIR LEARNING METHODS ON FACEBOOK?. Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 61–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/823558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aronson, E. (1978).
  2. The jigsaw classroom. Sage. Bicen, H., & Cavus, N. (2011). Social network sites usage habits of undergraduate students: Case study of Facebook. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 943-947.
  3. Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning,9(2), 151-170.
  4. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities. Carpenter, J. (2006). Effective Teaching Methods for Large Classes. Journal of Family&Consumer Sciences Education, 13-23.
  5. Bucci, T. T., Copenhaver, L. J., Lehman, B., & O’brien, T. (2003). Technology integration: Connections to educational theories. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(1), 30-46.
  6. Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.
  7. De Vries, D. L., & Slavin, R. E. (1978). Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT): Review of Ten Classroom Experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 28-38.
  8. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241-263.
  9. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative- learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1-19.
  10. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
  11. Gaggioli, A., Milani, L., Mazzoni, E., & Riva, G. (2011). Networked Flow: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration in Educational and Training Settings. The Open Education Journal, 41-49.
  12. Griffith, S., & Liyanage, L. (2008, June). An introduction to the potential of social networking sites in education. In Emerging Technologies Conference 2008 (p. 9). Kansanen, P. (2003). Studying--the Realistic Bridge Between Instruction and Learning. An Attempt to a Conceptual Whole of the Teaching-Studying- Learning Process. Educational Studies, 221-232.
  13. Karl, K. A., & Peluchette, J. V. (2011). “Friending” profes