Journals / Uluslararası Spor Egzersiz ve Antrenman Bilimi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Talent classification of motoric parameters with support vector machine

Pages
98–104
Publication Date
2018-09-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, precision varied between 92% and 100%.Conclusion: In the light of the information provided, successful classification of the test dataset using the model that is formed by the training dataset, points out a possible high classification accuracy of big test datasets even in the use of a small dataset in the training phase.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In recent years, the methods of analysis of data science have started to be used frequently in talent selection in sports and the evaluation of athletes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Measurements of height, arm span, body weight, 20-meter sprint test, vertical jump height, 1 kg medicine ball throw, back strength, hand grip strength, flexibility test and standing long jump values [mk1] were recorded with the contribution of 1240 participants who are 9 years old.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, precision varied between 92% and 100%.Conclusion: In the light of the information provided, successful classification of the test dataset using the model that is formed by the training dataset, points out a possible high classification accuracy of big test datasets even in the use of a small dataset in the training phase.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Talent selection · classification · support vector machines

Abstract

Aim: In recent years, the methods of analysis of data science have started to be used frequently in talent selection in sports and the evaluation of athletes. Based on the motor and physical measurements of the future athletes, determining which sports branch they are prone to is important in terms of training and resource planning. Within the scope of this study, it was aimed to propose a classification system to determine which sports branches the participants are suitable for, based on motor and physical measurements. Material and Methods: Measurements of height, arm span, body weight, 20-meter sprint test, vertical jump height, 1 kg medicine ball throw, back strength, hand grip strength, flexibility test and standing long jump values [mk1] were recorded with the contribution of 1240 participants who are 9 years old. Afterwards, grouping procedures were carried out with classification methods based on Support Vector Machines (SVM). Radial based functions are used as kernel functions of SVM. The results of evaluations made by consulting expert opinion beforehand were accepted as actual values, compared with the classification results and the performances of the classifiers were calculated. Within the scope of this study, participants were classified into four as rapidity branch (E), strength branch (F), height branch (G) and other group (H).Results: The accuracy values of classification of support vector machines were found ranging from 96% to 100% in each class, and 98% in average. Minimum value of sensitivity was found to be 93% while it was 99% in maximum. On the other hand, precision varied between 92% and 100%.Conclusion: In the light of the information provided, successful classification of the test dataset using the model that is formed by the training dataset, points out a possible high classification accuracy of big test datasets even in the use of a small dataset in the training phase.

🔖

Cite This Article

USTA, H. K., USTA, N., DURU, A. D., ÇOTUK, H. B. (2018). Talent classification of motoric parameters with support vector machine. Uluslararası Spor Egzersiz ve Antrenman Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 98–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/818976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akgün, N. (1994) Egzersiz Fizyolojisi. İzmir:
  2. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi. Aydos, L. (1991)
  3. Fiziksel Uygunluk, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 69-79.
  4. Bunker, R.P. & Fadi, T. (2017) A machine learning framework for sports result prediction, Applied Computing and Informatics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2017.09.005
  5. Buekers, M., Borry, P., Rowe, P. (2015) Talent in sports. some reflections about the search for future champions. Movement & Sport Sciences – Science & Motricit´e; 88, 3–12
  6. Cavedon, V., Zancanaro, C., Milanese, C. (2015) Physique and Performance of Young Wheelchair Basketball Players in Relation with Classification. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0143621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143621
  7. Cicioğlu, H., Kürkçü, R., Eroğlu, H., & Yüksel, S. (2007) 15-17 Yaş güreşçilerin fiziksel ve fizyolojik özelliklerinin sezonsal değişimi: Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 5: 1 51-6.
  8. Clarke, O.H. (1975)
  9. Exercise Physiology, Prentice Hall. New Jersey, USA. Coşan, F., Demir, A., Mengütay, S. (Ed). (2002) Türk Çocuklarının Fiziki Uygunluk Normları. İstanbul Olimpiyat Oyunları Hazırlık ve Düzenleme Kurulu Eğitim Yayınları Yayın No 1., İstanbul.
  10. Çalışkan, O. (2013) Özel düzenlenmiş Plyometrik antrenmanların atletizm yapan 11-13 yaş çocukların aerobik ve anaerobik güçlerine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Aksaray. Davoodi, E. & Khanteymoori, A. (2010) Horse racing prediction using artificial neural networks, Recent Adv. Neural Networks, Fuzzy Syst. Evol. Comput., pp. 155-160
  11. Figueiredo, A.J., Gonçalves, C.E., Coelho, E., et al. (2009): Youth soccer players, 11-14 years: Maturity, size, function, skill and goal orientation. Annals of Human Biology (36), 60-73.
  12. Gündüz, N. (2005)
  13. Antrenman Bilgisi, Birinci baskı, İzmir, Saray Medical Yayıncılık, sf. 21 22. Gündüz, N. (1997) Antrenman Bilgisi. Saray medikal yayıncılık 2. Yayın İzmir; s.23 Kamar, A. (2003) Sporda Yetenek Beceri ve Performans Testleri. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Ankara; s.40-41
  14. Karl, K. (2001) Sporda Yetenek Arama Seçme ve Yönlendirme Antrenör Eğitim Dizisi. Bağırgan Yayınevi., Ankara.
  15. Magill, A.R. (1989) Motor learning Concepts and Applications, Third Ed. Iowa, Wch, Publishers, 17-34
  16. Manfred, B. (1979)
  17. Training, Technik, Taktik: Reinbek. International Congress on judo. 1979
  18. Mccabe, A., & Trevathan, J. (2008). Artificial Intelligence in Sports Prediction. 1194-1197. 10.1109/ITNG.2008.203. Mengütay. S., Demir, A., Coşan, F. (2002) Olimpiyatlar İçin Sporcu Kay