SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2007 / Sayı: 12

Attitudes Towards Smoking among Smoker and Non-smoker University Students

Sigara İçen ve İçmeyen Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sigara İçmeye İlişkin Tutumları

Yrd.Doç.Dr. Hikmet YAZICI
Pages
—
Publication Date
2007-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showthat smokers and non-smokers differ in theirselection of important attributes, and vary in theimportance assigned to the positive and negativeoutcomes of smoking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the meaning of attributed tosmoking between smokers and non-smokers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ageof respondents varied from 18 to 27 years (M =21.72, SD = 1.45); 248 were female, 202 weremale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showthat smokers and non-smokers differ in theirselection of important attributes, and vary in theimportance assigned to the positive and negativeoutcomes of smoking.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üniversite öğrencileri · sigara içme tutumları · sigara içme alışkanlığı

Abstract

This study examines the meaning of attributed tosmoking between smokers and non-smokers. Fourhundred and fifty students of the KaradenizTechnical University participated in the study. Ageof respondents varied from 18 to 27 years (M =21.72, SD = 1.45); 248 were female, 202 weremale. In the present sample 185 participants werecurrently smokers (41.11 %) and 265 participantswere non-smokers (58.89 %). Attitudes towardssmoking were assessed by a series of 15statements. These attributes were negative andpositive consequences of smoking. Results showthat smokers and non-smokers differ in theirselection of important attributes, and vary in theimportance assigned to the positive and negativeoutcomes of smoking. Smokers tend to emphasizepositive outcomes and non-smokers tend toemphasize negative outcomes.

Özet

Bu çalışmada sigara içen ve içmeyenlerin sigaraiçmeye yükledikleri anlamlar arasındaki farkınönemi araştırılmaktadır. Çalışmaya KaradenizTeknik Üniversitesinden 450 öğrenci katılmıştır.Katılımcıların 248’i bayan 202’ si erkek olup yaşları18 ile 27 arasında değişmektedir (Ort = 21.72,Ss = 1.45). Araştırma grubundakilerin 185’ı(% 41.11) sürekli sigara içicisi iken, 265’i (% 58.89)sigara içmemektedir. Sigara içmeye ilgili tutumlar15 serilik ifadelerden oluşan bir araçla ölçülmüştür.Ölçekte yer alan ifadeler sigara içmenin olumlu veolumsuz sonuçlarıyla ilgilidir. Elde edilen sonuçlarsigara içen ve içmeyenlerin sigara içmeninsonuçlarına farklı anlamlar yüklediklerini vesigaranın olumlu ve olumsuz sonuçlarına ilişkindeğişik işaretlemeler yaptıklarını göstermiştir. Sigaraiçenler sigaranın olumlu sonuçlarına, içmeyenler iseolumsuz sonuçlarına vurgu yapma eğilimisergilemişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, Y. H. (2007). Attitudes Towards Smoking among Smoker and Non-smoker University Students. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 12. https://ajindex.com/articles/8210

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Altındağ, A., Yanık, M., Yengil, E., Karazeybek, A.H. (2005). Şanlıurfa’da üniversite öğrencilerinde madde kullanımı. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 6, 61-66.
  2. Azak, A. (2006). Sağlık memurluğu öğrencilerinin sigara kullanımını etkileyen faktörler. Toraks Der- gisi, 7, 120-124.
  3. Basen-Engquist, K., Edmundson, E.W., & Parcel, G.S. (1996). Structure of health risk behavior among high school students. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64, 764-775.
  4. Beck, A.T., Wright, F.D., Newman, C.F., & Liese, B.S. (1993). Cognitive therapy of substance abuse. New York: Guilford. Bennett, P., Norman, P., Moore, L., Murphy, S., & Tudor- Smith, C. (1997). Health locus of control and value for health in smokers and nonsmokers. Health Psychology, 16, 179-182.
  5. Calnan, M. (1989). Control over health and patterns of health related behavior. Social Science and Medi- cine, 29, 131-136.
  6. Carvajal, S.C., Wiatrek, D.E., Evans, R.I., Knee, C.R., & Nash, S.G. (2000). Psychosocial determinants of the onset and escalation of smoking: cross- sectional and prospective findings in multiethnic middle school samples. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 255-265.
  7. Chassin, L., Presson, C.C., Rose, J.S., & Sherman, S.J. (1998). Maternal socialization of adolescent smoking: Intergenerational transmission of smoking-related beliefs. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 12, 206-216.
  8. Clark, M. M., Croghan, I.T, Reading,. S, Schroeder, D.R., Stoner, S.M, Patent, C.A., Vickers, K.S. Goldman, M. S. & Rather, B C. (1993) Substance use disorders: Cognitive models and architecture. In K. Dobson & P. C. Kendall (Eds). Psychoplatology and cognition (pp. 245-292).
  9. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  10. Graham, J.W., Marks, G., & Hansen, W.B. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 291-298.
  11. Hine, D.W., Summers, C., Tilleczek, K., & Lewko, J. (1997). Expectancies and mental models as determinants of adolescents’ smoking decisions. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 35-52.
  12. Jenks, R.J. (1994). Attitudes and perceptions toward smoking: smokers' views of themselves and other smokers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 355-361.
  13. Kassel, J. D. (2000). Smoking and stress: Correlation, causation, and context. American Psychologist, 55, 1155-1156.
  14. Kenford, S.L, Wetterb, D.W., Welschc S.K.,Smithd, S.S., Fiored, M.C.Bakerc, T.B. (2005). Progression of college-age cigarette samplers:What influences outcome. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 285–294.
  15. Killen, J.D., Robinson, T.N., Haydel