Journals / Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RENEWABLE ENERGY AND EMPLOYMENT: A BOOSTRAP GRANGER CAUSALITY ANALYSIS / Yenilenebilir Enerji Ve İstihdam İlişkisi: Boostrap Granger Nedensellik Analizi

YENİLENEBİLİR ENERJİ VE İSTİHDAM İLİŞKİSİ: BOOSTRAP GRANGER NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ / The Relationship Between Renewable Energy and Employment: A Boostrap Granger Causality Analysis

Pages
263–280
Publication Date
2020-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, there is a two-way causality relationship between non-renewable energy and employment in India, China, Turkey, and Indonesia; and one-way causality from employment to non-renewable energy in Brazil and the no causal relationship is found between non-renewable energy and employment in Russia, South Africa, Mexico and South Korea.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to test the causal relationship between renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and employment for 1991-2014 in the high-income developing BRICS and MIST countries with Boostrapt Granger Causality analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, two models have been created; in the first model, the causality relationship between renewable energy and employment has been tested and in the second model, the causality between non-renewable energy and employment has been analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, there is a two-way causality relationship between non-renewable energy and employment in India, China, Turkey, and Indonesia; and one-way causality from employment to non-renewable energy in Brazil and the no causal relationship is found between non-renewable energy and employment in Russia, South Africa, Mexico and South Korea.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yenilenebilir Enerji · Yenilenemeyen Enerji · İstihdam

Abstract

This study aims to test the causal relationship between renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and employment for 1991-2014 in the high-income developing BRICS and MIST countries with Boostrapt Granger Causality analysis. For this reason, two models have been created; in the first model, the causality relationship between renewable energy and employment has been tested and in the second model, the causality between non-renewable energy and employment has been analyzed. When the findings are evaluated, there is a bidirectional causality relationship between renewable energy and employment in Russia, India, and Indonesia; a causality relationship from renewable energy to employment has been identified in South Africa, Russia, and Turkey. In China, Mexico and South Korea, a causal relationship between renewable energy and employment has not been achieved. On the other hand, there is a two-way causality relationship between non-renewable energy and employment in India, China, Turkey, and Indonesia; and one-way causality from employment to non-renewable energy in Brazil and the no causal relationship is found between non-renewable energy and employment in Russia, South Africa, Mexico and South Korea.

Özet

Bu çalışma, yüksek gelirli gelişmekte olan BRICS ve MIST ülkelerinde 1991-2014 yılları için yenilenebilir enerji, yenilenemeyen enerji ve istihdam arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini Boostrapt Granger Nedensellik analiz ile test etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu nedenle iki model oluşturulmuş; ilk modelde yenilenebilir enerji ve istihdam, ikinci modelde ise yenilenemeyen enerji ve istihdam arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi tahmin edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular değerlendirildiğinde Rusya, Hindistan ve Endonezya’da yenilenebilir enerji ve istihdam arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunurken; Güney Afrika, Rusya ve Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerjiden istihdama doğru bir nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Çin, Meksika ve Güney Kore’de ise yenilenebilir enerji ve istihdam arasında nedensellik ilişkisi elde edilememiştir. Diğer yandan Hindistan, Çin, Türkiye ve Endonezya’da yenilenemeyen enerji ve istihdam arasında çift yönlü, Brezilya’da ise istihdamdan yenilenemeyen enerjiye doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmuş; Rusya, Güney Afrika, Meksika ve Güney Kore’de ise yenilenemeyen enerji ile istihdam arasında nedensellik ilişkisine rastlanılmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZSOY, F. N., ÖZPOLAT, A. (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RENEWABLE ENERGY AND EMPLOYMENT: A BOOSTRAP GRANGER CAUSALITY ANALYSIS / Yenilenebilir Enerji Ve İstihdam İlişkisi: Boostrap Granger Nedensellik Analizi. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 263–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/816081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Afolayan, O. T., Okodua, H., Matthew, O., ve Osabohien, R. (2019). Reducing Unemployment Malaise in Nigeria: The Role of Electricity Consumption And Human Capital Development. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(4), 63-73.
  2. Apergis, N., ve Salim, R. (2015). Renewable Energy Consumption and Unemployment: Evidence from A Sample Of 80 Countries and Nonlinear Estimates. Applied Economics, 47(52), 5614-5633.
  3. Besel, F. (2017). Energy Consumption and Unemployment Nexus in Turkey. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(2), 21-31. Bouchaour C., ve Al-Zeaud H. A. (2012). Oil Price Distortion and Their Impact on Algerian Macroeconomic. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(18). Breusch, T ve A. Pagan, (1980) The LM Test and Its Application to Model Specification in Econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47 (1), 239-253.
  4. Bulavskaya, T. ve Reynès, F. (2017), Job Creation and Economic Impact of Renewable Energy in The Netherlands. Renewable Energy, 119, 528-538.
  5. Chang, T., Fang, W., ve Wen, L. F. (2001).
  6. Energy Consumption, Employment, Output, And Temporal Causality: Evidence from Taiwan Based on Cointegration And Error-Correction Modelling Techniques. Applied Economics, 33(8), 1045-1056.
  7. Cheng, Benjamin S., Donald R. Andrews, ve Brenda S. Birkett. (1998). Investigation of Cointegration And Causality Between Energy Consumption and Employment with Implications For The Environment. Energy Sources 20(7): 681-690.
  8. Dünya Bankası Veri Tabanı (2020). https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx EDF Energy, (2020). Erişim adresi: https://www.edfenergy.com/for-home/energywise/ renewable-energy-sources Erol, U., ve Eden, S. H. (1987). Time Series Analysis of The Causal Relationships Between US Energy and Employment. Resources and Energy, 9(1), 75-89.
  9. George, E.O., ve Oseni, J.E. (2012), The Relationship Between Electricity Power and Unemployment Rates in Nigeria. Australian Journal of Business and Managerial Research, 2, 10-19.
  10. Gil-Alana, L. A., (2003). Unemployment and Real Oil Prices in Australia: A Fractionally Cointegrated Approach. Applied Economics Letters, 10(4), 201-204.
  11. Global Insights (2008). Current and Potential Green Jobs in The U.S. Economy. The United States Conference of Mayors Grossman, G. M., Ve Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (No. W3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. Gülen, G. (2011).
  12. Defining, Measuring and Predicting Green Jobs. Working Paper, Center for Energy Economics,